Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: mumbai nagpur Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.006 seconds)

Jul 07 2011 (HC)

Deepak Dashrath Chahande and ors. Vs. Civil Judge, Junior Division and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-07-2011

..... of the view that the composite application filed by the petitioners against respondent nos. 6 to 11 was maintainable and did not suffer from the defect of multifariousness. the petition has already been withdrawn against respondents nos. 12 to 14 and the other respondents are formal parties. we, therefore, hold that the ..... which is reproduced hereunder :"8. with regard to the plea of multifariousness in respect of respondents nos. 6 to 11, we might point out that section 15(2) provides that after an election petition is filed, an ..... application of the principles as contained in the civil procedure code, the common election petition was maintainable. it was not a case where the petitions were suffering from multifariousness inasmuch as different causes of action were sought to be combined in one election petition. the relevant paragraph of the said judgment is paragraph (8), ..... was different for each of the election petitioners. hence, the election petition was not suffering from the vice of multifariousness. if multifarious causes of action were to be considered, the learned judge would have been within his right not to entertain a petition containing ..... multifarious causes of action. therefore, in the light of the judgment of the learned single judge of this court in bhimaji laxman .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //