Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1939 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.003 seconds)

Dec 20 1939 (PC)

Satruhan Singh and ors. Vs. Collector of Gorakhpur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-20-1939

Reported in : AIR1940All205

..... of the case were decided by the lower appellate court in favour of the plaintiffs and all that was said was that the suit of the plaintiffs was bad for multifariousness but that defect did not in any way affect the merits of the case or the jurisdiction of the court. this argument assumes that the trial court had jurisdiction in ..... , for instance, order 1, rule 3 and order 2, rule 3, civil p.c. if he cannot do so and the joinder of such causes of action is bad for multifariousness, then the suit cannot be tried in either of the courts within whose jurisdiction the properties are situate. order 2, rule 3 says thatsave as otherwise provided, a plaintiff may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //