Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: mumbai Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.005 seconds)

Jan 19 1998 (HC)

Ms. Sophia Gulam Mohammed Bham Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-1998

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR446; 1999CriLJ2140

..... for the simple reason that the propensity and potentiality of the detenu, amongst others, would spread naturally to a scenario to vast extent and the area with several transactions with multifarious persons and that, therefore, we are, for no minute, to consider the vitiation of the impugned order of detention clamped against the detenu as contended by mr. shirish gupte, learned ..... order of detention against the present detenu. as the learned public prosecutor has rightly contended that paras 13 and 14 of the grounds of detention is the resultant factor of multifarious entries found in the recovered diary among the detenu and co detenu's inter se and that the said paragraphs are being referred to in the grounds of detention as ..... counsel appearing for the petitioner, next contended that the recovery of the diaries from one of the co-detenu at the relevant day consisting of several entries pertaining to the multifarious monetary transactions taken place amongst the detenu, inter se, various in nature, though formulating the ground nos. 13 and 14 of the grounds of detention, copies of the same have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1998 (HC)

Smt. Asha Arun Gawli Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-1998

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR828; 1999CriLJ333

..... perusal of the same, the apex court held the above ratio where the grounds formulated for detention of the detenu was apparently only on a single ground and not on multifarious grounds. since there was only one ground and to rely upon the same ground, it was extraneous consideration the supreme court probably held that the said only ground has become .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1998 (HC)

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-1998

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

..... ' and continued to render the service in that post till his services were terminated. as an assistant, he was designated as a group leader. question was where an employee has multifarious duties and if a dispute arises as to whether he is workmen or not, the court must find out what are the primary and basic duties of the person concerned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //