Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.037 seconds)

Apr 19 1956 (HC)

The State of Andhra Vs. S. Kameswar Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-1956

Reported in : AIR1959AP39

..... judge. 5. we might observe that it was suggested bythe learned advocate for the respondent that theorder of bhimasankaram j. was not open to appealunder clause 15 of the letters patent not being a judg-ment' within the meaning of that clause. having re-gard to the terms of the order of the learned judge extracted above, which imposes a liability .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 1956 (HC)

Public Prosecutor Vs. Dr. B. Krishnasami and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-05-1956

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1066

..... the full bench, if it is an appeal which comes within the purview of clause 15 of the letters patent, the opinion given by the full bench could be canvassed and it would be open to the bench hearing the letters patent appeal to refer the matter once again to a full bench or a fuller bench if they feel a doubt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1956 (HC)

S.V. Jagannath Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-21-1956

Reported in : [1956]30ITR726(AP)

..... of the supreme court that the appeal was not competent. their lordships after considering the case of harihar gir v. commissioner of income-tax, bihar & orissa, clause 31 of letters patent of the patna high court, tata iron and steel co.'s case and the observations of lord esher in knight and the tabernacle building society in re observed at page ..... merely advisory and not in the proper and legal sense of the term 'final' and that having regard to the change in the language in clause 39 of the letters patent where the words are 'from any final judgment, decree or order' and that in section 2(b) of act 1 of 1948, where the words were 'any judgment, decree or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1956 (HC)

Putchalapalli Venkata Subbareddi Vs. Duvvuru Papireddi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-11-1956

Reported in : 1957CriLJ923

..... such power to extend the time. the case therefore turned upon the construction of the particular rules framed by the allahabad high court in regard to the filing of letters patent appeals. the decisions in muttoor moideen hajee, in re air 1923 mad 95(g) and kristo singh sardar v. secretary of state air 1927 pat 333(h), have also no ..... decision in baijnath v. dulari hajiam ilr 50 all 865 : air 1928 all 708(p). the question that arose was whether section 5 of the limitation act applied to letters patent appeals. it was held that under the old rules framed by the allahabad high court there was power to extend the time for good cause shown but that under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1956 (HC)

In Re: Pudi Ramulu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-20-1956

Reported in : 1957CriLJ1213

..... the benefit of any doubt to the accused. besides cases raising questions of outstanding difficulty or importance to be settled by the supreme court, there may be cases where a patent mistake in the judgment is brought to the notice of the high court. an illustration of this type of case is given in nar singh v. state of uttar pradesh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //