Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1955 Page 1 of about 10 results (0.090 seconds)

Sep 01 1955 (HC)

In Re: Putta Ranganayakulu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1955

Reported in : 1956CriLJ1049

..... provides for regulating the procedure in the case of criminal proceedings. the two-provisions, therefore, deal with distinct matters. when the same letters patent confers a power on the high court to make rules for constituting benches and also prescribes the procedure for regulating certain proceeding the latter cannot be so construed as to ..... court to make rules for constituting benches for disposing of matters coming before it, irrespective of the fact whether they pertained to its criminal or civil jurisdiction. the letters patent also contained provisions for regulating the procedure and practice to be followed in regard to civil and criminal cases coming before it, in exercise of its various jurisdictions.clause 38 ..... for the appellant also relied upon clause 38. letters patent (extracted supra) in support of his contention that the high court has no power to make rules in respect of the exercise of criminal jurisdiction and that the procedure is ..... then applicable to such a case. 15. assuming without admitting that the adaptation of laws order by necessary implication revoked the powers conferred on the high court by the letters patent or other statutes to make rules, the rules already made are saved under the express provisions of 'the aforesaid rule. 'i, therefore, reject this contention.16. learned counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1955 (HC)

Dodda Subba Reddi Vs. Gunturu Govinda Reddi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-06-1955

Reported in : AIR1961AP430

subba rao, c.j. 1. this is a letters patent appeal against the judgment of our learned brother umamaheswaram j. in second appeal no. 574 of 1950.2. the facts relevant to the question raised may be briefly stated. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1955 (HC)

Virina Soorayya Vs. Virina Mallayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-1955

Reported in : AIR1955AP229a; [1955]28ITR362(AP)

..... the subordinate judge's view that the said e. p. was barred by limitation and dismissed the appeal. but, in dismissing the appeal, he granted leave to prefer a letters patent appeal. one of the decree-holders his has preferred this appeal against the order of balakrishna ayyar j.(3) mr. rama rao, learned coiunsel for the appellant raised before us ..... subba rao, c.j.(1)this is a letters patent appeal against the judgment of balakrishna ayya j., of the madras high court. the question raised is one of limitation and the following facts may be useful for appreciating it.( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1955 (HC)

Vedulapalli Satyanarayana Murhty and Brothers and ors. Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-1955

Reported in : AIR1955AP248

..... of opinion between him and umamaheswaram j. under s. 12-b, madras general sales tax act, 1939, read with s. 98, civil p. c. and cl. 36 of the letters patent, it is only if there is a difference in opinion between the twojudges of a division bench, the point on which there is a difference between them should be referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1955 (HC)

In Re: Hanumantha Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-1955

Reported in : 1957CriLJ930

..... 528 at pp. 534 and 540(b), a special bench of three judges constituted by the chief justice in the exercise of his powers under clause 25 of the letters patent had to consider the scope and effect of section 27 of the indian evidence act. burn, j., without discussing the numerous cases cited before him. held as follows:section 27 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1955 (HC)

In Re: Yendrapragada Ramulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-1955

Reported in : 1957CriLJ949

..... 20 prescribe, or in the absence of any such rule, by means of a label, on or with the food; or(iv) where the food is the subject of a patent in force and is supplied in the state required by the specification thereof.section.-6(1) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (1), it shall be no defence to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1955 (HC)

Putta Venkatrayudu Vs. the State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-14-1955

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1225

..... thus:save as otherwise provided by this code or by any other law for the time being in force or, in the case of a high court by the letters patent or other instrument constituting such high court, no court, when it has signed its judgment, shall alter or review the same, except to correct a clerical error.this, indeed, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1955 (HC)

P. Narayana Vs. P. Seetharamayya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-1955

Reported in : AIR1955AP174

bhimasankaram, j.(1) this is an appeal against the decree and judgment of rajagopalan j. of the madras high court in s. a. no. 1746 / 48. the learned judge granted leave to both the appellant and the respondent before him to appeal against his decision. the respondent before us has therefore filed a memorandum of cross-objections.(2) the facts of the case may be briefly stated. the appellant and the respondent who were respectively the defendant and the plaintiff in o. s. no. 61 of 1945 on the file of the subordinate judge's court, vishakapatnam, out of which the present appeal arises, jointly obtained a transfer of the decree in o. s. no. 34 of 1935 on the file of that court, under a registered deed of transfer dated 5.3.1938, for a consideration of rs. 3,000/-. during the execution of the decree, an amount of nearly rs. 1,500/- was deposited into the executing court by the judgment-debtors and at the time of this suit, there was still a considerable balance outstanding. the plaintiff respondent filed the present suit for a declaration that he was entitled to sent suit for a declaration that he was entitled to receive the whole of the amount in deposit as also the amount thereafter to be recovered, alleging that though the transfer deed was taken in the names of both of them, he was the person solely interested in the transfer as the whole of the consideration passed from him along, though as he had taken some money from the defendant by way of loan for the purpose of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1955 (HC)

Anna and ors. Vs. State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-1955

Reported in : 1956CriLJ887

srinivasa chari, j.1. being a criminal case of murder where some of the accused have been sentenced to death and the case having come to us for confirmation of the sentences of death i ought to express my opinion about the case separately,2. these are three cases of confirmation and nine cases coming up in appeal on behalf of the accused who stood their trial before the sessions judge, parbhani, on charges of conspiracy and murder.in these cases accused nos. 1 and 2 have been sentenced to death under section 302, penal code, and they are represented by shri nandapurkar. accused 8 has also been sentenced to death under section 302 read with section 109 and he is represented by shri peerbhoy while accused 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 have been sentenced to transportation for life having been convicted under section 302 read with section 109. these accused are represented by shri deshmukh and shri nandapurkar. accused 9 also has been sentenced to transportation for life for offence under section 302 read with section 109 and he is represented by shri mur-tuza khan. we heard the arguments of the respective-counsel in detail.3. the facts of the case as alleged by the prosecution are that on 29-8-1954 after sunset and after it had become dark in a field called vithbha's field which is half a mile from a village called kothala, patri taluq, parbhani district, the aforesaid accused assembled together, surrounded the deceased shanker and accused 1 and 2 anna and saheb inflicted blows with axes on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1955 (HC)

Mohommed Pasha and ors. Vs. State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-21-1955

Reported in : 1956CriLJ1320

srinivasachari, j.1. these are second appeals, on behalf of the three accused in a criminal case. the second appeal was competent under the hyderabad criminal p.c. the charge was laid against three persons of an offence under section 342, indian penal code corresponding to section 409, indian penal code. the prosecution alleged that there was a local unit established under the commercial corporation, supply department of the hyderabad state in chartana, jithur taluq, parbhani district. this was established on 6th khurdad 1353 f and it is stated that this local unite was to receive the levy of grain supplied by cultivators and dispose it of as per the instructions of the govt. it is further stated that the district commercial officer of the corporation received an anonymous report that grain in the godown of this unit was sold by the members of the local unit. the d.c.o. directed the tehsildar to make enquiries & he also went to the spot, inspected the godowns and affixed seal on them. punchanama was made.it is stated that the d.c.o. who is the president of the commerial corporation made a report of the deficiency in the grain in the unit to the heads department who reported the matter to the police. on this report the the f.i.r. was issued on 12th dai 1355 f against shankerbua, accused 1, and ibrahim accused 2. subsequently on 29th dai 1355f another person's name also was included amongst the accused viz., mia jan alias mohd. pasha as an abettor. the chalan was filed on 10th .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //