Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 30 results (0.005 seconds)

May 05 1952 (HC)

Madhosingh and anr. Vs. Jaitpalsingh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1954Raj46

..... 23-7-1946, in the court of the judicial superintendent, malanee. the suit included two distinct claims based on two separate causes of action. there was an objection as to multifarious-ness. thereupon the court ordered in may 1947 that the plaint should be amended, and allowed 14 days' time to do so.3. in july 1947, the appellants filed two ..... court.this argument is, in my opinion, untenable. it is true that the court did pass an order to the effect that the suit, as originally filed, was bad for multifariousness, and gave an opportunity to the appellants to amend the suit. it was open to them not to amend the original plaint, in which case, it would have been dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2013 (HC)

Suresh Kumar and ors Vs. State (Finance) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... for claiming the third selection grade, in our view, does not render their collective legal pursuit untenable. the challenge to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of multifariousness of facts and causes of action, thus fails.10. as would be detailed hereinafter, under the rules of 1953 as well as the rules of 2002, on various dates, the ..... with grade pay of rs.6600/-, is misconceived.5. the respondent no.2 in his reply has, at the outset, questioned the maintainability of the proceedings on the ground of multifariousness of facts and causes of action. they have contended as well that the challenge is liable to be rejected in limine on the ground of undue delay. while dismissing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2015 (HC)

Nikhil Soni Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... disclosed. it is settled law that no amount of evidence can be looked into for which there are no pleadings. 3. that the writ petition suffers from the defect of multifariousness. neither the necessary parties have been impleaded nor the petition disclose the cause of action. the answering respondents fails to understand as to why union of india or the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2000 (HC)

Brothers Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporati ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2001Raj266; 2001(1)WLC13

..... corporations act. 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1951'). annexure-19 relates to petitioner no. 1 whereas annexure-20 relates to petitioner no. 2, in order to avoid multifariousness. learned counsel for the petitioners presses the writ petition only for petitioner no. 1 and withdraw the petition of petitioner no. 2 with liberty to file a fresh one,2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1951 (HC)

Manak Chand and ors. Vs. the Municipal Council and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1951Raj139

..... because the five petnrs. have joined in this petn, & have objected to the recovery of the property tax from all of them severally. this, on the other hand, has saved multifariousness of the proceedings & it does not appear, in the circumstances of this case, that the petn. should be thrown out on the grounds of joinder of the five petnrs. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1951 (HC)

Nathulal Vs. Collector, Sawai, Jaipur

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1952Raj36

..... was a second appeal from a decree of a district judge of benares affirming a decree of the munsif of benares; who had rejected the plaint on the ground of multifariousness. it was held that the munsif had rightly rejected the plaint. it would thus appear that even the said remarks of justice mahmood were made in connection with the procedural .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2002 (HC)

Ganeshdas and anr. Vs. Ramesh Chandra and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj977; 2002(3)WLN608

..... view has been reiterated in mst. rarndayee v. dhanraj kochar and ors. (5), wherein examining a case where the learned trial court has rejected the application raising the plea of multifariousness at a belated stage contending that instead of two separate suits one suit could have been filed, the court rejected the revision holding that it was not improper exercise of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2002 (HC)

Ganeshdas and anr. Vs. Ramesh Chandra and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2002Raj341; 2002(3)WLN608

..... has been reiterated in mst. ramdayee v. dhanraj kochar, air 1972 cal 313 wherein examining a case where the learned trial court has rejected the application raising the plea of multifariousness at a belated stage contending that instead of two separate suits one suit could have been filed, the court rejected the revision holding that it was not improper exercise of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1990 (HC)

Prakash Chand and ors. Vs. That State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN317

..... in which the vacancies occur, no such difficulty could arise. however, in practice v/e find that the rajasthan public service commission as well as other appointing authorities are having multifarious functions to perform. the r.p.s.c. is required to make recruitment for over 50 services apart from consultative functions in the matter of framing of service rules and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1991 (HC)

OmnaraIn Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC641; 1991WLN(UC)292

..... year in which the vacancies occur, no such difficulty could arise. however, in practice we find that the rajasthan public service commission as well as other appointing authorities are having multifarious functions to perform. the r.p.s.c. is required to make recruitment for over 50 years apart from consultative functions in the matter of framing of service rules and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //