Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.002 seconds)

Apr 14 1958 (HC)

Seth Roshan Lal Etc. Vs. Dewan Bhagwan Das

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-14-1958

Reported in : AIR1959P& H367

..... grounds (a) that the tribunal at delhi had no jurisdiction because, excepting govind ram, the remaining judgment-debtors were residing outside its territorial jurisdiction, (b) that it was bad for multifariousness because one application had been made in relation to a debt that had already been split up into there and in fact the creditor should have made three separate applications ..... civil procedure are attracted and the learned tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that it had jurisdiction against all the judgment-debtors in this case.the question of multifariousness is also connected with the question of jurisdiction because the substance of the argument of the learned counsel for the judgment-debtors is that if separate applications had been brought ..... held decrees was to gain an advantage over them to attract the jurisdiction of the delhi tribunal and in fact in that he succeeded. the application is, therefore, bad for multifariousness, but if this was the sole defect, i agree on the basis of it the claim of the creditor could not possibly be defeated.11. in so far as govind .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1958 (HC)

Sajjanam Wadla China Rajayya Vs. Chappal Venkateshwar Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP349

..... to bring fresh suits, as has been the case in 'the three authorities cited by the advocate for the defendants. when the court insisted that the suit was bad for multifariousness, the pleader for the plaintiff merely expressed his willingness to continue the suit as against the 2nd defendant,thereupon the court did not order the suit to 'be withdrawn but ..... two sets of defendants for recovery of money due to him by the defendants on babi khata accounts.a preliminary objection was taken to the plaint on the ground of multifariousness. the trial court expressed the opinion that the defect in the frame of the suit was there and actually ordered that the plaintiff should elect as to which of the ..... remaining, names. the plaintiff is given time of three days to produce fresh plaints.'there is no controversy that if the trial judge had dismissed the suit as framed, for multifarious ness and the plaintiff had brought fresh separate suits against each of the defendants, he would not have been handicapped by the provisions of rule 2, of order 23, order ..... the principal debtor.5. it would thus be seen that their lordships were dealing with a case which was properly constituted as originally framed and in which' no question of multifariousness was involved. had it been allowed to proceed as such it might have resulted iii a decree against the four trustees or any of them. the plaintiffs by having their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1958 (HC)

Al.Sp.Pl. Thirunavukkarasu Chettiar and ors. Vs. State of Madras by th ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ596

..... ) what was the real character and what are the legal incidents of the restoration of the said private properties in the year 1862?(4) whether the suit is bad for multifariousness?(5) whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of the tenants?(6) whether the plaintiffs are estopped from contending that the villages are not 'estates' for all or any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1958 (HC)

Sohan Lal and anr. Vs. Smt. Bindeshwari Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-23-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All419

..... . this, however, should mark the limit of his sphere of representation. to allow him to go further, and to collect all the assets of the deceased might result in creating multifarious difficulties. it is possible to contemplate instances in which the acceptance of the contention advanced on behalf of the opposite party might lead to insuperable difficulties.thus, for instance, if .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1958 (HC)

Bejay Laxmi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. the State of W.B. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-12-1958

Reported in : AIR1960Cal113,62CWN640

..... matter. in the administration of government in this country the functions which are given to ministers (and constitutionally properly given to ministers because they are constitutionally responsible) are functions so multifarious that no minister could ever personally attend to them. to take the example of the present case no doubt there have been thousands of requisitions in this country by individual .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1958 (HC)

Katihar Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Shri Lachminarayan Jute Manufacturing Co. ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Cal501

..... delivery of it on such payment.13. i have referred to some of the points taken by the respondent before arbitrators in order to give the background of frivolous and multifarious contentions, by reference to which their alleged misconduct of denying assistance and facilities to the respondent in regard to the production of some material evidence on which it was relying .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1958 (HC)

Prabhucharan Vs. Shiv Dutt

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-20-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP299

..... smt. rama mitra who polled 21,318 votes.the main contention on behalf of the appellant, (which was the same in the tribunal below), is that by the allotment of multifarious symbols to the so-called socialist party there was confusion in the voting and the voters were not able to cast their votes as they would otherwise have, and that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1958 (HC)

B.N. Elias and Co. Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. G.P. Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal339,63CWN347

..... piecemeal references of allied disputes should be avoided. had the government referred the dispute as to both the basic scale of pay and the dearness allowance by the same reference, multifarious references and multiplicity of proceedings would have been avoided.19. the appeal is dismissed. the parties will bear their own costs of the appeal.20. k.c. das gupta, c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //