Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.001 seconds)

Jan 08 1992 (HC)

Amirchand Tulsiram Gupta and ors. Vs. Vasant Dhanaji Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-08-1992

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR22; (1992)94BOMLR965

..... court and consequently the high court has no jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' claim. the trial judge did not accept the technical defences raised by defendant no. 5 about the multifariousness, failure to join the necessary parties, limitation, judicate etc. the trial judge held that the plaintiffs had failed to establish the quantum of damages suffered for a period of three ..... be done.the suit was resisted by defendant nos. 5 to 7. defendant no. 5 claimed that the suit was barred by law of limitation and was also bad for multifariousness and for failure to join the necessary parties, that is defendant no. 11 who was a co-trustee at the time of institution of the suit. defendant no. 5 also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1992 (HC)

N.P. Lotlikar Vs. C.B.i. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-11-1992

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2051

..... in which a public servant, more so if he happens to be in the position of a good police officer or an enforcement officer, will be vulnerable to attacks on multifarious grounds and it is for this precise reason that the law has provided a bar to prosecutions unless the grounds on which the public servant is to be prosecuted are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1992 (HC)

Manager, Umashankar Agarwal Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-26-1992

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR76; (1993)IIILLJ519Bom

..... much care as is possible and in the face of explanations made by counsel in the course of the arguments. we are unable to detect any good faith in the multifarious petitions and repeated contentions raised on behalf of the appellants throughout. the learned judge also had the same experience. we affirm his finding and concur in his conclusion. we, therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 1992 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Club of Mahabaleshwar

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Dec-11-1992

Reported in : (1993)44ITD520(Pune.)

..... -tax act and which has been inserted by the very same finance act 1981 with effect from 1-4-1981 to counter the tax avoidance adopted by persons by creating multifarious association of persons wherein the individual shares of the members in income of the aop remained indeterminate or unknown.while clarifying the intent and purpose of section 167a the board .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1992 (HC)

Rakesh Nemkumar Porwal Vs. Narayan Dhondu Joglekar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-1992

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR355; [1993]78CompCas822(Bom); 1993CriLJ680; 1993(1)MhLj630

..... april 1, 1989, there can be little doubt that section 138 was intended to be a provision to curb instances of dishonour. it will have to be presumed that the multifarious grounds on which a cheque would be dishonoured are commonplace and in not having made any exception for such situations, the legislative intent behind section 138 was that cases of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1992 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Vasant Shankar Mhasane and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-27-1992

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR84; 1993CriLJ1134; I(1992)DMC424

..... evil. the essence of prescribing a punishment for matrimonial cruelty in a penal code will be frustrated if in proven instances of cruelty a court were to bend to the multifarious pleas for leniency. in our view, a proper and meaningful application of the law will not permit misguided clemency. this does not mean that our indignation, howsoever righteous, precludes us .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1992 (HC)

Annamma Vs. Pattamma

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-11-1992

Reported in : II(1993)DMC559; ILR1993KAR755

..... be possible to determine as to who are those female heirs who are entitled to succeed to a separate property of a male hindu dying intestate in the event of multifarious heirs left by the deceased. an interpretation placed on a statute must be such that it does not, either unnecessarily expand the scope of the statute, or restrict its operation .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1992 (HC)

Narayan Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-07-1992

Reported in : 1993(0)MPLJ1

..... the subsequent bail applications should be placed before the same bench or judge who passed the earlier orders provided he is available. the reasons for so doing are obvious and multifarious. experience shows and it is common knowledge also that when the application of an accused/appellant is rejected by a bench or a particular judge then that accused/appellant is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1992 (SC)

M/S. Continental Construction Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Cen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-1992

Reported in : AIR1992SC803; (1992)2CompLJ50(SC); (1992)101CTR(SC)386; [1992]195ITR81(SC); JT1992(1)SC140; 1992(1)SCALE65; 1992Supp(2)SCC567; [1992]1SCR57

..... which can be brought under this provision may be varied and the consideration stipulated for allowing another to avail of the assessee's asset, knowledge or services can likewise assume multifarious forms. the word 'similar' connotes that the payment made to the assessee need not be in the nature of royalty, commission or fees only; it could be any payment of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1992 (HC)

Gorva Vibhag Co-operative Housing Societies Association and anr. Vs. S ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-05-1992

Reported in : (1992)1GLR654

..... of the properties involved in the instrument and that schedule i to the bombay stamp act, 1958 be simplified-by reducing the number of articles subject to duty reducing the multifarious varieties of rates of stamp duty and indicating the rate of duty in percentage instead of the amount of duty to be paid for different values'.14. in the affidavit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //