Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Page 11 of about 2,101 results (0.053 seconds)

Apr 30 1997 (HC)

Yamunanagar Co-operative House Building Society, Rep. by Its President ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(4)ALT317

..... cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case, and the finality of the judgment delivered by the court will not be reconsidered except 'where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in order by judicial fallibility'. an error apparent on the face of the record exists if of two or more views canvassed on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1995 (HC)

Yarlagadda Venkakka Choudary (Dead) and anr. Vs. Daggubati Lakshminara ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT877

..... 65 of the limitation act, 1963. the period of limitation for such a suit is 12years when the possession of the defendants became adverse to the plaintiffs. patently neither rajamma nor plaintiffs were in possession of the suit lands within 12 years next before the suit. strictly speaking, it ran to commence from the year ..... a-6 the partition deed between defendant no. 1 and his sons dated 27-7-1957 which came into existence within a short time after ex.a-3 patently omitted to include suit lands for the purpose of partition although they are said to be the joint family properties. (3) the cordial relationship between the parties at ..... law by both leal and illegal methods. it may stretch for sufficient time both before and after the legislation. ex.a-3 is dated 12-4-1957. patently it has come into existence within the close proximity of such a land legislation, the learned sub judge has rightly pointed out that even the plaintiffs 1 ..... execute gift deed in respect of the lands already presented to her, so that disputes my not arise in future with his sons. such an expression is patently absent in the plaint wherein it is stated that rajamma felt that it well be better in the interest of all concerned to have a registered instrument ..... 3 if that gift is true and at any rate can never be an acknowledgement of a gift, since it was never made by any of them. patently, ex. a-3 is a unilateral document. rajamma is not a party to the document. p.w.i has admitted that neither he nor rajamma was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1999 (HC)

iqbal Begum Vs. Chote Miyan

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD217; 1999(6)ALT128

..... nor it has contained the traits and trappings of finality. in order to treat an order as a 'judgment' within the meaning of the letters patent, a controversy must have been decided affecting the valuable rights of the parties. by the order under challenge, the learned single judge has simply set aside ..... a controversy which affects valuable rights of one of the parties, it must be treated to be a judgment within the meaning of the letters patent. every interlocutory order cannot be treated as a judgment but only those orders would be judgment which decide matters of moment or affect vital and ..... now, we may refer to the interpretation given by the supreme court with regard to the word 'judgment' appearing in clause 15 of the letters patent of the high court which has been the subject-matter of judicial interpretation by the supreme court in khimji's case supra. the supreme court in ..... various clauses of order 43, rule i to a larger bench of the high court without at all disturbing, interfering with or overriding the letters patent jurisdiction. this was not the situation in the present case on hand. the learned judge has only set aside the order passed in the crp ..... which, the present appeal is filed. that is how the appellant has sought to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under clause 15 of the letters patent.3. sri lakshmareddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the procedure followed by the learned single judge in treating the application filed under order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1972 (HC)

K.Y. Sodamma and anr. Vs. K. Gunneswarudu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1973AP295

..... their lordships observed that they were not impressed by this argument, as ' in the first place decrees are passed in appeals heard under the letters patent only under the code of civil procedure. in the second place, section 114(b) does not require that orders and decrees should have been passed ..... mad 670 ) a question arose whether it is competent to the high court to review judgments in appeal preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent. one of the arguments advanced was that section 114 of the civil procedure code dealing with review cannot apply as it provides only for the review of ..... air1965all79 , where it was held that having regard to sections 117 and 122, civil procedure code. order 44 will apply to special appeal ( equivalent to a letters patent appeal ) against a judgment of the high court in a first appeal, unless there is anything in the rules contained in the schedule to the code ..... subordinate courts. hence it was necessary to provide specifically that the provisions of that order will apply to appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent which are against the judgments of the high court and not of subordinate courts. order 44 however, is of a general nature and applies ..... unable to agree with this contention. the expression ' appeal ' used in this order is comprehensive enough and includes all appeals, including a letters patent appeal. the code of civil procedure is an act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedure of the courts of civil judicature. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1974 (HC)

P. Bathinaiah Vs. P. Visweswara Pillai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1975AP11

..... it is a fit case for appeal.9. in the absence of such declaration, it unambiguously emerges from the language of clause 15 of the letters patent that no letters patent appeal against the order of chinnappa reddi, j. in c. m.a. no. 562 of 1972 is maintainable. the reference is answered accordingly. however ..... first part of clause 15. ramesam. j. observed at page 225 = (at p. 572 of air) that 'civil procedure code does not control the section of the letters patent.' the same view was expressed by ananta krishna aiyar, j. also at page 235 = (at p. 576 of air). but this does not help the contention of ..... the high court, unless the judge who has passed the judgment declares that the case is a fit one for appeal. the reason for this is patent. when a single judge of this court sits in appeal over a judgment or order passed by the appellate court in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction ..... remitted the appeal back to that court for its disposal on merits. the plaintiff seeks to impugn this order of chinnappa reddy, j., by filing this letters patent appeal.3. the office took an objection that the c.m.a. disposed of by chinnappa reddy, j. is in the nature of a second appeal ..... brought by the appellants to the trial court for disposal on merits.2. what happened in this case is; the plaintiff. who seeks to bring this letters patent appeal, filed o. s. no. 149 of 1966 in the district munsifs court, srikalahasthi for permanent injunction in respect of certain properties. that claim was founded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 1983 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Addl. Labour Court ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ128AP

..... to discharge his normal duties and that constituted reasonable cause for not imposing the penalty or removal on him. the labour court, in the circumstance of the case, committed a patent error in holding that the penalty of removal was shockingly disproportionate or that it was illegal, as the 2nd respondent failed to perform the primary and basic duty cast on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1976 (HC)

N.M. Mehta Vs. Coromandal Fertilizers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ151AP

..... expressions 'no employer shall without a reasonable cause ...terminate the service of an employee.,' and the words 'without giving such employee...'. the expression 'such employee' used in the later limb patently refers to the employee whose services have been terminated. therefore, it appears to us that in the first part of the sub-section, the legislature has imposed an embargo on ..... reasons. learned government pleader gave his support to the construction laid by the employee-appellant. if sub-section (1) is read by itself, it may be capable of either construction. patently the wording of the sub-section is not very happy. we hope and trust that the legislature would, at the earliest point of time, amend the sub-section in such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2005 (HC)

Mudiki Bhimesh Nanda Vs. Tirupathi Urban Development Authority and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD792; 2005(5)ALT41

..... could be characterized as vitiated by 'error apparent'. a review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for patent error. (see thungabhadra industries v. govt. of a.p., : [1964]5scr174 )13. in meera bhanja v. nirmala kumari chaudhary, : air1995sc455 , the supreme court held that an error apparent on the ..... held that a review proceeding cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case and the finality of the judgment will be reconsidered only where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept into by judicial fallibility. a judgment based on factual foundation is not open to review merely because some alternative situations were not presented .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2008 (HC)

Mekala Thimmaraju and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(5)ALD726; 2008(6)ALT791

..... interest, the collector has no option except to order for its disposal. while the reason, namely, the speedy and natural decay of the commodity given by the district collectors is patent, a close analysis of the impugned orders by which they directed distribution of the seized commodities through public distribution system instead of selling the same in the public auction clearly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 1962 (HC)

Chand Sultana Alias Indra Bai Vs. Khurshid Begum and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1963AP365

..... on an interlocutory injunction to attempt finally to decide the question whether the act complained of is an infringement or (if the question of the validity of the patent is raised) whether the patent is a valid one or not, yet in my opinion it ought to be satisfied that on one or both of those two points, the plaintiff in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //