Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jul-11-1985
Reported in : AIR1986All174
..... the right of election to the plaintiff. but the trial court negatived this with the observation that 'in a suit which is itself bad for multifariousness there is no question of giving a right of election to the plaintiff.' this has been referred to by the trial judge in the decision finally ..... till the matter came up for hearing in the course of arguments. the suit was instituted in the year 1958. preliminary issue on the point of multifariousness was decided by the trial court on 15th sept. 1969. this was followed by the dismissal of the suit directed on 7th mar. 1970. the ..... to the validity of the deposits in view of the relevant provisions of the rent control act. these are the distinct facts on which the plaintiffs' multifariousness was overruled in that case. but the factual situation in the present being as it is, the analogy may not be said to be attracted.10 ..... action as resorted to in the present caste. on account, thus, of the mis-joinder, both of parties and causes of action, the action suffers from multifarious ness.9. learned counsel for the appellants placed reliance on mst. ramdayee v. .dhanraj kochar, air 1972 cal 313. the plaintiffs' case therein was that the ..... are other reliefs claimed also, a reference to which will be made below. the defendants resisted the suit pleading, inter alia, that this was bad for multifariousness. preliminary issue on this point was decided by the trial court against the plaintiff on 15th sept, 1969. on the basis of the findings thereon the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-04-1985
Reported in : AIR1985Bom372
..... first two appellants, mainly on technical grounds. in fact, they raised quite a number of objections as regards the maintainability of the suit which, according to them, is bad for multifariousness, misjoinder of causes of action and parties and untenable under ss. 31 and 34 of the specific relief act, apart from the fact that the plaint is defective inasmuch as .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Aug-29-1985
Reported in : AIR1986All163
..... other pleas were also raised which are not material to be detailed for the disposal of this appeal.18. learned trial court found that the suit was not bad for multifariousness; the suit was not barred by estoppel; defendants 1 to 8 were not bona fide purchasers for value; impugned documents were not validly executed and they were liable to be .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-03-1985
Reported in : AIR1986P& H89
..... . written statement to the amended plaint was also filed on 3rd dec. 1963. later on, the trial court framed two preliminary issues as to whether the suit was bad for multifariousness and whether the suit had not been properly valued for court fee and jurisdiction. the trial court vide its order dt 23rd jan. 1964, came to the conclusion that the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-06-1985
Reported in : AIR1985SC985; (1985)87BOMLR344; [1986(52)FLR19]; 1985LabIC1008; (1985)IILLJ401SC; 1985(1)SCALE927; (1985)3SCC371; Supp1SCR282; 1986(1)LC386(SC)
..... )iillj429sc , this court examined whether a development officer employed by the life insurance corporation is a workman within the meaning of the expression in the act. after referring to the multifarious duties assigned to a development officer, this court concluded that the principal duty of the appellant in that case appeared to be to organise and develop the business of the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-08-1985
Reported in : 1985(2)BomCR136
..... master having his office at daman). the learned counsel for respondent no. 4 contends that sarvajanik vidyalaya is a school run by mahatma gandhi memorial education society, daman, which has multifarious activities out of which the management of the school is one of its activities. he meant to say that the vidyalaya is only joined and the institution which runs this ..... as a party in this petition and the party joined is the sarvajanik vidyalaya, daman, which is run and managed by the mahatma gandhi memorial education society. this society has multifarious activities and the management of the said vidyalaya is only one of its activities. the sarvajanik vidyalays being not a legal entity cannot sue or be sued and hence the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Nov-21-1985
Reported in : (1986)(6)LC248Tri(Delhi)
..... substance should be known to be employed either as extender, suspending agent, filler or diluent. temple c. patton's "pigment handbook" in the chapter on synthetic silica (precipitated) describes the multifarious uses of the substance. among the uses are filler and extender. "the handbook of fillers & reinforcements for plastics" by henry s. katz & john v.milewski, also describes precipitated silica as .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-20-1985
..... at the essence of copyright. the copyright laws serve as the "engine of free expression," ante at 471 u. s. 558 , only when the statutory monopoly does not choke off multifarious indirect uses and consequent broad dissemination of information and ideas. to ensure the progress of arts and sciences and the integrity page 471 u. s. 590 of first amendment values .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-16-1985
Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR355; (1986)88BOMLR100; 1986MhLJ110
..... was suggested at some stage that if individual grievances can be raised and agitated even before the building is completed or the possession is given, it may make room for multifarious litigation resulting in the delay in the construction and completion of the project for the benefit of all. if, for example, it is interpreted that any alteration made in structure .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-25-1985
Reported in : 62CompCas717(MP); 1985MPLJ160
..... ,00,000 divided into 2,000 equity shares of rs. 100 each. ' but in the same year, the capital was raised to rs. 5,00,000. 5. the company has multifarious objects, such as : (a) to manufacture, import, export, buy, sell or otherwise deal in pesticides, insecticides, medicinal and toilet goods, etc. ; (b) to carry on all or any of the .....Tag this Judgment!