Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1953 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.024 seconds)

Sep 14 1953 (HC)

In Re: D. Lakshminarayana Chettiar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Mad594; (1954)IMLJ403

..... a deceased member of an undivided family for the recovery of family property illegally alienated by him. it was argued that the suit should be dismissed on the ground of multifariousness. in dealing with that argument, the learned judges held that:'it is most desirable that the whole of the alienations should be at once before the court called upon to ..... the same cause of action.'we cannot agree with the learned judges that the cause of action is the same, though such a suit would not now be bad for multifariousness, by reason of order 1, rule 3, civil p. c.48. in 'gangi v. ramaswami', 12 mad lj 103 (z.7), bhashyam aiyangar j. struck a different note which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1953 (HC)

T.B. Mukerji Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-18-1953

Reported in : AIR1954All501

..... question is not whether it would take place in practice but what the legislature permits. certainly the rule is not 'the more the merrier'. nor is that the greater the multifariousness of charges and persons the more is the trial legal. take another instance. suppose a and b in one transaction commit an offence of section 323, a and c in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 1953 (HC)

Rameshwar Dayal Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-08-1953

Reported in : AIR1954HP21

..... thinking that the prosecution evidence had been acted upon by the trying magistrate. on the contrary, the trying magistrate regarded that evidence as of a doubtful nature due to the multifarious discrepancies on material points. that being so, it was incumbent upon the learned sessions judge to scrutinize that evidence carefully before arriving at the contrary conclusion that the depositions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1953 (HC)

Kanhaiyalal Sewaram Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-06-1953

Reported in : 1954CriLJ6

..... wrong'. this may mean nothing.the learned judge did not care to arrive at the finding whether it was a case of general or partial insanity, whether the delusions were multifarious and of the wildest and most irrational character, abundantly indicating that the mind was diseased throughout or, while the mind may have been overpowered by delusions, though may be the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1953 (HC)

Raj NaraIn Singh Vs. Atmaram Govind and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-1953

Reported in : AIR1954All319

..... . they are enjoyed by most democratic legislatures which look to it for inspiration and their members individually. they are regarded as essential for the adequate performance of the high and multifarious functions assigned to the houses--functions which as a part of a sovereign legislature naturally exceed those possessed by other bodies or individuals. parliamentary privilege is, indeed, to use the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1953 (HC)

State Vs. Radhagobinda Das and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-09-1953

Reported in : AIR1954Ori1

..... was not then aware of the far reaching effect of the contents of the letter. while we appreciate the position that the district magistrate had to pay attention to the multifarious duties arising during the course of his functions as the executive head of the district, it is not possible for us to ignore his responsibilities of paying adequate attention and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //