Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 1,538 results (0.004 seconds)

Nov 23 2017 (HC)

Most Khoko Mandal and Ors. Vs. Smt Lulu Mandlani and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... payment of requisite court fees on proper valuation of the suit property. the market value of the suit property is not less than 50 lakhs. suit is barred by limitation, multifariousness and also on the principle of estoppel, waiver and acquiescence. description of the suit property is vague and indefinite, plaintiffs have concealed material facts and not come clean before the ..... maintainable? 2. have the plaintiffs got any valid cause of action for the suit? 3. is the suit barred by estoppel, waiver, and acquiescence? 4. is the suit bad for multifariousness? 5. is the suit bad for non joinder of necessary parties? 6. is the suit barred by proviso to s. 34 of the specific relief act? 7. have the plaintiffs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2017 (SC)

M/S Raptakos, Brett Vs. M/S Ganesh Property

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... same defendants on account of several causes of action in one and the same suit. in one case, the multiciplicity of suits is to be avoided and, in the other, multifariousness of the causes of action. it is also clear that the bundle of facts which would constitute the cause of action in favour of the plaintiff would not necessarily be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2017 (HC)

Rajneesh Misra Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... jharkhand.11. we also expect from the state to enact the policy for control of vehicular pollution. some institutional decision ought to have been taken by the state so that multifariousness of such type of future petitions can be avoided.12. it further appears from the orders, passed by this court in this case that under the guise of removal of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2016 (HC)

Sivasubiramaniyampillai Vs. Jothimani and Another

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... dismissed by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff 's appearance, or on the grou nd of nonjoinder of parties or misjoinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2016 (HC)

Jamuna Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the provisions of the hindu marriage act as well as the indian penal code and to avoid subsequent chaos for the distribution of retiral dues, etc and to avoid further multifariousness of the litigations. (xi) it has been held by hon'ble supreme court in the case of khursheed ahmad khan v. state of u.p., reported in (2015) 8 scc439 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2016 (HC)

Pant Nagar Mahatma Phule Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. and Others Vs. State ...

Court : Mumbai

..... bar in the respective statutes referred to hereinabove was attracted and the petitioners plaint came to be rejected. the petitioners, on the basis of misjoinder of alleged causes of action, multifariousness and without compliance with statutory requirements have virtually invited the rejection of their plaint. in these circumstances, at least the petitioners, cannot claim any equities or indulgences in their favour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2015 (HC)

Abdul Gofur Mondal Vs. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissi ...

Court : Guwahati

..... by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff's appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or mis-joinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2015 (HC)

Vaneeta Khanna and Another Vs. Rajiv Gupta and Others

Court : Delhi

..... by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff's appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or mis-joinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2015 (HC)

Nikhil Soni Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... disclosed. it is settled law that no amount of evidence can be looked into for which there are no pleadings. 3. that the writ petition suffers from the defect of multifariousness. neither the necessary parties have been impleaded nor the petition disclose the cause of action. the answering respondents fails to understand as to why union of india or the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Manikkan Vs. Govindaraj

Court : Kerala

..... action should be taken at the earliest opportunity as provided in order i rule 13 and order ii rule 7 of the code. similarly, the objections on the ground of multifariousness also should be taken at the first opportunity by virtue of the aforementioned provisions. the effect of not taking the objection at the earliest possible opportunity has been narrated in ..... action are joined separately against different defendants. this is violation of order ii rule 3 r/w order i rule 3 of the code. such a misjoinder is technically called multifariousness.24. causes of action cannot be joined in a suit filed against several defendants if they are not all jointly interested in the causes of action, unless common questions are .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //