Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Page 5 of about 2,101 results (0.089 seconds)

Oct 25 2013 (TRI)

B. Venkateswara Reddy and Another Vs. M/S Kamineni Hospitals Rep. by I ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... supportive measures were continued and the treatment was modified accordingly to the need and on the 5th post operative day, inspite of intensive care treatment and other supportive measures, the patents condition deteriorated despite increasing doses of ionotropic support and at about 7.30 pm. the patient developed cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was attempted but unfortunately the patient could not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2014 (HC)

M/S. Priyadarshini Spinning Mills Ltd.,h Vs. Commissioner of Income-ta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the income tax act, 1961, (for short the act) as, pool of tangible assets such as buildings, machinery, plant or furniture on the one hand and intangible assets such as patents, copyrights, trade-marks, licences, franchises etc., on the other hand. one condition for grouping such items together, is that the rate of depreciation must be same for the items to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2001 (HC)

H. Kondal Reddy Vs. Central Bank of India, Hyderabad and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD280; 2002(1)ALT135; [2002(93)FLR245]

..... after referring to various authorities summarised the law as under:the position which emerges from the above discussion is that under clause 15 of the letters patent of the chartered high courts, from the judgment (within the meaning of that term as used in that clause) of a single judge of ..... provided, 39. clause 15 providing of appeals from a learned single judge to a division court is ipsisima verba with the similar provision in letters patent of calcutta and letters patent of madras high courts. in national sewing thread company limited v. james chadwick and bros. limited, : [1953]4scr1028 and south asia industries ..... court of judicature, madras, is in relation to its exercise of jurisdiction is governed and regulated by the same court procedures and practice as well as its letters patent. (see m. subbarayudu v. state of a.p., : air1955ap87 (fb), and t. veeraiah v. t. nagalah, : air1959ap547 (fb).38. the jurisdiction ..... is not always a power to review its own order. there could be cases where without exercising power of review the order may be recalled.letters patent and jurisdiction under article 22637. the british parliament by indian high courts act, 1861 (24 and 25 vict, c104) enacted a legislation for ..... effective administration of justice.(2) a writ appeal is the continuation of the writ petition. merely because it is an appeal under the letters patent of the court, it does not change its character from being a writ proceeding to an ordinary civil proceeding.(3) the hon'ble the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1980 (HC)

M. Gopaiah Vs. Sri Malleswara Swami Labour Contract Co-operative Socie ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1981AP182

..... the proceedings under article 226 of the constitution. none of the rules framed under article 225 of the constitution override clause 15 of the letters patent nor any of these rules confer a specific right of appeal against the order such as the one against which the present appeal is filed ..... nothing more than a step towards obtaining a final adjudication in the suit is not, in my opinion, a judgment within the meaning of the letters patent.' speaking generally i think the word 'judgment' means any 'final order, decree or judgment' within the meaning of these words as used in ..... should include all orders in civil proceedings. further, i am not prepared to infer, from the fact that in sections 39 and 40 of the letters patent a distinction is drawn between final judgment, decrees or orders, and interlocutory judgments, decrees or orders, that the word 'judgment' in section 15 is to ..... tried in its extraordinary original civil jurisdiction and had to determine whether it is a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent for the purpose of appeal. after considering the meaning of the word 'judgment', while stating that 'it is not our purpose in the present ..... such an order. appeals against judgments rendered in writ petitions by a single judge of this court are filed and entertained under clause 15 of the letters patent. what constitutes a judgment has been the subject-matter of several decisions. in asrumati devi v. rupendra deb raikot, : [1953]4scr1159 , the supreme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1997 (HC)

Badanaboyina Veera Nageswara Rao Vs. Badanaboyina Rama Devi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(5)ALT384

..... of the court. rules in this behalf thus are followed in appeals against original decrees and in appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent from judgments of single judges passed in appeals from appellate decrees or orders as well as in appeals subject to provision that in appeals against ..... is any inconsistency between the appellate side rules and the provisions of the code, the appellate side rules having been formulated pursuant to the letters patent power of the court as well as under section 122 of the code, under which it is permissible to annul, alter or add to ..... shall be drawn up in accordance with the judgment.'rules framed by this court by virtue of the power conferred upon it under the letters patent aforementioned and all other powers enabling it to frame rules of procedure and practice called 'the rules of the high court of judicature, andhra pradesh ..... the court, whether with or without the chief justice, are to constitute the several division courts.'3. clauses 37 and 38 of the letters patent respectively provide for regulation of proceedings in civil and criminal cases. clause 37 reads:'regulation of proceedings:-and we do further ordain that it shall ..... reorganisation act, 1956 (act 37 of 1956), this court has been established as a successor of the power of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent of the madras high court. ever since its establishment, the madras high court has exercised in such civil, criminal, admiralty, vice-admirality, testamentary, intestate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2000 (HC)

Krishna Ceramics and Refractories Vs. Dr. V.S. Krishna Ceramics and Po ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD1; 2000(4)ALT631

..... hearing. having due regard to the above noted well settled position in law, the additional plea taken by the appellants for the first time in the letters patent appeal has to be rejected in limine. we accordingly do so and hold that the additional plea taken by the appellants is hit by constructive resjudicata.43 ..... any necessity to dilate this aspect further, because, in our considered opinion, this additional plea taken by the appellants for the first time in the letters patent appeal by filing cmp no.10448 of 2000 is hit by constructive res judicata. when the respondent-plaintiff filed the suit os no.146 of 1980 for ..... by the learned single judge of this court have to be set at nought. we cannot entertain this plea taken for the first time in the letters patent appeal for more than one reason. 40. as no.1775 of 1986 arose out of the decree passed by the civil court in os no.132of ..... learned counsel putforth one more ground raised in cmp no.10448 of 2000 filed in this letters patent appeal. the additional ground is that in view of the judgment of the learned single judge in as no.1775 of 1986, that clause (15) of ..... defendants, and ultimately dismissed the appeal by his judgment and decree dated 26-4-2000 affirming the judgment and decree of the trial court. hence, this letters patent appeal.11. before us also, sri v.l.n.g.k. murthy, learned counsel appearing for the appellants urged the same three grounds. in addition, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2001 (HC)

Pulusam Krishna Murthy Vs. T. Sujan Kumar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD423; 2002(2)ALT77

..... 5(1) of v schedule. by a brief order dated 25-8-1989, the then chairman of the tribunal quashed g.o. ms. no.275 holding: it is therefore, quite patent from the said go that the governor, in the purported exercise of powers under paragraph 5(1) of v schedule to the constitution makes an order by notificalion that a ..... connection to the object sought to be achieved. article 14 does not insist upon classification, which is scientifically perfect or logically complete. a classification would be justified unless it is patently arbitrary. if there is equality and uniformity in each group, the law will not become discriminatory, though due to some fortuitous circumstance arising out of peculiar situation some included in ..... , : air1963sc649 , the apex court speaking through gajendragadkar, j., struck down the government order describing it as a fraud on the constitution and the action of the executive was characterized as 'patently and plainly outside the limits of the constitutional authority conferred on the state.'96. we are not oblivious of the fact that in union of india v. madhav, : (1997)illj977sc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1996 (HC)

A. Srinath and Others Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996AP309; 1996(2)ALT893; (1997)ILLJ255AP

..... provision would not enable courts, by implication, to supplement the letters patent importing into them all acts, ejusdem generis, passed by the governor-general in council and that the provision is only intended to empower the governor-general in council to legislate ..... in attyam venkatasub-barayadu v. sri rajah velugoti govinda krishna yachendrulu, (1917) 32 mad lj 144: (air 1917 mad 670) has held as follows: '. . . .section 44 of the letters patent says that the provisions are subject to the legislative powers of the governor-general in council. as at present advised we are in agreement with mr. subramania aiyar that this ..... said 1915 act until such time when the appropriate legislature by virtue of powers conferred by the constitution made any law on the subject.5. clause 15 of the letters patent of the bombay high court, which the pari materia, fell for consideration in national sewing thread company limited v. james cnadwick and brothers ltd., : [1953]4scr1028 . the question in ..... pradesh under the states reorganisation act, 1956 (act 37 of 1956), this court has been established as a successor of the power of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent of the madras court. ever since its establishment, the madras high court has exercised in such civil, criminal, admiralty, vice-admiralty, testamentary, intestate and matrimonial jurisdiction, original and appellate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1959 (HC)

Srimanthu Rajah Yarlagadda Sivarama Prasad Bahadur Zamindar Garu and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP364

..... . having regard to the terms of rule 14, reliance is placed on rule 51 (1) of the appellate side rules which recites :'an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, other than an appeal from a judgment, decree or order passed or made by the high court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, shall be preferred within thirty days ..... 10 requires the memorandum of appeal in a writ appeal against the order of a single judge to be in the form prescribed for an appeal under the letters patent. it is, however, specifically stated there that it should be registered and numbered as a writ appeal. rule 11 reads: 'such memorandum shall be accompanied by--(1) the fee prescribed ..... petitions as supporting their contention that writ appeals could also be filed within 30 days. rule 14 says :'all other rules relating to appeals under the letters patent will apply to these appeals, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the foregoing rules.'this rule should be understood in the context in which it occurs. rule ..... limitation act.3. another point that was sought to be made was that the period of limitation for filing writ appeals should be the same as that for the letters patent appeals. this is founded on the rules framed by this court for proceedings under article 226 of the constitution. it is rule 14 that is emphasizedby counsel in both the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2002 (HC)

B.F. Pushpaleela Devi Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, Educat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD1; 2002(5)ALT103

..... officer, salem housing unit, salem, 1996(2) law weekly 117 rendered by k.a. swami, cj and one of us - dr. justice ar. lakshamanan,. in that case a letters patent appeal was preferred against the order passed by the learned single judge in a contempt application. the learned single has recorded a categorical finding that the complainant-appellant had failed ..... para 28 held as follows:the proper way of reconciling the several paragraphs in the judgment is to hold that the supreme court accepted that clause 15 of the letter patent gave an independent jurisdiction conferring right of appeal against 'judgments' of learned single judges of the high court whether passed in original jurisdiction or first appellate jurisdiction under section ..... appeal against orders falling under various clauses of order 43, rule 1 to a larger bench of the high court without at all disturbing, interfering with or overriding the letters patent jurisdiction. 23. referring to the decision in shankarlal aggarwal vs. shankarlal proddar, : [1964]1scr717 it was further observed at para 33:there is yet another aspect of the matter ..... m. srinivas vs . jawaharlal nehru techoological unviersity, hyderabad, : 1991(3)alt1 (fb). in this case, the full bench held that writ appeal is maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent appeal before this bench. the next judgment on the issue is reported in executive officer, group temples, guntur vs . dasaratha rama rao, : 1999(4)ald164 (db). the judgment in this .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //