Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.001 seconds)

Sep 12 1973 (HC)

K.R. Rajamanickam Chettiar and ors. Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-12-1973

Reported in : AIR1974Mad375

..... may also make it clear that the conclusion of the trial court on issue no. 4, viz., whether the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties, causes of action and multifariousness as well as on issue no.2 viz., whether the plaintiffs are entitled to refund of a portion of the freight charges, will stand and they are not liable to ..... of action and multifariousness. on issue no. 2, the learned subordinate judge held that the plaintiffs were entitled to refund of a portion of the freight charges. on issues nos. 1 and 3, the ..... to goods was due to vis major and if so whether the defendants are not liable? 4. whether the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties, cause of action and multifariousness? 5. to what relief, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled? the learned subordinate judge found on issue no.4 that the suit was not bad for misjoinder of parties, causes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1973 (HC)

Kishan Singh Vs. Kewal Raj and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-21-1973

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN637

..... deposit is made to proceed in the manner indicated thereunder so that the court may be fully discharged from all liability to pay rent to landlord. the section has a multifarious object. it seeks to save the tenant from incurring the risk of being evicted on the ground of default in the payment of rent. in the case of there being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1973 (SC)

The State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Khan Chand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-1973

Reported in : AIR1974SC543; (1974)1SCC549; [1974]2SCR768

..... . often it is practically useless to lodge power in a public functionary without giving him a large measure of discretion, for, the situations which might arise in public affairs are multifarious and very often unpredictable and unforeseen. there is always a potential danger in vesting any discretionary power in any person as it is liable to be abused or exercised in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 1973 (SC)

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-1973

Reported in : AIR1973SC1401; 1974(0)BLJR167; [1973(26)FLR454]; 1973LabIC1117; (1973)IILLJ153SC; (1974)3SCC154; 1973(5)LC730(SC)

..... . at the central office the clerk had simply to do the work of posting bonus or provident fund in respective form or register. he did not have to perform the multifarious duties connected with bonus, provident fund, leave with pay and railway fare besides drafting letters for government authorities as had to be done after the introduction of the new system ..... doing the work of provident fund clerks or bonus clerks. the clerks in respect of whom the award had been given were performing duties of a different kind and of multifarious nature, as has been found by the tribunal. on the whole, we are satisfied that there is no such infirmity in the appreciation of evidence which would justify our interferring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 1973 (FN)

Gilligan Vs. Morgan

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-21-1973

..... the respect due coordinate branches of government; . . . an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a page 413 u. s. 9 political decision already made; [and] the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on on question." " baker v. carr, supra, 369 u.s. at 369 u. s. 217 . . . . any such relief, whether it prescribed standards of training and weaponry .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1973 (HC)

Indian Sailors' Home Society Vs. R.D. Tulpule and Anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-06-1973

Reported in : (1974)IILLJ227Bom

..... employees' union v. gymkhana club, : (1967)iillj720sc , the supreme court has held that the fact that the madras gymkhana club is organised as an industry on a vast scale with multifarious activities and that facilities of accommodation, catering, sale of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, games, etc., are proved and that the club runs parties at which guests are freely entertained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1973 (HC)

Y.K. Mathur and anr. Vs. the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Del ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-02-1973

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi58

..... personally to the commissioner. this would mean placing the commissioner in such a situation where it would lead to the whole work of administration being bogged up. the commissioner has multifarious functions to perform and if it was interpreted that all these requirements of notices etc. are to be delivered personally to him it would mean that he would have to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1973 (HC)

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. Keral ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-06-1973

Reported in : [1974]33STC305(Ker)

..... of various sizes and length. during the assessment year 1965-66, they manufactured 700 mm. pipes, 16 ft. in length and weighing 11/2 tons. these pipes are put to multifarious uses, namely, for pillars, for channels, for engineering and construction purposes, for water supply schemes, road culverts, under tunnels, spouts of irrigation channels, cross masonry works, drainage schemes, etc. during .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 1973 (HC)

United Bank of India Ltd. Vs. United India Credit and Development Comp ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-18-1973

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)

..... statutory organisations. mr. bachawat referred to paragraphs 24 and 25 of the affidavit of rajaram sharma and others. mr. bachawat submitted that the object of the transferee-company is of multifarious and varied nature and it can carry on all kinds of conceivable business. the object clause of the transferee-company is extravagant. unless the members can ascertain the precise nature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1973 (HC)

Paleru Venkateswarlu and ors. Vs. Potina Venkateswarulu and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-09-1973

Reported in : AIR1973AP264

..... section is intended or provide proceedings of special nature for the purpose of determining questions that relate to the administration of public, religious or charitable trust s and to prevent multifarious and vexatious suits being filed by irresponsible persons against trustees whose duty is to administer such trust.51. it is pertinent to note that it is not section 110 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //