Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 48 results (0.002 seconds)

Mar 05 2008 (HC)

Som Parkash Vs. Karam Dass Through His L.Rs. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-05-2008

Reported in : (2008)151PLR700

..... relief on the basis of subsequent agreement ex.d1 dated 2.8.1962. when respondents amended the suit and claimed alternative relief, their suit was dismissed for multifariousness. ex.p1 dated 1.12.1957 if executed would have vested larger chunk of land in favour of the respondents. ex.d1 was executed to restrict claim ..... fresh agreement ex.d1 dated 2.8.1962 was executed to bind the parties and accordingly the suit was amended and subsequently after same was dismissed for multifariousness it is too late in the day to bar the respondents from seeking relief which will flow to them out of subsequent agreement ex.d1 dated 2 ..... lall seal : [1952]1scr179 .having laid much stress upon ganesh shets case (supra), mrs. gandhi urged that once despite dismissal of the suit being bad for multifariousness an option having been given to the respondents to rely either upon agreement ex.p1 dated 1.12.1957 or agreement ex.d1 dated 2.8.1962, learned single ..... amended plaint was filed on 3.12.1963.8. lateron, the trial court framed two preliminary issues as to whether the suit was bad for multifariousness and whether the suit was not properly valued for court fee. the trial court came to the conclusion on 23.1.1964 that the suit was bad ..... for multifarious-ness and accordingly gave the respondents an option to remove the defects. on 28.1.1964 amended suit was filed. it was prayed in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2008 (HC)

Avala Raja Reddy Vs. Gunti Radha Krishnaiah Chetty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-2008

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT70

..... pat. 613, the parties having gone to trial on an issue of title on the merits; defendants were not allowed to succeed in appeal on the contention that there was multifariousness. it is settled law that where paramount title has been adjudicated on, in a mortgage or redemption suit the defeated party will not be allowed to raise the contention that ..... be a joinder of causes of action of this description, and in sarala sundari v. sarada prasad (1904) 12 c.l.j. 602 the ground of decision was thai such multifariousness was fatal to the suit.but even under the old code it was recognized that this general rule was subject to exceptions, and in the code of 1908 the rule ..... inconvenience and expense caused to the defendants. the written statement of the present appellants (as is common in india) contained a plea that the suit was bad for misjoinder or multifariousness, but their lordships have not been satisfied, that at any time before the commencement of the trial any appropriate and serious application was made to the court upon the face .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2008 (HC)

Hariender Kaur Vs. Sharan Gurdev Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-12-2008

Reported in : (2008)2PLR478

..... dismissed by the trial. court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff s appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or misjoinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2008 (HC)

Mohd. Zakaria (D) by L.Rs. Vs. Smt. Ishrat Begum (D) by L.Rs.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2008

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1579

..... dismissed by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiffs appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or mis-joinder of parties or multifariousness, or on the ground that the suit was badly framed or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2008 (HC)

Rajmani Sharma and ors. Vs. Khitish Debnath

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-07-2008

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN471

..... separate suits, the joinder of all the defendants in the suit is permissible under order 1 rule 3 of the c.p.c. the suit is, therefore, not bad for multifariousness or mis-joinder of causes of action.14. in view of the aforesaid discussion, i am of the considered view that there is no ground to interfere with the judgment ..... up or on the evidence or on the decree awarded to the plaintiff.13. in view of the ratio of the aforesaid decisions, it is clear that the question of multifariousness is to be decided on the basis of the averments made in the plaint. as per the averments made in the amended plaint, it appears that the defendants allegedly had ..... the pleadings or rather, the plaint, for our present purpose, and, inview of the allegation of conspiracy, made therein, the present suit should be held maintainable and not bad for multifariousness.it has been further held by the hon'ble court in the said decision as follows:it is true that, in the plaint, there are also other claims, namely, of ..... out by the learned court. there is, therefore, no ground to interfere with the findings of the learned courts below on this point.11. secondly, as regards the question of multifariousness or mis-joinder of parties and causes of action in the suit, the learned counsel for the respondent referred to the provisions of order 1 rule 3 of the c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2008 (HC)

Sri Tapan Prakash Bose Vs. Sri Arun Kumar Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-26-2008

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT422(HC)

..... of the parties.mr. banerjee, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner cited the following decisions to support his contention that the suit is not main tenable for misjoinder of multifarious causes of action against different set of defendants:1. balasundara mudaliar v. muthuvenkatachala mudaliar and ors. : air1954mad799 2. bankim chandra paira and anr. v. anand bazar patrika and anr. : air1950cal129 ..... of action in one suit may embarrass and/or delay the trial of the suit and further when the court finds inconvenience to try such a suit because of such multifariousness. subject matter of consideration in both the suits are different. there is no common issue between the parties excepting the issue relating to the legality of the deed of settlement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2008 (HC)

Vinodbhai Balashanker Raval Vs. Deputy Collector, Stamp Duty Valuation ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-2008

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2754

..... as under:3. the secretary, revenue department, was called so that repetition of error on the part of deputy collector/collector, stamp duty valuation organization can be avoided, and ultimately, multifariousness of the petitions can be avoided. thoroughly, non-speaking orders have been passed. the basis on which the notice has been issued has never been supplied to the petitioners and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2008 (HC)

Ananta Naskar Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-24-2008

..... dismissed by the trial court for want of jurisdiction, or for default of plaintiff's appearance, or on the ground of non-joinder of parties or misjoinder of parties or multifariousness, on the ground that the suit was badly framed, or on the ground of a technical mistake, or for failure on the part of the plaintiff to produce probate or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2008 (HC)

N.G. Sheth Vs. C.B.i. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-11-2008

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT789

..... magistrate. it is palpably clear, but the distinction must be drawn, that the present post of district magistrate does not correspond in powers and functions to the extremely important and multifariously powerful post of district magistrate prior to october, 1969. so far as presidency magistrates are concerned, we have already mentioned that they now correspond to mms, unless the context otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2008 (HC)

Barla Rami Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2008

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD752; 2008(3)ALT336

..... it from time to time by the government for the efficient administration of the act. these provisions thus clearly show that the government is assigned pivotal role and entrusted with multifarious functions under the act to achieve the purpose and objects of the act. by interpreting the words 'or otherwise' by giving their natural and etymological meaning, it does not lead .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //