Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 28 results (0.036 seconds)

Apr 04 1963 (HC)

Sheik HussaIn and Sons Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP36

..... ). that case was decided by the judicial committee of the privy council as far back as 1886. the suit was for damages and an injunction for infringment of a patent under the patents and designs act. such a suit can only be brought in a district court but it was brought in the court of the subordinate judge, who had no jurisdiction ..... conflict of judicial opinion, as to whether the grant of the writ was discretionary or not, the authorities seem unanimous in deciding that, where the want of jurisdiction is patent, the grant of the writ of prohibition is of course.'20. the principle has been succinctly stated in halsbury's laws of england, simond's third edition volume 9, page ..... recognised a distinction between what i will call a latent want of jurisdiction, i.e., something becoming manifest in the course of the proceedings, and what i will call a patent want of jurisdiction i.e., a want of jurisdiction apparent on the face of the proceedings.while in cases of latent want of jurisdiction there has always been a great .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1963 (HC)

Tirumareddi Rajarao and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-1963

Reported in : AIR1965AP388

..... by the high court on 5-4-1942. this was reversed in appeal by the high court on 5-4-1944. finally, the execution petition was dismissed on a letters patent appeal on 15-3-1945. on 5-6-1946, the appellant before the supreme court brought a suit claiming a different relief which need not be set out here, in ..... may also notice another passage occurring in the same page and called in aid by the learned government pleader.'to prosecute an action for infringement of a patent 'with due diligence' (proviso to s. 32, patents , designs and trade marks act, 1883, 46 and 47 vict c. 57 ), does not necessarily require that the action should be carried on to trial.'we .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1963 (HC)

Chalavada Venkata Subbarao and Co. and anr. Vs. Grandhi Sree Ramulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-03-1963

Reported in : AIR1965AP16

..... approved the decision of the full bench of the rangoon high court and held that 'an order for transfer of a suit made under cl. 13 of the letters patent, is not a judgment within the meaning of cl. 15 and therefore is not applicable.' this conclusion was rested on the ground that the order neither affects the ..... ) in khatizan v. sonairam, air 1920 cal 797 (2) the high court of calcutta held that an order for transfer of a suit made under cl. 13 of the letters patent was not a 'judgment' within the meaning of cl. 15. the learned judges, mookerjee, a. c. j. , and fletcher j. , relied for this view upon the ..... 1) the question for decision is whether the following order made by our learned brother gopalrao ekbote j., is a 'judgment' within the meaning of cl. 15 of the letters patent : -'post appeal no. 21 of 1960 along with appeal no. 188 of 1959 before a bench'. clause 15 reads as follows : - 'and we do further ordain ..... from that of the calcutta and madras high courts as regards the meaning of the word 'judgment' in cl. 13 of the rangoon letters patent, which corresponds to cl. 15 of the letters patent of the calcutta and madras high courts. it was held by the full bench of the rangoon high court that 'the term 'judgment' in ..... the letters patent means and is a decree in a suit by which the rights of the parties in the suit are determined 'and that' in other words, a ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1963 (HC)

Sattemma Vs. Vishnu Murthy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-05-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP162

..... ancestor of the present order 43, rule 1 c. p. c. it is true that their lordships did not specifically refer to clause 15 of the letters patent. but, it is plain from the observations that the 'judgment' falling within the purview of that clause is excepted from the scope of section 588 of act ..... council, as hereinafter provided.'5. we are clear in our minds that order 47, rule 7 c. p. c. does not override clause 15 of the letters patent; on the other hand clause 15 prevails over order 47, rule 7 c. p. c.6. this opinion of ours gains support from the pronouncement of the privy ..... . p. c. controls clause 15 of the letters patent, an appeal does not lie notwithstanding that the decision complained against is a 'judgment' within the scope and ambit of clause 15. what calls for decision is whether clause ..... a petition for review having regard to the provisions of order 47, rule 7 c. p. c. and that this provision of law prevails over clause 15 of the letters patent. undeniably, order 47, rule 7 c. p. c. postulates that an order rejecting an application for review is not appealable. so, if order 47, rule 7 c ..... , c.j.1. the question to be answered by the full bench relates to the maintainability of an appeal, under clause 15 of the letters patent, against an order of a single judge of this court refusing to review an order passed by him earlier dismissing the petition for leave to prefer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1963 (HC)

The State of Andhra (Now Andhra Pradesh) Represented by the Collector, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-03-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP450

..... plaintiffs' was allowed and consequently the plaintiffs' suit in its entirety was decreed. it is this judgment of sanjeeva row nayudu, j., which is the subject of the present letters patent appeal.5. the government pleader argued that the suit lands were granted to the plaintiffs and defendants nos. 3 to 18 subsequent to g. o, no. 57 dated 7-6 ..... ekbote, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is preferred by the 1st defendant, the state of andhra pradesh, from a judgment of our learned brother, sanjeeva row nayudu, j., given on i4th november, 1960, whereby he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1963 (HC)

Prabhakara Rao H. Mawle Vs. Hyderabad State Bank

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP101

..... . that appeal was heard by our learned brother, munikannaiah, j., who in an elaborate and well-considered judgment dismissed the appeal. the present appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is directed against that judgment.7. the first contention urged by the judgment-debtor in support of this appeal is that e.p. no. 183/3 of 1952-53 dated ..... gopalakrishnan nair, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is from the appellate judgment dated 19th january, 1963 of our learned brother, munikannaiah, j. the matter relates to proceedings in execution of a money decree passed against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1963 (HC)

Gultupalli Hanumayya and ors. Vs. Ravella Venkata Subbayya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-05-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP68

..... of the execution petition notwithstanding the continued existence of the court which passed the decree.5. it is this conclusion that is challenged in this letters patent appeal filed under clause 15 of the letters patent.6. as the records did not disclose whether the appellants had an opportunity to raise this objection in the earlier execution petitions, we called for a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1963 (HC)

Chandika Venkata Reddi and ors. Vs. Chandika Kondamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-1963

Reported in : AIR1963AP484

..... court proved unsuccessful. 7. the second appeal to this court also shared the same fate. however, our learned brother, anantanarayana ayyar, j., granted leave under clause (15) of the letters patent. 8. the conclusion of our learned brother is challenged before us by sri srirama sastry, learned counsel for the appellants, on the argument that the surrender could not be treated ..... that is posed by this appeal directed against the judgment of our learned brother, anantanarayana ayyar, j., in s. a. no. 676 of 1957 under clause (15) of the letters patent, filed with his leave, is whether a surrender in favour of a remote reversioner is void or voidable at the instance of the nearest reversioner. 2. the facts of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1963 (HC)

Ajjarapu Subbarao Vs. Pulla Venkata Rama Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-27-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP53

gopalakrishnan nair, j.1. this is a plaintiff's letters patent appeal from the judgment of sanjeeva row nayudu, j. who, on appeal, reversed the decree of the trial court and dismissed the suit. the corner stone of the plaintiff's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1963 (HC)

Yellamanchili Veera Raghavayya Vs. Madduri Venkata Subbaraya Sastri an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-09-1963

Reported in : AIR1964AP94

chandra reddy, c.j. 1. this appeal, under clause 15 of the letters patent, is filed by an auction-purchaser against the order of san-jeeva row nayudu, j. setting aside that of the district judge, east godavari, dismissing a petition filed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //