Court : Chennai
Decided on : Sep-12-1973
Reported in : AIR1974Mad375
..... may also make it clear that the conclusion of the trial court on issue no. 4, viz., whether the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties, causes of action and multifariousness as well as on issue no.2 viz., whether the plaintiffs are entitled to refund of a portion of the freight charges, will stand and they are not liable to ..... of action and multifariousness. on issue no. 2, the learned subordinate judge held that the plaintiffs were entitled to refund of a portion of the freight charges. on issues nos. 1 and 3, the ..... to goods was due to vis major and if so whether the defendants are not liable? 4. whether the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties, cause of action and multifariousness? 5. to what relief, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled? the learned subordinate judge found on issue no.4 that the suit was not bad for misjoinder of parties, causes .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-22-1973
Reported in : ILR1973Delhi905
..... reference to a programme of the executive engineer for the period 8th july, 1971 to 30th august, 1971 (o.wi/3) that he was unusually busy in connection with his multifarious official duties, some of which had arisen on account of emergency conditions, and was touring extensively, it is hard to believe that inspire of assistance of a large team of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-02-1973
Reported in : AIR1974Delhi58
..... personally to the commissioner. this would mean placing the commissioner in such a situation where it would lead to the whole work of administration being bogged up. the commissioner has multifarious functions to perform and if it was interpreted that all these requirements of notices etc. are to be delivered personally to him it would mean that he would have to .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-09-1973
Reported in : AIR1973AP264
..... section is intended or provide proceedings of special nature for the purpose of determining questions that relate to the administration of public, religious or charitable trust s and to prevent multifarious and vexatious suits being filed by irresponsible persons against trustees whose duty is to administer such trust.51. it is pertinent to note that it is not section 110 of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-27-1973
Reported in : AIR1973SC1401; 1974(0)BLJR167; [1973(26)FLR454]; 1973LabIC1117; (1973)IILLJ153SC; (1974)3SCC154; 1973(5)LC730(SC)
..... . at the central office the clerk had simply to do the work of posting bonus or provident fund in respective form or register. he did not have to perform the multifarious duties connected with bonus, provident fund, leave with pay and railway fare besides drafting letters for government authorities as had to be done after the introduction of the new system ..... doing the work of provident fund clerks or bonus clerks. the clerks in respect of whom the award had been given were performing duties of a different kind and of multifarious nature, as has been found by the tribunal. on the whole, we are satisfied that there is no such infirmity in the appreciation of evidence which would justify our interferring .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-18-1973
Reported in : 47CompCas689(Cal)
..... statutory organisations. mr. bachawat referred to paragraphs 24 and 25 of the affidavit of rajaram sharma and others. mr. bachawat submitted that the object of the transferee-company is of multifarious and varied nature and it can carry on all kinds of conceivable business. the object clause of the transferee-company is extravagant. unless the members can ascertain the precise nature .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-21-1973
..... the respect due coordinate branches of government; . . . an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a page 413 u. s. 9 political decision already made; [and] the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on on question." " baker v. carr, supra, 369 u.s. at 369 u. s. 217 . . . . any such relief, whether it prescribed standards of training and weaponry .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-06-1973
Reported in : 33STC305(Ker)
..... of various sizes and length. during the assessment year 1965-66, they manufactured 700 mm. pipes, 16 ft. in length and weighing 11/2 tons. these pipes are put to multifarious uses, namely, for pillars, for channels, for engineering and construction purposes, for water supply schemes, road culverts, under tunnels, spouts of irrigation channels, cross masonry works, drainage schemes, etc. during .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-06-1973
Reported in : (1974)IILLJ227Bom
..... employees' union v. gymkhana club, : (1967)iillj720sc , the supreme court has held that the fact that the madras gymkhana club is organised as an industry on a vast scale with multifarious activities and that facilities of accommodation, catering, sale of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, games, etc., are proved and that the club runs parties at which guests are freely entertained .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-21-1973
Reported in : 1973(6)WLN637
..... deposit is made to proceed in the manner indicated thereunder so that the court may be fully discharged from all liability to pay rent to landlord. the section has a multifarious object. it seeks to save the tenant from incurring the risk of being evicted on the ground of default in the payment of rent. in the case of there being .....Tag this Judgment!