Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.001 seconds)

Dec 20 1979 (HC)

Shukar Hanan Mutawali and ors. Vs. Malkappa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-1979

Reported in : AIR1980Bom213; 1980MhLJ725

..... suit several causes of actionagainst the same defendants jointly. ithink, that submission is correct. i holdthat in view of this position the suit cannot be said to be barred by multifarious-ness.17. one more contention that was raised on behalf of the defendants was that three pieces of lands were mortgaged under three mortgages. the pieces of lands so mortgaged ..... way, i would proceed to see whether the plaintiffs' suit is barred by multifariousness. admittedly, the mortgagee in respect of thethree mortgages was the same. it is truethat the three pieces of lands were mortgaged by three different persons. however, on the facts found ..... of the defendants that one suit for three mortgages was not maintainable as the mortgagors were not common. it appears that the contention that the plaintiffs' suit was barred by multifariousness, was pot taken up in the lower appellate court. the only question canvassed before the lower appellate court was with regard to the adverse possession claimed by the defendants. any ..... the said lands. the defendants' contention that they had become the owners of the suit land by adverse possession was upheld. their further contention that the suit was barred by multifariousness was also upheld. in view of these findings, the learned trial judge held that the plaintiffs were not entitled for redemption and possession of the suit land and that therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1979 (HC)

Brij Lal and ors. Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-01-1979

Reported in : AIR1979P& H192

..... necessity and the same were not binding on him. on a preliminary objection raised, the trial court held vide order dated nov. 10, 1972, that the suit was bad for multifariousness and all the causes of action joined in the single suit could not be conveniently tried. vijay kumar was directed to amend the plaint and to continue the suit only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1979 (HC)

Promode Ranjan Banerjee Vs. Nirapada Mondal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-30-1979

Reported in : AIR1980Cal181

..... that when there is no decision on the merits, that is, when the matter is not heard and finally decided because of want of jurisdiction, default, non-joinder, mis-joinder, multifariousness, defective framing of the suit, technical mistake, failure to produce probate or succession certificate, failure to deposit the security for costs, for improper valuation, for non-payment of court-fee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1979 (HC)

Manohar Narayan Joshi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-23-1979

Reported in : (1980)ILLJ230Bom

..... noted that a number of factories were manufacturing articles of direct consumption like spark plugs, industrial gaskets, nuts and bolts, etc., and the bombay region was found to boast of multifarious varieties of factories, both of large-scale like m/s. godrej boyee manufacturing company and of small-scale like workshops having hardly 10 workmen manufacturing the same items. the committee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1979 (HC)

Mrs. Tarabai Lalji Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-07-1979

Reported in : (1980)21GLR15

..... other hand, prays for a decree in terms of the aforesaid award by which the claim for damages was dismissed by the said arbitrator.3. in order to appreciate the multifarious contentions advanced on behalf of the plaintiff in proper perspective, it would be profitable to trace the history of this dispute which has a chequered career althrough out these years .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1979 (FN)

Goldwater Vs. Carter

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-13-1979

..... rests in part on prudential concerns calling for mutual respect among the three branches of government. thus, the judicial branch should avoid "the potentiality of embarrassment [that would result] from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question." similarly, the doctrine restrains judicial action where there is an "unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made." baker v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1979 (SC)

S.P. Bhatnagar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-1979

Reported in : AIR1979SC826; 1979CriLJ566; (1979)1SCC535; [1979]2SCR875

..... is admitted on all hands that being the head of the engineering department, he had to tour extensively to supervise several projects spread all over the country and to discharge multifarious duties in connection therewith. the bill, it would be noted was prepared by a-3 and was countersigned by no less a functionary than the deputy engineering manager, ramrao, who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1979 (HC)

Kuldip Rastogi and anr. Vs. Vishva Nath Khanna

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-1979

Reported in : AIR1979Delhi202

..... is particularly necessary because another application to punish the rastogis for contempt of court committed after 21st nov.. 1977 is pending. on this account, i deliberately refrain from mentioning the multifarious proceedings that have occurred after nov., 1977. however, to complete the story, and not leave it in mid-air, it is necessary to say that even though the contract with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 1979 (HC)

State of U.P. Vs. Smt. Shanti and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-1979

Reported in : AIR1979All305

..... opinion, as the instrument does not deal with distinct matters, section 5 did not apply. the duty was not chargeable under this section. the document in question was not a multifarious instrument relating to several distinct matters. therefore, as the essentials which could attract section 5 were missing in the instant case, we are unable to see how this instrument could .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 1979 (FN)

Dunaway Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-05-1979

..... all seizures that do not amount to technical arrests. [ footnote 15 ] but the protections intended by the framers could all too easily disappear in the consideration and balancing of the multifarious circumstances presented by different cases, especially when that balancing may be done in the first instance by police officers engaged in the "often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime." johnson .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //