Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.003 seconds)

Mar 14 1974 (HC)

Sant Singh and ors. Vs. Des Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-14-1974

Reported in : AIR1974P& H276

..... that the right to relief alleged to exist against the respondents arises not out of the same act or transaction or series of acts and transactions. the suit is, therefore, multifarious and one not permitted by rule.3.8. for the reasons stated, the impugned order is affirmed and the petition is dismissed with costs. the records shall be transmitted at ..... transaction, etc; was alleged to exist and that, therefore, the provisions of rule 3 above extracted were not applicable to this cease. the finding given was that the suit was multifarious and it is that finding which is challenged by the petitioners.7. i have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and am of he opinion that no fault can be ..... in the case on the 16th of november, 1972. issue no. 1 which was treated as a preliminary issue runs thus:'whether the suit of the plaintiff is bad for multifariousness and causes of action?'4. the issue is not happily worded and the words 'and causes of action' appear to have crept in through a slip of the pen. however ..... where 'houses are under construction' is shown in yellow.2. in their written statement the respondents raised preliminary objections including one to the effect that the suit was bad for multifariousness and, therefore, deserved dismissal. on merits it was stated that each of the respondents had been allotted a plot in the said three khasra numbers on the 19th of september .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1974 (HC)

Smt. Janki Devi Vs. Mannilal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-13-1974

Reported in : AIR1975All91

..... was about the mis-joinder of causes of action and mis-joinder of the parties. issue no. 8 framed in this connection is as below:--'is the suit bad for multifariousness?' the learned civil judge recorded a finding that the suit was bad for mis-joinder of parties and causes of action and directed the plaintiff to remove the defects within .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1974 (HC)

Zile Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-18-1974

Reported in : AIR1975P& H115

..... , and in view of the common grounds sought to be urged by both the petitioners, it cannot be said that this petition is liable to be dismissed on account of multifariousness or mis-joinder of petitioners.' it is apparent from a perusal of the above-quoted paragraphs in the judgment of the division bench in mange ram's case that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1974 (HC)

Union of India Vs. Delton Cable Company

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-03-1974

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi142

..... not an instrument executed 'in favor of the government it is not exempt from stamp duty. thereforee, it must be impounded, and i order accordingly.(14) the award is a multifarious instrument: it disposes of three references made pursuant to three different arbitration agreements. strictly there ought to have been three separate awards. comprising or relating, as it does, to several .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 1974 (HC)

C.S. Reddy Vs. Yamuna Reddy

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-20-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Kant134; ILR1975KAR537; 1975(1)KarLJ306

..... to form an intelligent preference, that preference. the application of these tests casts an arduous duty on the court. but as has been repeatedly pointed out amongst the many and multifarious duties that a judge in chambers performs by far the most onerous i duties are those cast upon him by the guardians and wards act.16. in this case, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1974 (HC)

State of Orissa Vs. Padmalochan Panda

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-27-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Ori41

..... .air 1972 all 486 (state v. hindustan lever ltd.) is a division bench decision. in that case, their lordships held that when government was running a sub-treasury at which multifarious activities were undertaken, one of them being to receive money from private individuals for being credited to the accounts of different government departments, and the plaintiff instructed its bank to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1974 (HC)

P.L. Lakhanpal Vs. A.N. Ray and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-1974

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi66; 11(1975)DLT1; ILR1974Delhi725

..... v. c. d. govinda rao and another, (supra). it was further observed that it may be open in a quo warranto proceeding to challenge the appointment of persons employed on multifarious duties and in addition performing some judicial functions on the ground that they do not hold essentially a judicial office because they primarily perform other functions. this case is not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1974 (HC)

Mohan Koiri and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-06-1974

Reported in : AIR1974Cal253,78CWN583

..... .r.'in the administration of government in this country the functions which are given to ministers (and constitutionally properly given to ministers because they are constitutionally responsible) are functions so multifarious that no minister could ever personally attend to them......the duties imposed upon ministers and the powers given to ministers are normally exercised under the authority of the ministers by .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 1974 (HC)

In Re: United Collieries Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-10-1974

Reported in : [1975]45CompCas226(Cal)

..... single purpose or limited purposes both for institutions and men are gone. we are living in an age of multipurpose institutions and projects, men and institutions must go in for multifarious activities and ventures. whether, however, that is a desirable trend or not is another debate outside the realm of company jurisprudence.3. therefore, there will be an order in terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 1974 (HC)

H.K. Agnihotri Vs. Delhi High Court and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-1974

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi450

..... made under the relevant regulation and that no court would interfere with that discretion if it was bonafide exercised. it was observed that the functions entrusted to ministers being so multifarious that no minister could ever personally attend to them and that duties imposed upon ministers and the powers given to them were normally exercised under the authority of the ministers .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //