Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 27 results (0.001 seconds)

Jul 25 1991 (HC)

John Solomon of Bombay India and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gre ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-1991

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR711

..... dismissal of the suit. the next alternative is for a court to work out such relief as can be granted in a suit suffering form multifariousness. the first course is not open having regard to the long interval that has gone since the institution of the suit. if necessary, it ..... plaintiffs' contention that there is no misjoinder of causes or parties. be the substance in the stands whatever it be, multifariousness is not fatal in the sense of non-suiting the plaintiffs. there is first the right of the suitor to be called upon to elect ..... that there is no merit in the defence of multifariousness. three slightly disparate causes have been lumped together albeit as alternatives. there is of course a linkage between the alternatives to lend plausibility to the ..... earliest possible opportunity', defendants 1, 3, 4/16 and 28 filed their written statements as late as 1990 i.e. last year. defendants pleadings multifariousness could have taken out motions raising this plea. by their inaction they must be deemed to have waived the contention. this is not to say ..... with my findings recorded against each of them:--- issues findings1. is plaintiffs' claim as laid maintainable in law? 'yes'2. is the suit bad for multifariousness? 'no'3. do plaintiffs establish the validity of thestatutory notices served upon the stategovernment and the municipal corporation? 'yes'4. do plaintiffs establish a binding .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 1991 (HC)

New Bank of India Vs. Roshan Engineering Industries and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-1991

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas670(Delhi)

..... and 4 in favor of defendants nos. 3 and 4 and issue no. 6 against defendants nos. 3 and 4. 16. issue no. 2 : the suit is not bad for multifariousness of causes of action anf parties because defendants nos. 5 and 6 who too become partners of defendant no. 1 have admittedly taken over all the liabilities of the firm ..... the whole amount claimed in the suit. 9. following issues were framed: 1. whether courts at delhi have jurisdiction to try this case? 2. whether the suit is bad for multifariousness of causes of action and parties? 3. whether the suit is within limitation as against defendants nos. 3 and 4 in view of the dissolution of the firm as on ..... court has no territorial jurisdiction to try the suit. they also pleaded that the suit is bad for multifariousness of causes of action and parties and the suit is bad for multifariousness of causes of action and parties and the suit is bad for multifariousness of causes of action and parties and the suit is hopelessly barred by limitation against defendants nos. 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1991 (HC)

Syed Abdul Jabbar Vs. Board of Wakfs

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-1991

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1628

..... of the allegations and contentions are not quite necessary. the trial court framed as many as eight issues and among them was the issue whether the suit is bad for multifariousness on which it gave a finding in the affirmative. on issue no. 1 however it gave a finding in favour of the plaintiffs that they are the chief muzawars. it ..... section 80 c.p.c. and one of the requirements of the notice is the relief which the plaintiff claims. the trial court found that the suit is bad for multifariousness and we do not propose to express any opinion with regard to this part of observation of the trial court as we are now disposing of the appeal only on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1991 (HC)

Municipal Committee Through Its' President Vs. Ram Kumar and Ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-11-1991

Reported in : (1992)102PLR51

..... the present suit opd5. whether the civil courts have no- jurisdiction to entertain the present suit opd6. whether the suit is within time opd7. whether the suit is bad for multifariousness opd8. whether the plan of the property is necessary to be filed if so, its effect opd9. whether the property in dispute is a public street opd10. whether the plaintiffs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1991 (HC)

Syed Abdul Jabbar and Others Vs. the Board of Wakfs in Karnataka and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-1991

Reported in : AIR1992Kant43; 1991(2)KarLJ42

..... of the allegations and contentions are not quite necessary. the trial court framed as many as eight issues and among them was the issue whether the suit is bad for multifarious ness on which it gave a finding in the affirmative. on issue no. 1 however it gave a finding in favour of the plaintiffs that they are the chief muzawars ..... s. 80, c.p.c. and one of the requirements of the notice is the relief which the plaintiff claims. the trial court found that the suit is bad for multifariousness and we do not propose to express any opinion with regard to this part of observation of the trial court as we are now disposing of the appeal only on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1991 (HC)

N.S. Dass Bahl Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-21-1991

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT97

..... as alleged 7 4. whether the claims of plaintiff are justifiable 5. whether the suit is bid for non joinder of necessary parties 6. whether the suit is bad for multifariousness 7. whether the suit has not been properly valued fur the purposes of court fees and jurisdiction 102 8. whether the suit in the present form is not maintainable 7 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1991 (HC)

Rajendra Sethia Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-1991

Reported in : AIR1991Delhi285; 1991RLR179

..... vague and is not at all necessary for the purpose of determining the real question in controversy between the parties as originally laid in the suit. it is bad for multifariousness as well. this cannot be permitted. request to add the prayer is declined. in this view of the matter the amendments sought would appear to be rather superfluous. if, however ..... the suit by adding union of india and reserve bank of india, otherwise there is going to be misguide of causes of action and parties and the suit had for multifariousness. moreover, service of notice under section 80 of the code on the union of india is mandatory and the application, i.a. no. 5403 of 1990, does not specify any .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1991 (HC)

OmnaraIn Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-28-1991

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC641; 1991WLN(UC)292

..... year in which the vacancies occur, no such difficulty could arise. however, in practice we find that the rajasthan public service commission as well as other appointing authorities are having multifarious functions to perform. the r.p.s.c. is required to make recruitment for over 50 years apart from consultative functions in the matter of framing of service rules and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1991 (SC)

Ujjam Bai. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-1991

Reported in : AIR1962SC1621; 1963(1)SCR778

..... it be said that sales-tax authorities under the act are judicial tribunals in the sense they are courts in a welfare state the governments is called upon to discharge multifarious duties affecting every aspect of human activity. this extension of the governmental activity necessitated the entrusting of many executive authorities with power to decide rights of parties. they are really ..... in effect promises to usher in a welfare state for our country; and in such a state the legislature has necessarily to create innumerable administrative tribunals, and entrust them with multifarious functions. they will have powers to interfere with every aspect of human activity. if their existence is necessary for the progress of our country, the abuse of power by them .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1991 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Dr. B.K. Subbarao and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-12-1991

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2984

..... the offences with which he is charged and the specific requirements of law under those statues and under the code of criminal procedure have been by-passed and that the multifarious applications filed by him in the course of the last over three years were eloquent testimony of the fact that according to him the safeguards embodied in article 21 of ..... grievance, and to my mind frivolous one, that was pleaded on behalf of the prosecution was that the accused who has been raising one legal plea after the other in multifarious applications from time to time is alleged to have kept this point as a trump-card up his sleeve and come out with it for the first time almost 40 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //