Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1972 Page 2 of about 17 results (0.001 seconds)

Feb 18 1972 (HC)

Vidarbha Housing Board Vs. Income-tax Officer, City and Refund Circle, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-1972

Reported in : [1973]92ITR430(Bom); 1972MhLJ826

..... rejected the petitioner-board's preliminary objections raised under section 11 of the 1961 act. he has pointed out that respondent no. 1 has stated that in view of the multifarious activities for profit, the board has engaged itself for profit and the income of the board was not covered by section 11 of the income-tax act, 1961. respondent no .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1972 (HC)

The State of Haryana Vs. Mansa Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-03-1972

Reported in : 1973CriLJ386

..... the complainant necessary, there is nothing to debar them from ordering the complainant to be present at a particular hearing, but to insist that a busy public servant who has multifarious duties to discharge should attend each and every complaint filed in his name would result in delaying the proceedings and would certainly be not in the interest of justice.4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1972 (HC)

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. the Hindustan Lever Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-08-1972

Reported in : AIR1972All486

..... person, to search him and seize property are sovereign powers.21. on facts the position in the present case is that the government was running a sub-treasury at which multifarious activities were undertaken. one of the activities was that the sub-treasury received moneys from private individuals for being credited to the account of the departments of the central government .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1972 (HC)

Mange Ram and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-04-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H142

..... and in view of the common grounds sought to be urged by both the petitioners. it cannot be said that the petition is liable to be dismissed on account of multifariousness or misjoinder of petitioners.5. the second objection of mr. hooda is really responsible for the petition having been admitted to a division bench in the very first instance. according .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1972 (HC)

C.A. Khaja Mohideen Sahib and ors. Vs. the Madras State Wakf Board Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1972

Reported in : (1972)2MLJ222

..... group of persons they are entitled to file one suit as a group. if the cause of action for each of them were different the suit will become bad for multifariousness and it will be open for attack on other grounds as well. in the decision reported in al. ar. vellayan chettiar (deceased) v. government of madras (1947) 74 i.a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1972 (HC)

Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg.) Company Limited Vs. the Assist ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-1972

Reported in : [1973]31STC9(MP)

..... is the determination of the legislative policy and its formulation as a rule of conduct. obviously it cannot abdicate its functions in favour of another. but in view of the multifarious activities of a welfare state, it cannof'presumably work out all the details to suit the varying aspects of a complex situation. it must necessarily delegate the working out of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1972 (HC)

The Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Harasaran Dass and Sons and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Delhi258

..... such a position. that apart, this certainly would result in multiplicity of proceedings. the only bar to such jointer is that the court has to see that there is no multifariousness. when there is misguide of parties and cause of action, which certainly would cause embarrassment and the trial of the action would be prejudiced ......... in the suit, as framed, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //