Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.052 seconds)

Dec 30 1967 (HC)

irrumathirumala Nallanchakravarthi Sampathkumara Jagannatha Tiruvenkat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-30-1967

Reported in : AIR1969AP303

..... of all terms which can be used, as it is indicative and descriptive of every possible interest that a person can have. it includes rights such as trade marks, copyrights, patents and personal rights, or a share-certificate capable of transfer or transmission. it is for this reason ghulam hasan, j., in dwarakadas v. sholapur spg. and wg. co., : [1954]1scr674 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 27 1967 (HC)

Chirala Goverdhanareddy and anr. Vs. Election Tribunal, Bapatla and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-27-1967

Reported in : AIR1970AP56

..... 21 years of age, within the meaning of article 326 of the constitution, was out side the juirsdiction of the election tribunal. there upon the first respondent filed the letters patent appeal which was considered by the division bench. ramakrishnan j., who delivered the main judgment, reviewed the entire case law and observed in paragraph 14 that:'before us, learned counsel ..... of tribunals, to act in accordance with the provisions of the constitution, and whenever and at whatever stage, their attention is drawn to the fact that there has been a patent violation of a constitutional provision, whether in legislating an enactment or in preparing a statutory instrument, the court as well as tribunals have a duty to give effect to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 14 1967 (HC)

Prince Azam Jah Vs. Expenditure-tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-14-1967

Reported in : [1970]78ITR364(AP)

..... discretion to the legislature in the matter of classification in a fiscal enactment, that a fiscal enactment is, like other laws, subject to equality clause, that it shall not be patently or in effect arbitrary and oppressive but all the same the court cannot for obvious reasons meticulously scrutinise the impact of its burden on different persons or interests, that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1967 (HC)

Katragadda Ramayya and anr. Vs. Kolli Nageswararao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-1967

Reported in : AIR1969AP250

p. jaganmohan reddy, c.j.1. manohar pershad, j. (as he then was) and kumarayya, j., after hearing fully this letters patent appeal, preferred against a judgment of sharfuddin ahmed, j., referred the case to a full bench because not only a question as to whether sec. 19 of the indian limitation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1967 (HC)

Evuru Venkata Subbayya Vs. Srishti Veerayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-28-1967

Reported in : AIR1969AP92

p. jaganmohan reddy, c.j. 1. this letters patent appeal filed on the grant of leave by our learned brother kumarayya, j., involves the determination of the true scope and ambit of clause (5) of rule 32 of order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1967 (HC)

Movva Butchamma Vs. Movva Venkateswararao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-1967

Reported in : AIR1969AP136

chinnappa reddy, j.1. the applicant in this appeal under c1. 15 of the letters patent filed the suit out of which the appeal arises for a mandatory injunction for removal of certain obstructions placed on plots marked 2 (a) and (3) (a) in the plan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1967 (HC)

K. Venkata Subbayya Vs. District Collector, Chittoor and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-1967

Reported in : AIR1969AP381

..... aforesaid said decisions that the jurisdiction exercised by the high court under article 226 is extraordinary or special original jurisdiction as distinct from ordinary civil jurisdiction conferred by the letters patent. 12. the calcutta high court had occasion to deal with the scope of article 183 of the limitation act in manmatha nath v. gopee ballav, : air1951cal170 . that ..... from appellate or revisional jurisdiction and that although the jurisdiction is original, it is a special jurisdiction and should not be confused with the ordinary civil jurisdiction under the letters patent. 11. a division bench of this court consisting of subba rao, c. j., and jaganmohan reddy, j. (as he then was ) in satyanarayanamurti v. income-tax appellate ..... of ordinary original jurisdiction of the high court. sir john beaumont observed; 'any original civil jurisdiction possessed by the high court and not in express terms conferred by the letters patent or later enactments falls within the description of ordinary original civil jurisdiction.'10. the calcutta high court in budge municipality v. mongru, 57 cal wn 25 = (air 1953 ..... , original and appellate, and all such powers and authority for and in relation to, the administration of justice in the said presidency as her majesty might, by such letters patent aforesaid, grant and direct, subject, however, to such directions and limitations as to the exercise of original, civil and criminal jurisdiction beyond the limits of the presidency town, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1967 (HC)

Andhra Scientific Company Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1967

Reported in : (1969)ILLJ16AP

..... agree with the contention on behalf of the employers that in granting the scale of pay as per classification notification, ex. w. 3, the tribunal below has fallen into a patent error of law. it must be remembered that the award sought to preserve the continuity of service, and continuity of service cannot be assured unless a person affected gets all ..... which he would have got but for the interruption in service. that is the view taken by the labour court and i am unable to say that there is any patent error in that. so this ground of attack must fail.17. as regards the grant of bonus, however, it seems to me that the tribunal below has fallen into a ..... patent error in granting bonus to the employee for the relevant period. what the award granted to the employee was ' back-wages' from 1 to 15 january 1959 and from 1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1967 (HC)

Radha Bai Vs. Banka Chinnayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-1967

Reported in : AIR1968AP353

..... zamindar of marungapuri, who was not a party to a writ petition before subba rao, j., (as he then was), could file an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. on a review of the authorities indian and english, a bench of the madras high court consisting of rajamannar, chief justice and venkatarama aiyar, j., held that a person, who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1967 (HC)

J.C. Nagireddy Vs. P. Nagamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-1967

Reported in : AIR1968AP298

basi reddy, j.1. this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is directed against the order of obul reddi j., dated 3-11-1966 made in writ petition no, 1153 of 1965, whereby the learned judge quashed the order of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //