Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Sorted by: old Year: 1877 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.001 seconds)

1877

Briges Vs. Sperry

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1877

..... awarding partition was proper. 2. that if there is anything in the allegations which concern the partnership which introduces another matter, the objection should have been taken by demurrer for multifariousness. this action was commenced by the complainant, who is a citizen of california, in the district court of the fifth judicial district for the county of san joaquin in that ..... as sufficient for a partition suit. if there is anything in the allegations which concern the partnership which introduces another matter, the objection should have been taken by demurrer for multifariousness. it is not fatal to the bill on appeal. the only question contested in the case on the evidence was whether the land could be partitioned in kind without serious .....

Tag this Judgment!

1877

Dial Vs. Reynolds

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1877

..... law, a court of the united states cannot enjoin a party from proceeding in a state court. 2. a bill of foreclosure is bad for misjoinder of parties and for multifariousness where persons are made defendant thereto who claim title adversely to the mortgagor and the complainant and the latter seeks in that suit to litigate and settle his rights. the ..... mortgagee a party and litigate and settle his rights in that case. barbour, parties in equity 493, and the cases there cited. this case was one of fatal misjoinder and multifariousness, and the proper course for reynolds was to demur. story, eq.pl., sec. 284 b . the complainants not having amended by striking out so much of the bills as related .....

Tag this Judgment!

1877

Dewing Vs. Perdicaries

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1877

..... every thing involved in the controversy. this saved time, expense, circuity of proceedings, perhaps a multiplicity of suits, and promoted the ends of justice. there is clearly no misjoinder or multifariousness in the bill. there are cases in which a corporation having refused to do its duty by suing to avert a threatened wrong, a stockholder was permitted to intervene in ..... , law rep. 1 scotch app. 145. that question would be alien to those arising and proper to be decided in this case. the litigation as to that subject would be multifarious. the rights and claims of all the parties before us, as respects both the corporation and the original stockholders, may therefore well be disposed of in this case. we think .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1877 (PC)

The Empress Vs. Burah and Book Singh

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-26-1877

Reported in : (1878)ILR3Cal64

..... would seem almost impossible in a country like british india, so vast in extent, so various in its population, its laws, and its customs, that the legislature could perform its multifarious duties satisfactorily, without entrusting to the executive government, to the governors of provinces, or to other high officials, and representative bodies, a considerable share in the working out of their .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //