Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.031 seconds)

Nov 17 1969 (HC)

Mata Prasad and ors. Vs. Shri Sahdeo Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-17-1969

Reported in : 1970CriLJ1680

..... the opinion that the order of the magistrate dated 7-11-1968 was wholly illegal. the application which was moved by the present applicants and chhotey lal clearly suffered from multifariousness because of the 28 applicants who had joined in one application under section 145, code of criminal procedure claiming possession over separate and distinct portions of land and secondly because ..... he started the proceedings on the basis of the application jointly made by 28 persons which in this way suffered from multifariousness and in proceedings on the basis of such a faulty application he started proceedings which themselves suffered from multifariousness. the proceedings therefore wore clearly illegal. the case is clearly covered by the observations made by this court in the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1969 (HC)

Virendra Saigal Vs. Sumatilal Jamnalal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi14

..... by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff's appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or mis-joinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Mahmmad Salim Vs. Nabian Bibi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1886)ILR8All282

..... , though the exact point with which i am now dealing was not decided. then as to the question of dismissal of the former suit on the ground of misjoinder or multifariousness, i need only cite fateh singh v. lachmi kooer 13 b.l.r. ap. 37 which is an authority for saying that such a dismissal does not operate as res .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Mul Chand Vs. Shib Charan Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All676

..... which embraces two or more distinct subjects under separate causes of action, which might or ought to have been made subject of separate suits, in fact, when the suit is multifarious and of the nature of those referred to in section 9, act viii of 1859, and section 45, act x of 1877.8. in this view, i am of opinion ..... each cause had not been so united in the same suit, but had been taken into court by a separate plaint or memorandum of appeal.oldfield, j.7. the words 'multifarious suits' in the margin of section 17, court fees act, and the reference in the last part of the section to section 9, act viii of 1859, with which part ..... was admitted at the hearing, and indeed, looking at the marginal note to section 17 of the court fees act, it could not be denied, that the section refers to multifarious suits. the wording of section 17 of the court pees act, 'where a suit embraces two or more distinct subjects,' may be read with section 45, act x of 1877 ..... enough that the distinct subjects should be merely separate and distinct matters embraced in the claim:' and i remain entirely of the same opinion. this section 17 plainly relates to multifarious suits which are allowable by section 45 of the code of procedure, act x of 1877, a circumstance which appears to me to supply us at once with the principle .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Ram Dai Vs. Chamaili Rani

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All552

..... the suit is liable, if a separate suit were brought, is first to be ascertained and then the aggregate amount of all the items is to be charged. the words 'multifarious suits' in the margin have no reference to section 8* of act viii of 1859 in the sense suggested by the learned pleader for appellant, that we are to read .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Chedi Lal and anr. Vs. Kirath Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All682

..... opinion in the reference regarding first appeal no. 15 of 1879, mul chand, plaintiff (see ante p. 676), would govern this case.7. the suit does not appear to be multifarious within the term of section 17 of the court fees act. it is one for immoveable property, and a claim for arrears of rent in respect of the property claimed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1969 (HC)

State Vs. D. Rudra, A.D.M. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-01-1969

Reported in : AIR1969Cal602,1969CriLJ1487

..... blame in our view, should squarely rest on the state government which puts such young officers without any experience whatsoever in judicial work, as additional district magistratesand burdens them with multifarious miscellaneous work, thereby betraying lack of appreciation of the importance of administration of criminal justice. in olden times, senior deputy magistrates with experience in judicial work were drafted for such ..... be necessary in controlling the staff at alipore and to saddle them with that responsibility for carrying on the judicial administration of the district and further to burden them with multifarious executive duties is hardly expected to yield better results. naturally they depended too much upon the judicial peshkar who it seems, could get any order signed by them j they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1969 (FN)

Powell Vs. Mccormack

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-16-1969

..... , we have seen, requires an interpretation of the constitution -- a determination for which clearly there are "judicially . . . manageable standards." finally, a judicial resolution of petitioners' claim will not result in "multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question." for, as we noted in baker v. carr, supra, at 369 u. s. 211 , it is the responsibility of this court to act ..... respect due coordinate branches of government; or an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made; or the potentiality page 395 u. s. 519 of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question." 369 u.s. at 369 u. s. 217 . respondents' first contention is that this case presents a political question because, under art. i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1969 (HC)

Sayaji Mills Ltd. Vs. P.A. Bhaskar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-25-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Bom418; (1970)72BOMLR312; [1971(21)FLR110]; ILR1970Bom787; 1970MhLJ579

..... they had brought in fresh capital or had renovated the old machinery or had purchased new machinery. pleadings are not evidence, and therefore, we cannot assume the existence of the multifarious facts on which the plaintiffs' counsel relies.15. the importance of considerations such as those referred to by the plaintiffs in paragraph 3 of the plaint is that whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Raghunandan Prasad Vs. Ramphal Rai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All498

..... public nuisances which need not be referred to for the purposes of this case. but the principles upon which the english law of tort proceeds in respect of all the multifarious classes of public nuisances are identical, and those principles do not so much relate to the right as to the form of the remedy. in england and also in america .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //