Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1972 Page 2 of about 17 results (0.001 seconds)

Nov 10 1972 (HC)

Bhanwar Lal and anr. Vs. Dhanraj

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-10-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Raj212; 1972()WLN999

..... market. the plaintiff's case in brief was that the construction of the shop over the chabutra by the defendant has caused discomfort amounting to nuisance to the plaintiff in multifarious ways; firstly it resulted in diminishing the light and air which the plantiffs' shop used to receive when the chabutra was open; secondly the impugned construction created an obstruc-tion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1972 (HC)

C.A. Khaja Mohidden Sahib and ors. Vs. the Madras State Wakf Board and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Mad104

..... of persons, that they are entitled to file one suit as a group. if the cause of action for each of them were different that suit will become bad for multifariousness and it will be open for attack on other grounds as well. in the decision reported in 74 ind app 223 air 1947 pc 197 the privy council clearly held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1972 (HC)

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. the Hindustan Lever Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-08-1972

Reported in : AIR1972All486

..... person, to search him and seize property are sovereign powers.21. on facts the position in the present case is that the government was running a sub-treasury at which multifarious activities were undertaken. one of the activities was that the sub-treasury received moneys from private individuals for being credited to the account of the departments of the central government .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1972 (HC)

Mange Ram and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-04-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H142

..... and in view of the common grounds sought to be urged by both the petitioners. it cannot be said that the petition is liable to be dismissed on account of multifariousness or misjoinder of petitioners.5. the second objection of mr. hooda is really responsible for the petition having been admitted to a division bench in the very first instance. according .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1972 (HC)

C.A. Khaja Mohideen Sahib and ors. Vs. the Madras State Wakf Board Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1972

Reported in : (1972)2MLJ222

..... group of persons they are entitled to file one suit as a group. if the cause of action for each of them were different the suit will become bad for multifariousness and it will be open for attack on other grounds as well. in the decision reported in al. ar. vellayan chettiar (deceased) v. government of madras (1947) 74 i.a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1972 (HC)

Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg.) Company Limited Vs. the Assist ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-1972

Reported in : [1973]31STC9(MP)

..... is the determination of the legislative policy and its formulation as a rule of conduct. obviously it cannot abdicate its functions in favour of another. but in view of the multifarious activities of a welfare state, it cannof'presumably work out all the details to suit the varying aspects of a complex situation. it must necessarily delegate the working out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1972 (HC)

The Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Harasaran Dass and Sons and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Delhi258

..... such a position. that apart, this certainly would result in multiplicity of proceedings. the only bar to such jointer is that the court has to see that there is no multifariousness. when there is misguide of parties and cause of action, which certainly would cause embarrassment and the trial of the action would be prejudiced ......... in the suit, as framed, it .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //