Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 16 results (0.052 seconds)

Dec 05 1958 (HC)

Datla China Appalanarasimha Raju Vs. Nadimpalli Seethayamma Garu and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-05-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP310

..... bhima-sankaram, granted a temporary injunction restraining the appellant from obtaining delivery of items i and 3,' subject to certain conditions. against this order the appellant preferred the above letters patent appeal.2. when this appeal came on for hearing before the referring bench, it was contended by the appellant that the application fora temporary injunction to restrain mm from taking ..... full bench judgment. this case comes directly under order 39 of the code of civil procedure. the question that is involved in the main appeal out of which the letters patent appeal arises is as to who has got better title to the properties. the respondents claim title from the maharani of jeypore under a gift who had certain rights in ..... determined finally in the suit. in these circumstances, we do not think that the learned judge was wrong in granting interim injunction pending disposal of the appeal.24. the letters patent appeal is dismissed with costs; advocate's fee is fixed at rs. 50/-.

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1958 (HC)

Ahmed Ali Khan Bahadur (Died) and anr. Vs. Banguluru Veeralla and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-20-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP280

..... point of limitation was the date when the plaintiff exercised his option to avoid the transfer ; vide air 1926 mad 66 ; 22 mad lw 592. that was a letters patent appeal against the decision of krishnan j., in second appeal. venkata subba rao j. thought that his view was the view that krishnan j. intended to hold: but we ..... learned judge held that there was no substance in any one of the contentions and consequently dismissed the appeals in and by his judgment dated 5-10-1953. these letters patent appeals are against that judgment. 10. before us, the same points were urged by mr. venkatarama sastry and mr. nethi subrahmanyam, the learned counsel for the appellants and ..... shoukat begum. sulaiman ali khan also died pending the suit and so his legal representatives ahmed ali, murdadi begam and imadi begum the appellants in this batch of letters patent appeals were added as the legal representatives of the 2nd plaintiff sulaiman ali khan. on 30-9-1924 a decree was passed declaring that the decree obtained in o.s ..... the high court of madras which arise out of o.s. no. 16 of 1947 and other 9 connected suits on the file of the sub-court, tenali. letters patent appeals nos. 68 to 72 of 1954 are against the decision in civil miscellaneous appeals nos. 442 to 446 of 1948 which arise out of the decision of the ..... seshachelapati, j. 1. this is a connected batch of letters patent appeals against the judgment of subba rao. l.p.a. nos. 67 and 73 to 81 of 1954 are against a.s. nos. 199 of 1948 and a.s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1958 (HC)

Alapati Sriramamurty and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP377; 1959CriLJ822

..... judge reports in favour of the accused, he need not be represented in the high court, particularly when the illegality of [he conviction or the severity of the sentence is patent. on the other hand, if such a salutary rule of practice were not to prevail, there would be a temptation, and even an encouragement, to accused per-sons to come .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 1958 (HC)

B. Veeraswamy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-20-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP413

..... the above-mentioned judgment of the division bench and he therefore held that the regional transport officer had no power to effect the variation. this judgment was taken in letters patent appeal in w.a. nos. 56 and 57 of 1956. krishnaswami nayudu and ramaswami jj., before whom the appeals came on for hearing, came to the conclusion that the earlier .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1958 (HC)

K.V. Seshavataram Vs. State of Hyderabad (Now Andhra Pradesh)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP251; (1959)IILLJ277AP

..... he was officiating, to his substantive post in class iii service. a learned judge of the high court had allowed a writ petition against the aforesaid order, but in letters patent appeal the judgment was reversed. in the appeal to the supreme court das, c.j., who delivered the majority judgment of the court has observed as follows at page 48 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1958 (HC)

Repaka Appalanarasimham and ors. Vs. Repaka Udalama and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP407

..... . there was a difference of opinion between satyanarayana rao j. and panchapagesa sastry j. and the appeal was therefore heard by viswanatha sastry j. under clause 36 of the letters patent. while satyanarayana rao j. held that communication was necessary to all the members of the family, panchapagesa sastry j. took the view that the communication to the manager alone was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1958 (HC)

Chunduri Venkata Reddy Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-14-1958

Reported in : [1959]35ITR87(AP)

..... their own expellers, the firm at lahore calling its expellers as 'chisty diamond' and the firm at bezwada 'andhra diamond', and neither of the parties was permitted to imitate the patent of the other. above all, the most important clause was that the lahore merchant was to give four expellers, two 'n. s. sholer type' and two 'standard type', free of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1958 (HC)

Murali Krishna Rice Mill Vs. Additional Income Tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-1958

Reported in : [1959]36ITR239(AP)

..... act thus provides a hierarchy of tribunals where the petitioner can agitate his contentions. mr. ranganathachari, however, has submitted that the want of jurisdiction in the income-tax officer being patent, the petitioner should not be driven to seek his remedies before the authorities provided under the act and that this is a fit case for the exercise of jurisdiction under ..... jurisdiction, which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner gives jurisdiction to this court to quash the assessment order itself at this stage, cannot be said to be so patent. having regard to the undoubted and adequate remedies which the petitioner has under the income-tax act and having regard to the further fact that the petitioner has himself taken .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1958 (HC)

In Re: Godavarthy Bhashyakaracharyulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1958

Reported in : AIR1960AP164; 1960CriLJ315

..... , criminal procedure code can save the accused. for the principle of autrefois convict to have any bearing, there must be ft conviction in respect of the same offence. jt would be a patent violation of the principle and a contravention of the terms of section 403 if the accused should ask for relief on that principle. it is a distinct offence altogether that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1958 (HC)

Shankerlal Karva Vs. Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-27-1958

Reported in : [1958]9STC246(AP)

..... not admittedly done.3. under the aforesaid circumstances, i find no warrant in law for the recovery of the amount of rs. 2, 500 from the petitioner. there being a patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the respondents in recovering the tax from the petitioner, a writ of prohibition will issue restraining the respondents from recovering the amount of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //