Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 30 results (0.001 seconds)

Oct 09 1998 (HC)

Kantamani Seeta Ramachandra Rao and Others Vs. Meesana Mohana Rao and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-09-1998

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD177; 1999(1)ALT154

..... . the trial court settled the following issues for trial:1. whether the plaintiff is entitled for specific performance of the suit agreement of sale; 2. whether suit is bad for multifariousness; and 3. whether the suit is barred by time. the plaintiff got himself examined as pw1 and got marked to a7. the 1st defendant got himself examined as ..... . on a consideration of the oral and documentary evidence on record the trial court held that the suit is not barred by time, that the suit is not bad of multifariousness and that the plaintiff is entitled for specific performance of the suit agreement with respect to item no.1 only. the trial court held that the time is not the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1998 (HC)

Sarupa and ors. Vs. the Panchayati Akhara and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-29-1998

Reported in : (1998)119PLR713

..... they cannot be challenged in civil court. on the pleadings of the parties, the following preliminary issues were framed on 6.8.1968 :1. whether the suit is bad for multifariousness ?2. whether the relief sought in the plaint has not been correctly assessed for purpose of court-fee and jurisdiction ?3. whether the full particulars of the land have not ..... jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit?6. whether no valid notice under section 80 c.p.c. was served by the plaintiff ?7. whether the suit is bad for multifariousness ?8. whether the relief sought in the plaint has not been correctly assessed for purposes of court-fee and jurisdiction ?9. relief.4. on consideration of evidence brought on record .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1998 (HC)

Ms. Sophia Gulam Mohammed Bham Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-1998

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR446; 1999CriLJ2140

..... for the simple reason that the propensity and potentiality of the detenu, amongst others, would spread naturally to a scenario to vast extent and the area with several transactions with multifarious persons and that, therefore, we are, for no minute, to consider the vitiation of the impugned order of detention clamped against the detenu as contended by mr. shirish gupte, learned ..... order of detention against the present detenu. as the learned public prosecutor has rightly contended that paras 13 and 14 of the grounds of detention is the resultant factor of multifarious entries found in the recovered diary among the detenu and co detenu's inter se and that the said paragraphs are being referred to in the grounds of detention as ..... counsel appearing for the petitioner, next contended that the recovery of the diaries from one of the co-detenu at the relevant day consisting of several entries pertaining to the multifarious monetary transactions taken place amongst the detenu, inter se, various in nature, though formulating the ground nos. 13 and 14 of the grounds of detention, copies of the same have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1998 (HC)

Union of India Vs. Telecom Regulatory

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-1998

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)209; 74(1998)DLT282; 1998(46)DRJ557

..... to comply with clauses (a) (b) & (f) of section 11(1) of the trai act. 18. trai's functions under the act as pointed out by the attorney general over multifarious. these can be summed up under five heads namely, (1) advisory, (2) regulatory (3) adjudicatory, (4) semi legislative and (5) ancillary. so far as clauses (a) (b) (f) & (o) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1998 (HC)

Jiwan Kaur Vs. Jasbir Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-05-1998

Reported in : (1998)118PLR816

..... and keep on filing application one after the other for the same cause of action. to prevent abuse of the process of the court as well as to avoid unnecessary multifarious applications being filed on the same premises is the basic legislative intent of any procedural law.6. but in the present case, this would have no application inasmuch as the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1998 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Sarabhai Chemicals

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-1998

Reported in : (1998)(98)ELT369TriDel

..... drugs not elsewhere specified is there, it is necessary for a claimant of the notification 77/86 to show that this condition was satisfied. since the technical literature clearly indicates multifarious uses, the criteria of sole or predominant use was not satisfied ex facie. therefore, the fact that the item was of pharmaceutical standard does not help the cause of the ..... decided by the hon'ble supreme court.12. we have considered the above submissions. we observe that learned dr is correct to the extent of pointing out that it has multifarious uses.13. the 'mcgraw hill dictionary of scientific and technical terms, fifth edition' describes 'propylene glycol' as follows :- "a viscous, colorless liquid, miscible with water, alcohol, and many solvents; boils ..... a.c. had ignored the material placed on record by the respondents to prove that the imported goods have therapeutic value. the assistant collector further held that propylene glycol had multifarious uses and is not known in literature or trade parlance as drug intermediate and does not have major use as an intermediate in the manufacture of bulk drug. he also ..... ) the propylene glycol does not have any therapeutic value or prophylactic value. thus it does not merit consideration as drug. (ii) the condensed chemical dictionary shows that these items have multifarious used and these are not known in literature or trade parlance as drug intermediate and it does not have major use as an intermediate in the manufacture of any drug .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1998 (HC)

Lakha Singh Vs. Gurdarshan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-1998

Reported in : (1998)118PLR845

..... circumstances from the date of the passing of the order dated 5.2.1996. it was for the applicant to take recourse to appropriate proceedings rather than to enter into multifarious litigation on all possible fronts. the applicant himself has elected to file a regular suit which is pending in the same court. the request for consolidation has already been declined ..... not been assailed and has become final and binding upon the parties.4. from the rival contentions raised on either side it is clear that parties had been entering into multifarious litigation basically about the same subject matter. the agreement to sell does not create any interest in the property and it is also equally correct that the presence of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1998 (TRI)

K.R.S. Mani and ors. Vs. Anugraha Jewellers Limited and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Sep-23-1998

Reported in : (2000)100CompCas665

..... or they should withdraw the present petition before the company law board and continue with the earlier proceedings.anyway, he submitted that the petitioners cannot be allowed to proceed with multifarious legal proceedings on the same allegations.4. ramani, advocate for the petitioners argued that the criminal complaint filed by the petitioners was under section 406 of the indian penal code .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1998 (HC)

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-1998

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

..... ' and continued to render the service in that post till his services were terminated. as an assistant, he was designated as a group leader. question was where an employee has multifarious duties and if a dispute arises as to whether he is workmen or not, the court must find out what are the primary and basic duties of the person concerned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1998 (HC)

Gurdev Singh and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-06-1998

Reported in : AIR1998P& H106; (1998)118PLR537

..... the appellate court or by the same court which passed the decree, in accordance with law.11. the legislative intent and meaningful rule of interpretation must necessarily avoid unnecessary and multifarious litigation. the decree which finally determines the controversy between the parties must attain its finality in the real sense of the term and would not be open to alteration in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //