Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Sorted by: old Court: mumbai Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.004 seconds)

Nov 21 1968 (HC)

Bhimaji Laxman Dinde Vs. C.N. Gite

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-21-1968

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR490; 1969MhLJ759

..... of the view that the composite application filed by the petitioners against respondents nos. 6 to 11 was maintainable and did not suffer from the defect of multifariousness. the petition has already been withdrawn against respondents nos. 12 to 14 and the other respondents are formal parties. we, therefore, hold that the ..... respondents are concerned and they will have to be declared to be elected uncontested from ward no. 2.8. with regard to the plea of multifarious-ness in respect of respondents nos. 6 to 11, we might point out that section 15(2) provides that after an election petition is filed ..... stood altogether on a different footing, and in no case could it be said that the petition against them did not suffer from the defect of multifariousness. mr. rane thereupon stated before us that he would withdraw the petition so far as respondents nos. 12 to 14 were concerned. the petition ..... was not barred by the provisions of section 15 of the said act.6. the next contention taken on behalf of the respondents is as to multifarious-ness. this contention can be divided into two parts: (a) that the rejection of each nomination paper filed by each of the petitioners furnished ..... election rules and the learned trial judge had, therefore, no jurisdiction to go behind that order, and thirdly, that the election petition suffered from multifarious-ness inasmuch as all the petitioners could not combine to file one composite application as the act of rejection of the nomination of each petitioner was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1968 (HC)

Union of India Owning and Administering Central Railway Per General Ma ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-1968

Reported in : AIR1969Bom401; (1969)71BOMLR214; ILR1969Bom864; 1968MhLJ797

..... to be made liable that is conceived of by this section. according to us, this clause which is introduced after 1948 only illustrates that fact that the central government has multifarious activities, and so far as its commercial undertaking in the matter of railways is concerned, it wants the notice of suit against it to be addressed to the general manager .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1968 (HC)

Prabhakar Ganpatrao Samel Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-27-1968

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR500; 1967MhLJ9

..... is the determination of the legislative policy and its formulation as a rule of conduct. obviously it cannot abdicate its functions in favour of another. but in view of the multifarious activities of a welfare state, it cannot presumably work out all the details to suit the varying aspects of a complex situation. it must necessarily delegate the working out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1968 (HC)

N.J. Nayadu and Co. and ors. Vs. Administrator of the City of Nagpur a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-1968

Reported in : AIR1970Bom59; (1969)71BOMLR253; ILR1970Bom68; 1969MhLJ234

..... been granted to the corporation for the purposes of the act which itself is a sufficient guideline according to the decision of the supreme court. the corporation is charged with multifarious duties. it has to find funds, finances and revenues for discharging its functions effectively and efficiently. it knows as a representative body what are the needs )f its people, residents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //