Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 25 results (0.001 seconds)

Feb 03 2000 (HC)

Bhushan Steel and Strips Ltd. Vs. Prem H. Lalwani and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-03-2000

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)490; 84(2000)DLT565; 2000(53)DRJ483

..... received by them. in their written statement preliminary objection has also been taken challenging the territorial jurisdiction of this court. it has been submitted that the suit is bad for multifariousness, inasmuch as there are three distinct agreement to sell and three different suits ought to have been filed. it is further disputed that the orders prayed for in this application ..... also argued before me. 2. as indicated above three questions arise for determination at this stage, namely: (i) whether the suit is liable to be rejected on the ground of multifariousness; (ii) whether this court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit ; and (iii) whether the reliefs claimed for in the application ought to be granted. 3. mention has already ..... land sought to be purchased by the plaintiff. in these circumstances, i am unable to accept the arguments of the defendants, at this stage, that the suit is bad for multifariousness. it is quite likely that in the event of three separate suits having being filed, an objection that a single suit should alone have been preferred, could well have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2000 (HC)

K. Chinna Biddamma Vs. J. Krishnama Naidu and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-22-2000

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD304; 2001(1)ALT342

..... at a belated stage but now, it is well settled principles of law that the applications for amendment of plaint are considered liberally having regard to the fact that thereby multifariousness of the proceedings would be avoided. the declaration of title sought for by the plaintiff, even according to the learned court below, could be decided in the suit for permanent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2000 (HC)

Nandram and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2000

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1164; 87(2000)DLT234; 2000(56)DRJ662

..... dismissed by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff's appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or misguide of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2000 (HC)

Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)342; 86(2000)DLT246

..... various disparate and unconnected averments have been made against several statutory authorities and a number of private individuals. he submitted that the petition ex-facie suffers from the defect of multifariousness.17. mr. desai next submitted that it was settled law that in a case where a charge sheet was filed in the competent court, it was that court alone which ..... anadi mukha satguru v. v.r. rudani : (1989)iillj324sc .15. mr. desai next submitted that the present petition suffered from the vice of misguide of parties, causes of action and multifariousness. he relied upon a chart (which has been set out at page 293 of the counter affidavit of respondent no. 12) and submitted that this unequivocally showed that there was .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2000 (HC)

Gopi Nath Vs. Ist Addl. District Judge, Ghazipur and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-03-2000

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2526

..... .7. now if the revisionist is added in this case in that event issue would be completely different and that too between the plaintiffs inter se. therefore, it would introduce multifariousness in the suit. it would introduce altogether a distinct independent and different cause of action between the plaintiffs inter se. such a situation is not permissible.8. then again jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2000 (HC)

Brothers Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corporati ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-21-2000

Reported in : AIR2001Raj266; 2001(1)WLC13

..... corporations act. 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1951'). annexure-19 relates to petitioner no. 1 whereas annexure-20 relates to petitioner no. 2, in order to avoid multifariousness. learned counsel for the petitioners presses the writ petition only for petitioner no. 1 and withdraw the petition of petitioner no. 2 with liberty to file a fresh one,2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2000 (HC)

Forum for Fairness in Education and ors. Vs. Shri Vilasrao Deshmukh an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-04-2000

Reported in : AIR2001Bom136; (2001)2BOMLR138

..... to this court for a direction to the union of india to produce the tax assessment record of the appointee. that petition was, inter alia, rejected on the ground of multifariousness.27. there appears to us little doubt that the sheriff does have several duties under the letters patent of this court and the original side rules. we, however, feel that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2000 (HC)

Radha Saran Dubey and Another Vs. Ram Niwas and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-28-2000

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2282

..... case. inasmuch as in the present case it is altogether a new cause of action that is being sought to be introduced changing the whole complexion of the suit introducing multifariousness and misjoinder of cause of action and that too a cause of action that had purported to have arisen after filing of the suit, which normally cannot be incorporated in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2000 (HC)

Administrator General, U.P. Allahabad Vs. Narendra Pal Singh (Decd.) T ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2662

..... on the premise that the grant of letters of administration to the administrator general is 'judgment tn rem'. the sale of this property at this stage is likely to produce multifariousness and create complications.11. in the circumstances, the proper course would be to let the administrator general continue to manage the disputed property as per the letters of administration granted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2000 (FN)

United States Vs. Mead Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-08-2000

..... the administering agency, and (2) ensures that no prior decision can possibly be cited which contradicts that requirement, by simply announcing that all prior decisions according chevron deference exemplify the multifarious ways in which that congressional intent can be manifested: "[a]s significant as notice-and-comment is in pointing to chevron authority, the want of that procedure here does not ..... matters intentionally left by congress to be worked out at the agency level. although we all accept the position that the judiciary should defer to at least some of this multifarious administrative action, we have to decide how to take account of the great range of its variety. if the primary objective is to simplify the judicial process of giving or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //