Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multifariousness Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.002 seconds)

Jul 02 2009 (HC)

Lakhbir Singh Vs. Darshan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-02-2009

Reported in : (2009)155PLR765

..... led on issue no. 6, still it was left undecided.20. issue no. 7 was decided in favour of the plaintiff by holding that the suit was not bad for multifariousness. issue no. 8 was decided in favour of the plaintiff by holding that there was no defect in the frame of the suit. the suit was held to be within ..... , its effect? opd-56. whether defendants no. 11 an 12 are bona fide purchasers for consideration and without notice? opd-11 and 12.7. whether the suit is bad for multifariousness? opd8. whether the suit is maintainable in the present form? opp9. whether the suit is within limitation? opp10. whether the plaintiff has locus standi to file the present suit? opp11 ..... , 7 to 9 and 13 by filing separate written statements. however, grounds of challenge were similar.8. the case set up in defence was that the suit was bad for multifariousness and that the suit was not maintainable in the present form. locus standi of the plaintiff to file the suit was also challenged. plea that the suit was not properly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2009 (HC)

Estate of Meera Malhotra Vs. Vijay Dixit and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-30-2009

Reported in : 165(2009)DLT84

..... first defendant, and partition of 1/4th share of ms. meera malhotra.6. the fifth defendant, by his application ia no. 3686/2009, points out that the suit suffers from multifariousness, since ms. indu bala and other heirs of inderjit lal malhotra, on the basis of their being beneficiaries of a will (of ms. malhotra) have filed several other proceedings. it ..... , rule 2, cpc. the present suit therefore, is clearly barred in law.14. in view of the above discussion, it is held that the present suit is not maintainable, for multifariousness, not seeking 110eave of court, before instituting it, and excluding the present claim in the previous suit, as also on the ground that it is time barred. it is therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2009 (HC)

Shappa Alias Ishwarappa Vs. Kalakappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-12-2009

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ301

..... judicata?8. whether the defendant proves that the court fee paid is insufficient?9. whether the defendant proves that the suit is hit by misjoinder of causes of action and multifariousness?10. whether the suit is not maintainable without bringing the suit for cancellation of gift deed dated 25-10-1957 and the judgment and decree in o.s. no. 96 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2009 (HC)

Nabarun Chitramandir Vs. Learned Certificate Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-16-2009

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ444Cal

..... the petitioner and its two partners to pay the amounts mentioned in the notices, the petitioner took out a single writ petition.9. i do not think the question of multifariousness should be examined at this final stage, especially when the respondents ever raised any objection. interim order initially made was not extended, since no step was taken for the purpose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 2009 (HC)

iqbal Ahmed Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal Secretary to Gover ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-26-2009

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT522

..... the impugned order of the tribunal is warranted in the present case, as allowing the said interim order to remain would result in incalculable repercussions and public mischief, apart from multifarious litigations. facts, circumstances and reasons in support of our order are mentioned in the following paragraphs.7. the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the 3rd respondent's objection ..... suspended and a different criteria is directed to be adopted for preparing a fresh seniority list, and based on that if further promotions are ordered, it will certainly lead to multifarious litigations.19. the impugned order of the tribunal, is therefore, not sustainable and is liable to be set aside and accordingly modified by directing that any promotions in pursuance of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2009 (HC)

In Re: Hindalco Industries Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-22-2009

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas446(Bom); [2009]94SCL1(Bom)

..... think is not really perhaps best expressed as the 'motive' for the reduction, since the reduction is the result of an extraordinary resolution which will have been voted for by multifarious persons, many of whom will have different private motives, all leading them to act the same way. but, if it can be seen that the reduction is one which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2009 (FN)

Smith (Appellant) Vs. Northamptonshire County Council (Respondents)

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : May-20-2009

..... for use or used . . . at work in regulation 3(2) is such a provision. nonetheless, particularly in relation to legislation such as the 1998 regulations, which can apply in such multifarious circumstances, any judicial observations can normally be no more than helpful guidance, which at best can be of value in the great majority of cases. 79. it is not unknown ..... an employer in a very wide, but not infinitely wide, range of factual circumstances, many of which it is impossible to envisage in abstract, and which are any way so multifarious that it is impossible to spell out even all those that can be foreseen. having said all that, there is undoubtedly a difference between the two approaches, as the difference .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2009 (HC)

Navelcar Hotels, Represented in This Act by Its Partner Mr. Harish Vin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-2009

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR270

..... over.(k) it is not, prima facie proved that plaintiffs' pecuniary turn over is solely of said i.e. hotel activity in the light of plaintiffs' admission that it has multifarious activities and business.25. present is a case of clash between a registered trade mark user and unregistered contender, and the defendants have proved from documentary evidence their invention, use .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2009 (HC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dr. Yogiraj Sharma

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-2009

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT250

..... university, bhopal in the year 2004. thereafter he prosecuted his studies in the university of western sydney, australia and completed this course in the year 2006. thereafter he started his multifarious business activities at bhopal and acquired considerable assets and properties because of business activities undertaken by him. the respondent's son was living separately in his own house bearing no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2009 (HC)

Dr. Kirti Saxena (Smt.) Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-2009

Reported in : 2010(1)MPHT349

..... .p. agricultural university and anr. : air 1997 sc 3433, in paragraphs 10 and 20 has held as under:from the aforesaid affidavit, it is clear that a physical director has multifarious duties. he not only arranges games and sports for the students every evening and looks after the procurement of sports material and the maintenance of the grounds but also arranges .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //