Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1961 Page 1 of about 18 results (0.047 seconds)

Oct 13 1961 (HC)

Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. Vendra Venkanna, Proprietor of Jai Bhara ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-13-1961

Reported in : AIR1963AP58

..... for the cement concrete of his make. the plaintiff-company was not entitled to any reliefs with regard to the alleged infringement of its patent as the patent had expired even before the filing of the suit. 12. it would appear that the plaintiff had given up the relief for accounts and ..... defendant) and its partners impleaded as defendants 2 to 5. the plaintiff claimed damages estimated at rs. 9,000/- for an alleged infringement of the patent. the other reliefs as claimed against the defendant in o.s. 53 of 1954 were also claimed against these defendants. 8. the defendants repudiated the ..... defendant-concern and sent his engineers and got the property and machinery valued. the plaintiff and its engineers never complained that the defendant had infringed the patent rights of the plaintiff. 7. the defendants in o.s. 54 of 1954 are the firm, sri radhakrishna reinforced cement pipe and ferro concrete works ..... pipes, had infringed the rights of the plaintiff by manufacturing and selling cement concrete pipes under the plaintiff's trade mark and name and using the patented machine and method for manufacturing the said cement pipes. 3. the defendant in o.s. no. 30 of 1954 is one vendra venkanna, proprietor ..... an alleged infringement of the trade mark of the plaintiff in relation to cement concrete pipes manufactured and sold by the plaintiff and of the patent registered in relation to the said cement concrete pipes. 2. the plaintiff's case in brief is that it is a long standing manufacturer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1961 (HC)

Devi Dayal Marwah Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-1961

Reported in : AIR1963AP479

..... the business of the hyderabad potteries and to carry on the business of manufacturers, buyers and dealers in all kinds of clay work, chemical preparations and glazes whatsoever and obtain patents for them to carry out the other objects as set forth in the memorandum of association. on the 1st october, 1947, the company executed a deed of mortgage in favour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1961 (HC)

Vadapalli Krishnamacharyulu and anr. Vs. Sidda Veeraraju and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-13-1961

Reported in : AIR1964AP527

chandra reddy, c.j.1. this raises the question whether a letters patent appeal could be filed against the judgment of a single judge of this court allowing an appeal brought by the respondents against the order of the subordinate judge, kakinada, remanding a suit brought by the appellants to the trial court for disposal on merits.2. the learned counsel for the appellants urges that an appeal is competent for the reason that the impugned judgment was passed in a civil miscellaneous appeal and as such it falls within the purview of clause 15 of the utters patent and that it falls outside nagamma v. venkattasubbiah, (1959) 2 andh wr 554. we do not think that we can give effect to this contention. notwithstanding the fact that the appeal presented by the respondents was described as a civil miscellaneous appeal, it was a second appeal in that it was preferred against the judgment of the lower appellate court passed in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction. consequently, despite the nomenclature of the appeal as a civil miscellaneous appeal, it does not cease to be a second appeal. hence, without the leave of the judge who has given the judgment now impeached before us, a fetters patent appeal is not competent.3. we, therefore, hold that the appeal as presented cannot be entertained. however, this does not preclude the appellants from filing a letters patent appeal, if they could validly obtain the leave of the judge concerned.

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1961 (HC)

Mudragada Suryanarayanamurthi Vs. Southern Agencies, Rajahmundry and a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-18-1961

Reported in : AIR1962AP271

..... rejected by our learned brother, sanjeeva row nayudu j., and the appeal was dismissed. this appeal is filed by the appellant against that judgment under clause 15 of the letters patent. (2) one of the questions raised before our learned brother sanjeeva row nayudu, j., was whether an appeal lay against the order dismissing e.a. no. 144/57 and it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1961 (HC)

Shahnavaz Begum and Two Others Being Minors by Guardian Ekbalunnisa Be ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-22-1961

Reported in : AIR1964AP233

..... , the 5th plaintiff died and her heir was impleaded as the 7th plaintiff.(8) aggrieved by the judgment of bhimasankaram j. plaintiffs 2, 3 and 4 have preferred this letters patent appeal.(9) the short question that falls for determination is whether section 7 of the act governs this litigation. this in its turn, depends upon whether the lessee is a ..... chandra reddy, c.j.1.this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is against the judgment of bhimasankaram, j. affirming that of the subordinate judge, vijayawada in appeal no. 17 of 1955.2. the facts culminating in this appeal lie in a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1961 (HC)

Fatimunissa Begum Saheba and ors. Vs. Shaik Abu Baker Saheb and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-1961

Reported in : AIR1963AP119

p. chandra reddy, c. j.1. this is an appeal by the defendants under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of srinivasachari j. in a. s. no. 362/1956 reversing that of the subordinate judge, nellore, and remitting the case to the trial court for fresh disposal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 1961 (HC)

Jalappa Vs. Narasimha Setty and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-1961

Reported in : AIR1963AP420

..... findings of the district munsif and dismissed the appeal.12. in second appeal, our learned brother, srinivasachari, j. affirmed the decision of the lower appellate court.13. in this letters patent appeal, sri venkatramayya for the appellant-plaintiff has presented the appellant's case of redemption thus : the usufructuary mortgage deed, ex. a. 1, has specifically stated that the amount borrowed ..... narasimham, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal against the judgment of srinivasachari, j. in s.a. 693 of 1956 affirming the judgment of the subordinate judge, anantapur in a.s. 3 of 1955 and dismissing the ..... he. a suit for redemption could lie only if there is a subsisting mortgage. the mortgage having been discharged, the suit is manifestly misconceived.33. we, therefore, dismiss the letters patent appeal with costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1961 (HC)

Chitoory Venkataraju Vs. M. Venkatarajamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-10-1961

Reported in : AIR1963AP189

..... a. a. o. no. 179 of 1956. the facts leading upto the appeal are shortly as fallows :2. the appellant in this letters patent appeal is the holder of two promissory notes in his favour dated 7-12-33 and 8-2-34 for rs. 2700/- and 2000/- respectively from the first judgment-debtor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1961 (HC)

Chilakamarti Kotaiah Vs. Addanki Venkata Subbaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-1961

Reported in : AIR1962AP49

..... 942) which, under similar circumstances decided that the suit was not opposed to sec. 66, c. p. c. however, the learned judge granted leave under clause 15 of the letters patent. when the appeal came up for hearing before a bench of this court, it was referred to a full bench, as it was represented by counsel on either side that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1961 (HC)

Dalavai Nagarajamma Vs. State Bank of India, Cuttapah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-1961

Reported in : AIR1962AP260

..... the first defendants in o. s. no.13 of 1955 on the file of the district court, cuddapah against the judgement of umamaheswaram, j., under clause 15 of the letters patent.(2) the facts leading up to this litigation are the following. one dalavayi ramaswami, who was a deputy superintendent of police, died on 15-7-1954. he left a fixed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //