Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-27-1994
Reported in : (1995)2GLR1904
..... had to recover large amount from the defendant-gujarat electricity board and there are other contentions also of similar nature against the whole demand. there was no question or any multifariousness or possibility of separate suits on such count. therefore, section 18 would not be attracted in the present case. therefore, the maximum court fees payable would be rs. 15,000 ..... mentioned in the contract of sale was required to be paid. a further question which was considered was regarding separate causes of action. section 18 of the act deals with multifarious suits and provides that when the suit embraces two or more distinct subjects, the court fees to be levied would be on the basis of calculation on each separate subject .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jun-17-1994
Reported in : AIR1995Guj82; (1994)2GLR792
..... judge rejected the reference by order dated 3-10-1992.4. section 18 of the bombay court-fees act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the act) reads as under:--18. multifarious suits. 'where a suit embraces two or more distinct subjects the plaint or memorandum of appeal shall be chargeable with the aggregate amount of the fees to which the plaints ..... levied would be on the basis of calculation on each separate subject and each separate subject is to be clubbed together. in fact such a suit would be bad for multifarious ness, and the court may order separate trials or make such other order as may be expedient in the interest of justice ..... it is obvious that the subject matter of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-11-1994
Reported in : AIR1994SC1918; JT1994(2)SC215; 1994(2)SCALE37; (1994)3SCC1; 2SCR644
..... wide terms. it is, therefore, necessary to understand its true import and ambit. in the day-to-day administration of the state, its various functionaries in the discharge of their multifarious responsibilities take decisions or actions which may not, in some particular or the other, be strictly in accord with all the provisions of the constitution. should every such breach or ..... and acts which are evidently against the provisions of the constitution cannot be measured only by what happens in praesentie. a reasonable prognosis of events to come and of their multifarious effects to follow can always be made on the basis of the events occurring, and if such prognosis and led to the conclusion that in the circumstances, the governments of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Jun-14-1994
Reported in : (1994)(73)ELT58TriDel
..... ." an implement has been defined as "the apparatus, instruments, etc. employed in any trade or in executing any piece of work.4. wheel barrows are capable of being put to multifarious use for carrying out types of loads etc. and therefore, cannot be considered as agricultural implements. we find that the benefit of notification has been extended in the cases of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Decided on : Jul-25-1994
Reported in : (1994)51ITD467(Bang.)
..... or of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income must imply a conscious effort to do so on the part of the assessee and furthermore in the present day world of multifarious legal complexities, the dictum of 'ignorentia legis non excusat' cannot be stretched beyond a reasonable limit. no fault can, therefore, be found with an assessee who bona fide relies on .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-30-1994
..... white factors such as a history of discrimination have been found, see post, at 1013, where does the court turn for a deciding principle to give some meaning to these multifarious facts, which taken individually would each appear to count in favor of a finding of vote dilution? quite simply, the court turns to proportionality: "treating equal political opportunity as the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-28-1994
Reported in : [1995(70)FLR10]; (1998)IIILLJ275Bom
..... reference to decision reported in 1985 lic 1008 arkal govind rai rao v. ciba geigy of india ltd. bombay. the supreme court observed in paragraph 6 - 'where an employee has multifarious duties and a question is raised whether he is a workman or someone other than a workman the court must find out what are the primary and basic duties of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-27-1994
Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR496
..... in that part of the state of maharashtra, which was formerly a part of the hyderabad state, it has to be observed that such persons have approached this court for multifarious reliefs. persons, who were working in the ex-hyderabad state, have approached this court for fixation of their seniority; and pay. persons working in that part of this state, which .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-13-1994
Reported in : 1999(1)ALD222; 1999(1)ALT211
..... parties. section 4 deals with the levy of fees in courts and public offices. section 5 deals with the collection of proper fees on documents. section 6 deals with the multifarious suits, section 7 deals with the determination of market value as on the date of the presentation of the plaint, section 8 deals with the set-off or counterclaim and .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-27-1994
Reported in : AIR1994SC2775; JT1994(6)SC255; 1994(4)SCALE303; 1994Supp(3)SCC376; 1995(1)LC63(SC)
..... tamil nadu in 1956, the duties and the responsibilities of district collector became heavy. apart from the conventional revenue work, the collector was made responsible for the general administration on multifarious developmental activities. therefore, the government of tamil nadu by g.o. ms. no. 3033 revenue dated 19,8.1958 appointed additional collectors in those districts where the revenue work was .....Tag this Judgment!