Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Sorted by: old Court: kerala Page 1 of about 49 results (0.008 seconds)

Sep 01 1959 (HC)

Joseph Alias Kochu Vs. Makkaru Pillai

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1960Ker127

..... stated, as a general rule, that where substantial common questions of fact are involved in different claims against different parties, their joinder in one suit will not be regarded as multifarious.'20. in these circumstances we must repel the contention and hold that the suit is not bad for misjoinder of parties or causes of action.21. the third contention also ..... plaintiff.' (c. p. c., 6th edition, vol. 2, page 1899.)17. under the practice of the old court of chancery, a bill of complaint was open to a demurrer for multifariousness- when it attempted to embrace too many objects or causes of suit. the current provision which permits the joinder of defendants is order 1, rule 3 of the code of ..... 47(1) of the code of civil procedure, 1908, as contended by the appellants before us.15. the second contention of the appellants is that the suit is bad for multifariousness. the allegation in the plaint is :(passage in malaya lam omitted}.it is admitted that these allegations are sufficient to sustain the plaint, the contention is that the lower court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1984 (HC)

Kunhappa Nair and anr. Vs. Suresh Kumar and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1984Ker99

..... dismissed by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff's appearance or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or misjoinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the pan of the plaintiff to produce probate or letters of administration or succession certificate when the same .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2005 (HC)

Jamal Vs. Safia Beevi

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT359

..... petition is filed uniting all the causes of action there will be misjoinder of causes of action and misjoinder of parties. petition of such a nature would be bad for multifariousness.12. the misjoinder of cause of action is however regarded as irregularity and not a ground on which petition be dismissed unless objection is taken at the appropriate time. objection ..... distinct portions of the same structure, in the event of which there is no misjoinder of causes of action or misjoinder of parties and the petition is not hit by multifariousness.10. the difficulty arises when the landlord unites several causes of actions against various tenants who are in occupation of distinct portions of same building under separate tenancy arrangements. question ..... tenants in a single rent control petition in the event of which such a petition will be bad for misjoinder of causes of actions or misjoinder of parties due to multifariousness, is the question that has come up for consideration in these cases.2. a division bench of this court in c.r.p. nos. 714 of 1992 and 573 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Manikkan Vs. Govindaraj

Court : Kerala

..... action should be taken at the earliest opportunity as provided in order i rule 13 and order ii rule 7 of the code. similarly, the objections on the ground of multifariousness also should be taken at the first opportunity by virtue of the aforementioned provisions. the effect of not taking the objection at the earliest possible opportunity has been narrated in ..... action are joined separately against different defendants. this is violation of order ii rule 3 r/w order i rule 3 of the code. such a misjoinder is technically called multifariousness.24. causes of action cannot be joined in a suit filed against several defendants if they are not all jointly interested in the causes of action, unless common questions are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1973 (HC)

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. Keral ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1974]33STC305(Ker)

..... of various sizes and length. during the assessment year 1965-66, they manufactured 700 mm. pipes, 16 ft. in length and weighing 11/2 tons. these pipes are put to multifarious uses, namely, for pillars, for channels, for engineering and construction purposes, for water supply schemes, road culverts, under tunnels, spouts of irrigation channels, cross masonry works, drainage schemes, etc. during .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1974 (HC)

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. Alway ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1974]34STC467(Ker)

..... , to retail shop owners, may also be stipulated. the restriction may again be that such sales shall be only on production of permits or authorities. living as we do amidst multifarious controls and regulations in very many spheres of activity such restrictions need no longer appear to be strange. we are afraid that there is not much relevance in, the plea .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1980 (HC)

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Malayalam Plantations Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1981Ker1

..... detriment.23. the true position is as stated by poti j., speaking for the bench in state of kerala v. chandran (ilr (1980) j ker 609) :--'the state has necessarily multifarious activities and it functions through its officers at various levels. what an officer does in the usual course at one end of the administration cannot normally operate as estoppel against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1982 (HC)

Bhaskaran Vs. Sub-divisional Officer

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1982(II)KLT248

..... situation which is its own creation.26. the modern state is not a simple mechanism to safeguard the country from external aggressions and internal disturbances; it is a against performing multifarious functions. it builds dams, construct railways, operates buses, flies planes, digs canals, generates electricity, distributes essential articles, carries letters establishes schools, colleges, ports and poor homes. it is active in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1983 (HC)

Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. Vs. A. John Anthrapper

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas717(Ker)

..... very wide in nature and cannot be restricted to rubber plantation alone. even the name of the company, the malabar industrial company ltd., suggests that it can engage itself in multifarious activities. the board of directors decided to sell the estate in the best interests of the company since they found that the working of the company was rendered difficult on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1985 (HC)

Advocate General Vs. K. Ramkumar

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1986CriLJ60

..... courts of justice in the land whether they are regarded as superior or inferior courts of justice. (para 43)courts of justice have, in accordance with their constitutions, to perform multifarious functions for due administration of justice. any lapse from the strict standards of rectitude in performing these functions is bound to affect administration of justice which is a term of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //