Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1929 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.001 seconds)

Nov 11 1929 (PC)

Shyam Behari Mal Vs. Maha Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-11-1929

Reported in : AIR1930All180

..... be provided against the evil arising from multifariousness of suits which generally result in waste of time and waste of money. unless the joinder of parties and causes of action are calculated to ..... to dismiss the suit. substantial justice should in no case be allowed to be sacrificed to a wretched technicality. even where the defect of multifariousness is patent on the face of the pleadings the plea cannot be entertained unless it was raised at the earliest possible opportunity. safeguards have to ..... of the case, a remand was neither necessary nor desirable.19. the lower appellate court is emphatic in its pronouncement that 'there undoubtedly is multifariousness in the suit.' this finding has been vehemently assailed by the appellant before this court but there can be no doubt as to its correctness. ..... lower appellate court but there was no adjudication of the issues raised.16. the lower appellate court held that the suit was bad for multifariousness and that having regard to the constitution of the action the suit could not proceed in the form in which it was brought and that ..... property has been transferred to him.13. the lower appellate court was not justified in narrowing down the point under enquiry to the plea of multifariousness. where the settlor is possessed of property which has not been either gifted or endowed, the donee of the property cannot be held to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1929 (PC)

Ram Krishna Sardar Vs. Sree Kanta Mondal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-08-1929

Reported in : AIR1929Cal667

..... of the trial court on the question of fact as to the plaintiff's title and also held that the objection of the defendant that the suit was bad for multifariousness or misjoinder of parties and causes of action must be overruled, as having no substance in it.3. a second appeal has been preferred to this court by defendant 2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1929 (PC)

Asmatulla Pramanik Vs. Gamir Pramanik and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-25-1929

Reported in : 122Ind.Cas.215

..... is true that there were other parties in the suit also claiming paramount titles in respect of the other portions of the property, which would have served to accentuate the multifariousness and confusion to which reference is made, but there is no indication that a court must go into a question of title paramount, even if raised in a mortgage suit ..... be proper parties : they were accordingly dismissed from the suit, and the judicial committee agreed that that was the correct view; otherwise it was said, the suit would have been multifarious and confused in the highest degree if it had gone on in that shape, as the defence raised was quite foreign to the scope of a mortgage suit. certain other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1929 (PC)

Emperor Vs. C.E. Ring

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-31-1929

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR545

..... various points which were urged in relation to the joinder of charges and parties. it is contended that the learned judge should have directed the jury that the charges were multifarious and that the various transactions alleged had no connection one with the others. that would not have been a proper charge for the judge to give to the jury. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //