Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1936 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.001 seconds)

Dec 16 1936 (PC)

Mahant Ramdhan Puri Vs. Chaudhury Lachmi Narain

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-1936

Reported in : (1937)39BOMLR363

..... inconvenience and expense caused to the defendants. the written statement of the present appellants (as is common in india) contained a plea that the suit was bad for misjoinder or multifariousness, but their lordships have not been satisfied that at any time before the commencement of the trial any appropriate and serious application was made to the court upon the face .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1936 (PC)

Official Assignee Vs. R. Krishnaswami Naidu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-28-1936

Reported in : AIR1937Mad192

..... decided is whether the application by the official assignee to set aside a number of alienations made within a period of about one fortnight by the insolvent is bad for multifariousness and whether he should be required to file separate applications in the case of each alienation. my attention has been drawn to various cases on the subject of clubbing in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1936 (PC)

In Re: T. Sadagopa Naidu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-28-1936

Reported in : (1936)71MLJ788

..... decided is whether the application by the official assignee to set aside a number of alienations made within a period of about one fortnight by the insolvent is bad for multifariousness and whether he should be required to file separate applications in the case of each alienation. my attention has been drawn to various cases on the subject of clubbing in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 1936 (PC)

Mahant Ramdhan Puri and Others Vs. Chaudhury Lachmi NaraIn and Others

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Dec-16-1936

..... inconvenience and expense caused to the defendants. the written statement of the present appellants (as is common in india) contained a plea that the suit was bad for misjoinder or multifariousness, but their lordships have not been satisfied that at any time before the commencement of the trial any appropriate and serious application was made to the court upon the face .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //