Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Page 100 of about 2,101 results (0.041 seconds)

Mar 03 2006 (HC)

Syed Saleema Bee Vs. Syed Noorjahan and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD721; 2006(2)ALT637

..... . section 20 of c.p.c., has three clauses. clauses (a) and (b) speaks of respondents or defendants whereas clause (c) speaks of cause of action. though it is not patent, on a true interpretation, it can be concluded that in a situation where section 20(c) applies, the same overrides section 20(a) and (b). in such a situation, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1964 (HC)

Public Prosecutor Vs. V. Nagabhushanam

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1965AP118; 1965CriLJ420

..... analysis. the oil was found to be adulterated. the case, therefore, falls fairly with sec. 7(i) of the act. the very definition of the word 'sale' makes this position patent. (27) now the relevant provisions of the act may be noticed. section 16 provides for the penalties for offences under the act and reads as follows: '16 (1) if any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1959 (HC)

Thadi Narayana Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP1

..... maintainability of the revision and questioned the competence of the full bench 'to discuss anv question arising out of the said criminal revision'. his contention is that neither the letters patent, nor the criminal procedure code, provides for a review nf the high court's orders, nor is there any provision under which file correctness of that order can be gone into. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1987 (HC)

South India Textiles and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989AP55

..... conditions as may be prescribed by the central government use, or continue to use, for the purpose of any trade, business, calling or profession, or in the title of any patent, or any colourable imitation thereof without the previous permission of the central government or of such officer of government as may be authorised in this behalf by the central government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1968 (HC)

Syed Jalal and ors. Vs. Tarrgopal Ram Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1970AP19

gopal rao ekbote, j. 1. the question which has to be answered in this letters patent appeal, is, where tow distinct decrees are passed in a suit and an appeal is preferred against only one of them, can it be said that it is an appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1958 (HC)

K.V. Seshavataram Vs. State of Hyderabad (Now Andhra Pradesh)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959AP251; (1959)IILLJ277AP

..... he was officiating, to his substantive post in class iii service. a learned judge of the high court had allowed a writ petition against the aforesaid order, but in letters patent appeal the judgment was reversed. in the appeal to the supreme court das, c.j., who delivered the majority judgment of the court has observed as follows at page 48 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1990 (HC)

S.S. Zaffar Vs. Labour Court, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1992)ILLJ653AP

..... zone also and his powers cannot transgress the limit of his authority assigned to him for the discharge of his duties as the manager of a particular zone. it is patently clear that the appellant herein was the zonal sales manager having control over the affairs of the establishment under him and this is enough to satisfy the requirement of section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1977 (HC)

Coramandal Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and Three ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1979CENCUS456D; 1979(4)ELT501(AP)

..... from two or more fertilisers. when the notification once again uses the word 'fertilisers' its intention to emphasise that the exemption would be available only to mixtures of fertilisers becomes patent. this meaning is further made clearer by the explanation which gives the meaning of the term 'mixed fertilisers' as 'mixtures' or 'fertilisers'. therefore, there cannot be any hesitation to understand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1978 (HC)

Hyderabad Race Club Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1979]120ITR185(AP)

..... (a) and in clause (b) of sub-section (2) that they shall not exceed 10% of the gross total income or two hundred thousand rupees, whichever is less. it is patent from the language of sub-section (4) that it cannot be read de hors or independently of sub-section (1). its very language demonstrates that sub-section (4) is only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1996 (HC)

Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1996)135CTR(AP)89; [1996]222ITR672(AP)

..... the notice under s. 59 was not upheld by the tribunal as also by the high court in reference. it was alleged that the information furnished by the department was patently erroneous. while so, a further notice was issued to the petitioner on 28th feb., 1987 calling upon the petitioner to file return pursuant to notice dt. 10th jan., 1975 under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //