Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Page 9 of about 2,101 results (0.099 seconds)

Oct 14 1997 (HC)

B. Sudarshan Reddy Vs. Joint Collector, R.R. Dist, Hyderabad and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD648; 1998(1)ALT12

..... which were said to have been alienated in their favour in the year 1959.the manipulation of these entries inserting the names of these three transferees in different ink, is patent even to the naked eye. i do not know how the mandal revenue officer failed to inform the joint collector on this aspect while submitting the true copies of pahanies ..... applicable to the facts in this case.19. where no innocent third party interests have crept in and where the nature of fraud or mis-representation is so glaring and patent crying out for judicial correction and where the vendor and vendees are parties to the fraud played on the state, it becomes the duty of the revisional authority to take .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2005 (HC)

P.R. Periakaruppan Vs. Chola Chits and Finance (P) Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2005AP471; 2005(5)ALT345

..... the registrar of chits, chittoor, and the other officers referred to above. the plaintiff submits that those two statements made by the defendant referred to in quotations above, are defamatory, patently false on the face of them. the said statements are clearly understandable by right thinking of reasonable minded persons as referring to plaintiff's activities in the chit transaction and ..... the plaintiff's company for the last about 10 years, he know their work, honesty, efficiency and working of the said company and with all these, the defendant made a patently defamatory statement by making false allegations and by making publish by sending the authorities, but in their turn they discharged their duties by taking the files relating to the chit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2005 (HC)

H.A. Mohan Kumar and ors. Vs. P. Muralidhar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD552

..... cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case, and the finality of the judgment delivered by the court will not be recognised except 'where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility'. chandra kanta v. sheikh habib, : [1975]3scr933 .9. now, besides the fact that most of the legal material ..... to the rules and cannot be lightly entertained. a review of a judgment is a serious step and reluctant resort to it is proper only where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error had crept in earlier by judicial fallibility. in the inmitable slight of expression, he stated that 'mere repetition through different counsel of old and overruled .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1995 (HC)

Peddapudi Seshagiri Rao Vs. Andhra University, Rep. by Its Registrar a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT820

..... are already examined by the original and appellate authority created for the said purpose, but also to avail the right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent of the court. any attempt to use the court's plenary power in such matters is nothing but making the legislative sanctions for special tribunals meaningless as proceedings ..... and the forum of appeal but two more forums - one under article 226 of the constitution of india and the another under clause 15 of the letters patent of the court. it appears to us reasonable thus to hold that a party seeking to invoke the court's extraordinary and plenary jurisdiction under article 226 of ..... under article 227 of the constitution, but not under article 226 thereof. it is obvious that in such a case the appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent shall not be maintainable. 10. it appears to us an abuse of the process of the court, if appeals are filed against interlocutory orders in the writ petitions ..... say that in no case appeal shall lie against an interlocutory order, but it is well settled that right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is available only against a final order and against such interlocutory orders which are in the nature of a final order and in some matters and in exceptional ..... it is not against an order of a moment which this court should quash in exercise of its power under clause 15 of the letters patent. 11. for the reasons aforementioned, we find no merit in the appeal. the appeal is dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1999 (HC)

Vellalacheruvu Fishermen Cooperative Society, Prakasam Dist. and Anoth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD657

..... .301 of 1999 cannot claim that they are legally admitted members of the society and they have locus standi inthe contempt case, more so having filed contempt appeal and letters patent appeal and withdrew them. for all these reasons, the application is dismissed with costs. advocate's fee rs.5,000/-.31. before deciding whether the contemnor flouted the orders of ..... for hearing they withdrew the same stating that they would like to file lpa against the said order on 25-9-1998. thereafter, they seemed to have filed a letters patent appeal and the same seemed to have come up before a division bench in sr stage on 25-9-1998 and their lordships while directing the office to post the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2001 (HC)

Andhra Sales Tax Practitioners and Consultants Association Vs. Anantha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD370; 2002(2)ALT250

..... genuine representation and having an over-view knowledge of the affairs of the assessee are authorized to represent without reference to any specialized proficiency in taxation or otherwise. it is patent that all those categories are lined up on an equal footing under section 288 for the purpose of representation of the case of the assessee and this equal eye . should .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2002 (HC)

Patakamuru Damodar Prasad and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD67; 2003(1)ALT407

..... rao, 1984 (2) alt 386, wherein it was observed:where no innocent third party interests have crept in and where the nature of fraud or misrepresentation is so glaring and patent crying out for judicial correction and where the assignee himself was a privy to the fraud played on the state, it becomes the duty of the authority to take action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Oblum Electrical Indust ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1980)17CTR(AP)266; [1981]127ITR409(AP)

..... of 14 years. the grantee has to pay 2% on the net ex-factory sales of lightning arresters and other products arising from the exploitation of the patent. thus, as pointed out by the tribunal, the payment of royalty is linked up with the sales. 5. having regard to all these circumstances and ..... in ciba's case : [1968]69itr692(sc) wherein the swiss company had granted to the assessee the full and sole right of licence under the patent to make use, exercise and vend the inventions specified in the agreement in india and also a licence to use some specified trade marks and deliver to ..... privity of contract, but he took the view that th claim for deduction should be made under s. 35a relating to the expenditure on acquisition of patent right or copyrights. in accordance with this provision, he allowed the claim pro rata 14 years. as against the said order the assessee preferred an appeal ..... it was provided that a royalty of 2% on the net ex-factory sales of lightning arresters and other products arising from the exploitation of the patent by the grantee in accordance with the said invention and marketed by them should be paid by the grantee to n.r.d.c. during the ..... and comprised the right to use the invention for non-linear resistor compound from conducting and semi-conducting materials such as graphite and silicon carbide covered by indian patent no. 55282 at the grantee's own factory, and to sell the product manufactured in accordance with the said invention. this was in consideration of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1960 (HC)

K. Ch. Jagannadha Rao Minor by Father and Guardian K. Elesha Vs. Secre ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961AP46

..... orders of an educational authority, the scope of my inteference is limited only to cases where that authority has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction, or has committed an error which is patent on the record or has done something which is manifestly opposed to the principles of natural justice. in this case there is no question of want of authority or jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1976 (HC)

Buddala China Venkata Rao and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1978]112ITR58(AP); [1978]41STC232(AP)

..... glaring and obvious cannot be similarly rectified. prima facie it may appear somewhat strange that an order which was good and valid when it was made should be treated as patently invalid and wrong by virtue of the retrospective operation of the amendment act.....' the action of the income-tax officer was held to be justified. to a like effect is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //