Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 10 results (0.001 seconds)

Jul 09 1960 (HC)

Kanhaiyalal Vs. Keshodas

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-09-1960

Reported in : AIR1961MP46; 1962MPLJ15

..... subject matter from that of the other defendants. if no connection or conspiracy is alleged to exist between the various persons joined as defendants, the suit will be bad for multifariousness. otherwise, if a common suit is permitted against two or more defendants when there is no nexus inter se, it will only lead to obscurity and confusion the policy of ..... ordershiv dayal, j. 1. this revision is directed against an order passed by the trial judge holding that the suit was bad for multifariousness. he gave the plaintiff an option to elect one of the two defendants against whom he wanted to continue the suit2. the allegations in the plaint were that the plaintiff .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1960 (HC)

Ram Sarup and ors. Vs. Shikhar Chand and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-13-1960

Reported in : AIR1961All221

..... limited power into an un-limited power. it seems to me that the three phrases were used, because each of them represent the three well-recognised heads under which the multifarious grounds of interference are generally grouped in law viz.,1st, that the decision is illegal, i.e. against law;2nd, that the decision is irregular, i.e. against procedure; and3rd ..... confusion, uncertainty and friction in the running of the system devised by the act. it nullifies the intention of the legislature and defeats its avowed purposes. the effect of the multifarious considerations that arise in the matter and are referred to by me above is to lead me to the irresistable conclusion that in the present case the order of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1960 (HC)

In Re: Bilasrai Juharmal and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1960

Reported in : AIR1962Bom133; (1961)63BOMLR815; [1962]32CompCas215(Bom)

..... vires. at any rate, all the surrounding circumstances would require investigation. fresh clauses were framed to meet this difficulty, and the result is the modern memorandum of association with its multifarious list of objects and powers specified as objects and its clauses designed to prevent any specified object being read as ancillary to some other object. for the purpose of determining ..... the argument which h is advancing. it is true that while lord wrenbury has deplored, or we can even say deprcated, the practice which has recently grown up of including multifarious objects as independent objects or as objects put down after 'without prejudice' preamble, lord wrenbury stated that he had to reconcile himself with this practice much against his conviction and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1960 (HC)

Savitri Devi Vs. Rajul Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-10-1960

Reported in : AIR1961All245

..... court of the last resort. they therefore used all the three expressions together for the purpose of embracing within the ambit of this provision of law the entire range of multifarious forms in which the claims are initiated and finally adjudicated by the courts of law. whatever their intention might have been, one thing that is clear is that they intended .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 1960 (SC)

The State of Punjab Vs. Sodhi Sukhdev Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-15-1960

Reported in : AIR1961SC493; [1961]2SCR371

..... the entire business of state. it takes in the routine day-to-day administration and also highly confidential acts involving defence and foreign relations, and also in modern times the multifarious activities of a welfare state. the object of the section is simply to prohibit the use of undisclosed documents of state in evidence by persons who in the course of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1960 (SC)

Ballabhdas Agarwala Vs. J.C. Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-1960

Reported in : AIR1960SC576; 1960CriLJ752; [1960]2SCR739

..... is invested with a legal personality by the statute under which it is created. the statute gives it perpetual succession and a power to act in many ways. among, its multifarious functions is an inherent power to sue or be sued by its corporate name, but the statutes creating such corporations aggregate provide expressly for such power. in the absence of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1960 (SC)

Vasantlal Maganbhai Sanjanwala Vs. the State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-1960

Reported in : AIR1961SC4; (1961)63BOMLR138; 1978CriLJ1281; [1961]1SCR341

..... is the determination of the legislative policy and its formulation as a rule of conduct. obviously it cannot abdicate its functions in favour of another. but in view of the multifarious activities of a welfare state, it cannot presumably work out all the details to suit the varying aspects of a complex situation. it must necessarily delegate the working out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1960 (HC)

Rajkot Motor Transport Co. (Private) Ltd. Vs. the Appellate Committee ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-24-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Guj89; (1961)GLR211

..... made under the act as mr. hathi in effect wants us to do. the present contention seems to us to be untenable and must be rejected.7. another of the multifarious contentions mr. hathi has thought it necessary to urge before us is that the judgment of the regional transport authority was signed only by the secretary and the chairman. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1960 (HC)

Lawang Tahang Vs. Goenka Commercial Bank Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-17-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Cal144,[1961]31CompCas45(Cal),64CWN828

..... vires. at any rate, all the surrounding circumstances would require investigation. fresh clauses were framed to meet this difficulty, and the result is the modem memorandum of association with its multifarious list of objects and powers specified as objects and its clauses designed to prevent any specified object being read as ancillary to some other object. for the purpose of determining .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1960 (HC)

The State Vs. Gurdial Singh Gill and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-18-1960

Reported in : AIR1961P& H77

..... the complainant necessary, there is nothing to debar them from ordering the complainant to be present at a particular hearing, but to insist that a busy public servant who has multifarious duties to discharge should attend each and every complaint filed in his name would result in delaying the proceedings and would certainly be not in the interest of justice.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //