Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: orissa Page 1 of about 17 results (0.702 seconds)

Sep 01 1981 (HC)

Tima Mali and ors. Vs. Kartika Meher and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1981Ori216; 52(1981)CLT431

..... day in favour of plaintiffs and since then the plaintiffs are in possession of those lands. the defendant in the written statement has stated that the suit is bad for multifariousness. the lower appellate court has relied on the decision in hadu sahu v. state of orissa, air 1964 orissa 159 and has held that the suit is not maintainable. in ..... . each of the plaintiffs set up a claim to a parcel of land in which the other plaintiffs were not interested. it was held that the suit was bad for multifariousness. there was misjoinder of plaintiffs because each plaintiff had separately to prove his own possession for more than sixty years and there was no common question of fact or law ..... the defendant is challenged and all the plaintiffs are aggrieved by such action of the defendant, they can file one suit and such a suit will not be bit by multifariousness. as has been held by the patna high court if the defendant does not make any challenge in the trial court as to the ..... multifariousness and allows a decree to be passed and if the decree does not affect the suit on merits in that case it would be deemed that be has waived. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1959 (HC)

Basanta Priya Dei and anr. Vs. Ramkrishna Das and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1960Ori159

..... authority of the earlier decisions in the other high courts referred to in the judgment, the nagpur full bench decided that the suit was not bad for multifariousness. mr. p. kar, learned counsel, appearing for the apposite party while commenting on the nagpur decision cited above, pointed out that in paragraph 16 ..... places one single suit could nor be instituted in the court of the additional district judge of damoh and secondly that the suit was bad for multifariousness. it was held that so far as the question of territorial jurisdiction was concerned. section 17, civil procedure code is a complete answer. that section is ..... some in jabalpur tahsil. the suit was filed in the court of the civil judge, damoh and though no objection was taken on the ground of multifariousness and want of jurisdiction, the lower court had held that regard (being had to order 1. rule 3 and section 17 of the code of ..... apart, this certainly would result in multiplicity of proceedings. the only bar to such joinder is that the court has to see that there is no multifariousness, when there is misjoinder of parties and causes of action, which certainly would cause embarrassment and the trial of the action would be prejudiced. that, ..... filed in the court of the munsif, cuttack. it has to be decided whether the suit as filed in the cuttack court is bad for multifariousness and also to consider whether the splitting up of the cause of action is likely to result in multiplicity of proceedings. futhermore, it has also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 1972 (HC)

Mania Barik Vs. Suki Bewa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1973Ori47

..... such adoption is within the period of limitation prescribed under article 118 of old limitation act the suit must fail as barred by time; (2) the suit is bad for multifariousness. the causes of action in respect of 'kha' and 'ga' schedules being separate have been clubbed together and, therefore, the suit must also fail.6. plaintiff filed, a simple suit ..... . 3 was never adopted by bhaban barik, this point has no legs to stand upon and accordingly fails.7. the next contention agitated is that the suit is bad for multifariousness inasmuch as it unites two separate causes of action, one for partition of schedule 'kha' properties and the other for a declaration of title to schedule 'ga' properties. there has ..... been disapproved in the madras case quoted above (air 1955 mad 300).for the aforesaid reasons i am satisfied that the present suit does not suffer from any infirmity of multifariousness. this point accordingly fails.11. in the result, therefore, there is no merit in this appeal which is dismissedwith costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1963 (HC)

Hadu Sahu and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1964Ori159

..... a cause of action against another plaintiff in respect of another land. the learned subordinate judge took a correct view in holding that the suit is bad on account of multifariousness. air 1928 cal 92 is clearly distinguishable on facts as both the plaintiffs interested in different plots of land inducted the same sets of tenants who claim similar rights against .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2010 (HC)

Nayan Sundari BewA. Vs. Subash Chandra Behera and ors

Court : Orissa

..... been grossly undervalued and proper court-fees have not been paid, the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties and also for non-joinder of necessary parties and also for multifariousness. therefore, the defendant prayed for dismissal of the suit with costs.6. defendant nos.2 to 6 in a separate written statement have almost admitted the averments made in the ..... by law of limitation, estoppel and acquiescence ?d) has the suit been properly valued and proper court fees have been paid on the plaint ?e) is the suit band for multifariousness ?f) is the suit bad for miss-joinder and non-joinder of parties ?g) is defendant no.1 adopted son of bansidhar behera ?h) has the deed of acknowledgement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 1999 (HC)

indrajeet Roy Vs. Republic of India and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 87(1999)CLT859; 1999(II)OLR92

..... same witness has implicated the accused person such contingency may arise when there are different investigating agencies or before the same investigating agency. the reasons for such omission may be multifarious. it may be that the particular investigating officer might not have put a particular question to the witness. it may be that the witness might not have thought the particular .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2008 (HC)

Rama Chandra Sishu Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(1)OLR471

..... . in the past, the member, board of revenue was not in a position to handle all the revision cases filed under the aforesaid three sections before him along with other multifarious responsibilities. consequently there was straggering accumulation of cases, thereby causing immense difficulties to the litigant public. realising such difficulty, the state government in exercise of its powers under section 33 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2008 (HC)

Jayaram Bhuyan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR438

p.k. tripathy, j.1. initially petitioner filed this writ petition with multifarious prayer, viz., (1) to quash the order annexure-17, i.e., the order in review passed on 14.10.1999 by opposite party no. 2, i.e., the director, higher .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2010 (HC)

M/S. Trishakti Stone Crushing. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... .5. the very least that can be said in the present stage is that, the petitioners have been adopting every means to continue operating their stone crushing units by filing multifarious petitions from time to time and consequently continue to pollute the air in the area in which they operating and making the state pollution control board into a mere spectator .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1985 (HC)

Smt. Draupadi Senapati Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR34

..... nature of a trustee in respect of the property in question. it is common knowledge that in socialist state as ours the governments and other public authorities involve themselves in multifarious development activities. such activities are undertaken by most of the departments of the government and the local authorities like panchayats, municipalities, corporation, etc. consequently more and more people are expected .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //