Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1917 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.001 seconds)

Jun 23 1917 (PC)

Afzal Shah and anr. Vs. Lachmi NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-23-1917

Reported in : AIR1918All425; (1918)ILR40All7

..... question the finding of law on which their suit was dismissed by the court below. the pleas in the memorandum of appeal are that the suit is not bad for multifariousness, that it was maintainable as framed and that the reliefs claimed therein could have teen granted in one suit against all the defendants. it is unnecessary for us, as the ..... , and this dismissal has been affirmed by the additional district judge in appeal. the only point dealt with by the lower appellate court was that the suit was bad for multifariousness. as a matter of fact there had been an order by the predecessor in office of the learned judge who finally disposed of the appeal, which was no doubt well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1917 (PC)

Saiyed Afzal Shah and anr. Vs. Lachmi NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-23-1917

Reported in : 42Ind.Cas.856

..... question the finding of law on which their suit was dismissed by the court below. the pleas in the memorandum of appeal are that the suit is not bad for multifariousness, that it was maintainable as framed and that the reliefs claimed therein could have been granted in one suit against all the defendants it is unnecessary for us, as the ..... this dismissal has been affirmed by the additional district judge in appeal.2. the only point dealt with by the lower appellate court was that the suit was bad for multifariousness. as a matter of fact there had been an order by the predecessor in office of the learned judge who finally disposed of the appeal, which was no doubt well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1917 (PC)

Ramendra Nath Ray Vs. Brojendra Nath Dass and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-02-1917

Reported in : 41Ind.Cas.944

..... . 257 25 m. 61 : 11 m. l. j. 233: 3 bom. l. r. 540 : 5 c. w. n. 866 : 2 weir 271 (p. c.) an objection that a suit is multifarious is really an objection that the suit has been constituted, as to joinder of parties and causes of action, in a way not authorized by the law and the rules .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1917 (FN)

Chicago, M. and St.P. Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-04-1917

..... cut and destroyed and for injury done in the course of the construction and operation of such railroad, is cognizable in equity, and a bill praying such relief is not multifarious. the damages assessed against the appellant in this case are in part justified by the terms of the stipulation which it agreed to execute, and in other respects are sustained ..... and operation of its railroad in the reserve. it is objected that the case is not one which is cognizable in a court of equity, and that the bill is multifarious. both branches of the objection are without merit -- so plainly so that a discussion of them would serve no purpose. the assessment of the damages is called in question, but .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //