Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1961 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.001 seconds)

Apr 13 1961 (HC)

Deo Sansthan Chinchwad and ors. Vs. Chintaman Dharnidhar Deo and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Bom214; (1961)63BOMLR692; ILR1962Bom101

..... proper steps to assert their claim in the land acquisition proceedings.(3) on these pleadings, several issues were framed. the trial court held that the suit was not bad for multifariousness inasmuch as both the plaintiffs claimed a right to receive rs. 150 out of the vasool from the village of chincholi by grant and judicial decisions, whereas plaintiff no. 1 ..... . 2 came to be struck off from the suit as he had been removed from the office. the other contentions of the defendants were that the suit was bad for multifariousness, that plaintiff had no title to receive rs. 417-4-0 out of the vasool of the village of chincholi; that the prior proceedings were not binding on defendant no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1961 (HC)

Balak and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-26-1961

Reported in : AIR1962All208

..... an area of 113.78 acres. petitioners nos. 34, 37, 48, 52 and 54 to 60 are tenants of land measuring 2 acres. the petition is defective on account of multifariousness. there is, however, reason to believe that 53 petitioners are interested in challenging the acquisition proceedings relating to the area of 113,78 acres. i invited mr. s.c. khare .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1961 (HC)

Daulatram Agarwalla Vs. Champalal Jugraj

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-22-1961

Reported in : AIR1963Cal337,66CWN364

..... of the law of procedure. there are circumstances where such joinder is forbidden; but where, within the limits prescribed, several causes of action are joined which do not bring about multifariousness, joinder is permissible and the suit may well proceed to judgment.43. the question whether amendment can be allowed in a given case is always a matter for the exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 1961 (HC)

Board of Revenue, Madras Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Madras V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-1961

Reported in : AIR1961Mad504; (1961)2MLJ538

..... 38 schedule 1-a of the act. the question for consideration before us is whether this view is correct.9. it is obvious that the document is a multipurpose or multifarious document representing the purported settlement between the executants of their mutual claims inter se arising out of several transactions by way of partnerships, joint acquisitions, joint ventures and other common .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1961 (SC)

Smt. Ujjam Bai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-1961

Reported in : [1963]1SCR778; [1963]Supp2SCR778

..... it be said that sales-tax authorities under the act are judicial tribunals in the sense they are courts in a welfare state the governments is called upon to discharge multifarious duties affecting every aspect of human activity. this extension of the governmental activity necessitated the entrusting of many executive authorities with power to decide rights of parties. they are really ..... in effect promises to usher in a welfare state for our country; and in such a state the legislature has necessarily to create innumerable administrative tribunals, and entrust them with multifarious functions. they will have powers to interfere with every aspect of human activity. if their existence is necessary for the progress of our country, the abuse of power by them .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 1961 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Dhanalakshmi Corporation.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-04-1961

Reported in : [1962]46ITR1031(Mad)

..... -tax officer himself show that, though the firm ceased its oil mill business, it was yet engaged in a course of profit-making by means of these advances. of the multifarious activities which the firm engaged in, this particular activity was kept on. there is also the circumstance that the income so derived by the assessee was submitted as its business .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1961 (HC)

Sadhu Singh S. Mulla Singh Vs. District Board, Gurdaspur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-09-1961

Reported in : AIR1962P& H204

..... is the determination of the legislative policy and its formulation as a rule of conduct. obviously it cannot abdicate its functions in favour of another. but in view of the multifarious activities of a welfare state, it cannot presumably work out all the details to suit the varying aspects of a complex situation. it must necessarily delegate the working out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 1961 (SC)

Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Shri Jai Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-20-1961

Reported in : AIR1961SC1183; [1961(3)FLR371]; (1961)IILLJ644SC; [1962]3SCR684; [1960]11STC793(SC)

..... not be commenced before the beginning of september, 1955, because of my continued ill health which necessitated complete rest for several weeks at a time and also because of my multifarious assignments which took me many a time to patna and outside the state of bihar. i could not assign the matter of holding the enquiries to other officers namely chief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //