Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: allahabad Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 23 results (0.007 seconds)

May 21 1964 (HC)

Manna Lal Vs. Mst. Chhotka Bibi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-21-1964

Reported in : AIR1964All552

..... and be heard and disposed of as heretobefore, as if this act had not been brought into force.' thus under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act, letters patent appeals (now called special appeals) to a division bench against the decision of a learned single judge in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction were abolished. (it is not disputed that ..... court fee cannot be decided forthwith. let it be taken as presented today.' while his document was pending before the joint registrar, the u. p. high court (abolition of letters patent appeals) act (u. p. act no. xiv of 1962) (hereinafter referred to as the act) was enforced from the 13th of november. 1962. section 3 of the act provides as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1964 (HC)

Reeta Rani Singh Vs. Raghuraj Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-25-1964

Reported in : AIR1965All380

..... matter our answer to the question is in the affirmative that this court has jurisdiction in the exercise of powers under clause 12 of the letters patent (allahabad) to appoint guardian of a minor and pass orders with regard to the custody of such minor. let the papers be returned to the ..... over such persons alone over which it is being exercised by the calcutta high court. it has been expressly provided in clause 12 of the letters patent of this court that this power is to be exercised with respect to (all) 'persons and estates of infants, idiots, and lunatics within the north ..... lunatics.' their lordships of the privy council, therefore, treated this matter of infants as a special jurisdiction conferred upon the high court by the letters patent apart from its ordinary original civil jurisdiction and there is no reason why the same should not apply to this court and the power given in clause ..... part of ordinary original civil jurisdiction only.in hamid hasan v. banwarl lal roy air 1947 p c 90, their lordships while dealing with the letters patent of the calcutta high court, observed as follows:-- 'clause 12 defines the extent of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction. later clauses confer upon the high ..... 2. we are, after hearing learned counsel at some length, unable to agree with him for the following reasons:-- 3. clause 12 of the letters patent of this court falls under the sub-head 'civil jurisdiction' and it is plain that this power had been given to this court in the exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1964 (HC)

S. B. Singar Singh and Sons Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahab ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-21-1964

Reported in : [1965]58ITR626(All)

..... 9th june, 1956, rejected the application. it is this order which the petitioner, by means of this writ petition filed on 4th november, 1961, seeks to challenge as being one patently erroneous in law, or one where the tribunal failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it.two questions, therefore, fall to be considere : one, whether there was, in fact, any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 01 1964 (HC)

Durga Prasad and Another Vs. Income-tax Officer, A-ward, Muzaffarnagar ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-01-1964

Reported in : [1965]57ITR583(All)

..... the law correctly until such time it is not overruled by a larger bench or the supreme court then there is no escape from the conclusion that there was a patent error of law and the issue of notice by the income-tax officer under section 34(1)(a) in the teeth of that decision had inevitably caused failure of justice ..... to issue the impugned notice beyond the period of limitation of eight years.learned counsel for the opposite party contended that it could not be said that there was a patent error of law or that there was any failure of justice by the issue of the notice under section 34(1)(a) and as such this was not a fit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1964 (HC)

Kanodia Brothers Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-1964

Reported in : [1965]57ITR765(All)

..... other ground.it is well settled that a writ of prohibition can only be issued if it is a proved to the satisfaction of the court that there is a patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the authority taking the proceedings. in a doubtful or marginal case the writ cannot go. nothing has been shown to us to justify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1964 (HC)

State of U.P. Vs. Maharaj NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-01-1964

Reported in : AIR1965All443; 1965CriLJ338

..... bench (dayal and agarwala jj. dissenting) that the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 12 of the indian limitation act applied in computing the period of limitation for letters patent or special appeals, as they are now called, and the time requisite for obtaining copies of the judgment and decree appealed from is to be excluded in computing the period ..... ali khan v, abdul qavi khan, : air1956all273 . rule 7, chap. iii of the rules of court in force in 1951 provided that, in the case of appeals under the letters patent, the memorandum of appeal need not be accompanied by a copy of the judgment or decree appealed from. it was held in the case of : air1956all273 (supra) by the majority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1964 (HC)

Ram Surat Singh Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-06-1964

Reported in : AIR1965All49

..... found to be invalid on this ground. rule 6 has been found to be valid in the cases of sri chhotey lal, : air1952all913 and abida begam, : air1959all675 . in institute of patent agents v. lockwood, 1894 ac 347 and minister of health v. the king, 1931 ac 49(sic) it was held by the house of lords that a rule, i(sic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1964 (HC)

Smt. Chaboo Devi Vs. Pt. Ram Sarup and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-10-1964

Reported in : AIR1965All79

..... is not an appeal governed by the code of civil procedure as the code does not provide for special appeals at all. it is an appeal filed under the letters patent and rules of court.section 117 c. p. c. lays down that 'save as provided in this part or in part x or in rules, the provisions of this code .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1964 (HC)

Smt. Rajeshwari Misra and anr. Vs. Markandeshwar Mahadeo Trust and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-21-1964

Reported in : AIR1965All211

..... the authority of the code of civil procedure which applies to a proceeding under the succession act may be said to be an order made in the exercise of letters patent jurisdiction but cannot be said to be an order made by virtue of the powers conferred by the succession act. an order made in the exercise of a jurisdiction conferred .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1964 (HC)

Syed Ashfaq HusaIn Sajjad HussaIn Vs. Sant Ram and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-04-1964

Reported in : AIR1964All420

..... in it by law and the high court was bound to interfere under its revisional powers.the subsequent case was referred to a full bench on an appeal in letters patent against the decision of a single judge in revision, and the bench came tothe conclusion that where a small cause suit is tried by a munsif on the original side .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //