Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1962 Page 1 of about 10 results (0.001 seconds)

Jul 06 1962 (HC)

Onkareppa Wasappa Koloor Vs. Rachappa Gurushantappa Jagalalli and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Mys159; ILR1962KAR809

..... to insist upon the plaintiff bringing two separate sets of suit for that purpose which would only result in dilatoriness and delay. in my opinion, far from there being any multifariousness in the suit, it is the order of the court below which will result in multiplicity of proceedings.9. this revision petition is allowed, the order made by the court ..... confine his suit to only some of the reliefs prayed for by him, and be asked this direction to be made on the ground that the suit is bad for multifariousness.4. what was urged before the court below was that the suit in so far as it asked for the eviction of defendant 4 was based on the provisions of ..... ordera.r. somnath iyer, j.1. whether the plaintiff's suit is bad for multifariousness is the question which arises in this revision petition which is presented by the plaintiff.2. the property which is the subject-matter of the suit in the court below .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1962 (HC)

Sm. Siba Rani Devi and ors. Vs. Ramendra Nath Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-17-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Cal46,66CWN828

..... exclude the general provision (section 7(iv)(c) ).35. in that view, the point under section 17 also would not arise as the suit would not be a multiple or multifarious suit or a suit for multiple reliefs as contemplated in that section.36. in the light of the above, the decision in ilr 29 pat 219 : (air 1951 pat 633 ..... involves a declaration of title in respect of strangers. therefore, the suit is bad, because (a) different causes of action have been joined together and the suit is bad for multifariousness and (b) the suit is really one for confirmation of possession against the strangers. in my opinion there is no substance in either of these points. as long as it ..... that all the defendants were not interested in a partition of all the properties mentioned in the plaint and the suit was bad for misjoinder of defendants as also for multifariousness. these contentions were negatived, and it was held that in a partition suit, the co-sharers may be made defendants as well as strangers. it is not the law that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1962 (HC)

Surendra Bahadur Singh Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-03-1962

Reported in : AIR1962All456

..... the, competence to initiate and have conducted the so-called magisterial enquiry, that under the law magisterial enquiry is unwarranted and that the magisterial enquiry which was being made was multifarious and omnibus in nature and was against law.6. the sessions judge held that the sub-divisional magistrate to whom the enquiry was entrusted is enquiring into the matter as ..... even the sub-divisional magistrate, utraula, had no power or jurisdiction to hold the enquiry in the manner he is proceeding. then the learned sessions judge held that there is multifariousness and misjoinder of charges in this enquiry, that the law contemplates that a man can be tried for only one transaction in each trial and that since a large number .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1962 (SC)

Laxman Balwant Bhopatkar (Since Deceased) by Another Trustee Dr. Dhana ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1962

Reported in : AIR1962SC1589; (1963)65BOMLR349; [1963]2SCR625

..... , for besides the vagueness involved in the description of the activity as 'conducive to the national ideal etc.', there is a further vagueness introduced by the words 'other multifarious public activities'. one mode of testing the validity of this object would be whether one could uphold the deed as constituting a valid enforceable charitable purpose if it had merely ..... of the first clause referring to 'the spreading of political education through the newspapers and thereby making people alive to their political rights' and secondly 'the carrying on other multifarious public activities conducive to the national ideal' were really meant as illustrations of activities undertaken by the late lokmanya during his life-time as is manifest by the use of ..... object the lokmanya sought to achieve through the two newspapers was that of spreading political education and thereby making the people alive to their political rights and carrying out other multifarious public activities conducive to the national ideal. 14. pausing here, it is necessary to mention that though the object of the trust was thus intimately bound up with ..... charge of the newspapers - the kesari and maratha such as of spreading political education through the newspapers and thereby making people alive to their political rights and carrying on other multifarious public activities conducive to the national ideal etc.' 9. pausing here, is it necessary to mention that the translation as it appears in the paper book reads 'such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1962 (FN)

Baker Vs. Carr

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-26-1962

..... without expressing lack of the respect due coordinate branches of government; or an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made; or the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question. unless one of these formulations is inextricable from the case at bar, there should be no dismissal for nonjusticiability on the ground of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1962 (HC)

Sundarabai Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-1962

Reported in : AIR1967Bom203; (1963)65BOMLR821; ILR1964Bom1

..... is the determination of the legislative policy and its formulation as a rule of conduct. obviously it cannot abdicate its functions in favour of another. but in view of the multifarious activities of a welfare state, it cannot presumably work out all the details to suit the varying aspects of a complex situation. it must necessarily delegate the working out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1962 (SC)

A.V. Thomas and Co. Ltd., Alleppey Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-25-1962

Reported in : [1963]Supp(1)SCR776

..... of income-tax (bangalore) kerala, is the respondent. 3. the assessee company was incorporated in 1935 and, as is usual with companies, its memorandum of association authorised it to do multifarious business. according to clauses 1, 5, 18, and 23, it was authorised 'to be interested in, to promote, and to undertake the formation and establishment of other companies', to make .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1962 (HC)

M.V. Gopalan Vs. State of Madras, Represented by the Regional Providen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-03-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Mad134; (1963)ILLJ52Mad

..... activities, (to sustain the primary activity) which may fall within schedule 1, cannot attract the applicability of the act. the learned judge was not certainly dealing with a factory comprising multifarious industries, some within and some outside the act. this decision of balakrishna aiyar j. has been affirmed on letters, patent appeal by a division bench in the decision reported in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1962 (HC)

Baijnath Vs. Ramadhar and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-19-1962

Reported in : AIR1963All214

..... decoration. other trees may be grown for the purpose of providing fire-wood, such as dhak trees. thus classifications of trees even according to their primary nature are manifold and multifarious. sometimes the trees are grown for more than one purpose. further, as already observed, the meaning of 'timber' has now been extended to cover trees the wood of which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1962 (SC)

A. Vs. Thomas and Co. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-25-1962

Reported in : [1963]48ITR67(SC)

..... commissioner of income-tax (bangalore), kerala, is the respondent.the assessee company was incorporated in 1935 and, as is usual with companies, its memorandum of association authorised it to do multifarious business. according to clauses 1, 5, 18, and 23 it was authorised 'to be interested in, to promote and to undertake the formation and establishment of other companies', to make .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //