Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-02-2016
..... bar in the respective statutes referred to hereinabove was attracted and the petitioners plaint came to be rejected. the petitioners, on the basis of misjoinder of alleged causes of action, multifariousness and without compliance with statutory requirements have virtually invited the rejection of their plaint. in these circumstances, at least the petitioners, cannot claim any equities or indulgences in their favour .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : May-04-2016
..... said provision does not clarify anywhere that if an application under s.34 is rejected on merits alone, only then the appeal would lie. the ground of rejection may be multifarious but it is only the rejection of application, which would give a right to the appellant to file an appeal. the argument of the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on : Sep-01-2016
..... be able to exercise effectively if he is not enlarged on bail as in that case the applicant would find it very difficult to explain to his advocates all those multifarious entries in the account books, various documents and written material. he points out that in this case there are 169 witnesses and voluminous documentary evidence. he submits that proper instructions .....Tag this Judgment!