Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.046 seconds)

Sep 02 1968 (HC)

Thirmala Reddy Mahalakshmamma Vs. Mulkluri Murlidahar Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-1968

Reported in : AIR1970AP194

..... transfer merely because ther is a dispute regarding jurisdiction. in narain das v. khunni lal, (air 1934 all 569), iqbal ahmad, j., held tht court toentertain a suit is not patent or is ot admitted, the power of the high court to trnsfer a sut is untrammelled by any conditins and it si not necessary for the court before making an ..... a proper judicial process. ths case is really of no assistance because it was a case where the lack of jurisdiction of the subordinate judge to entertain the suit was patent and admitted and the order of transfer was itself made to get ever the plea of jurisdiction.6. in (1881) ilr 6 cal 30, an appeal was filed inadvertently in ..... a suit in the corut of a subordinate judge for damages for an alleged infringment of certain exclusive rights secured to him by three indian kpatents. s. 22 of the patents act expressly provided that such a sut could be laid only in the court of the district judge. the defendant filed a written statement objecting to the jurisdiction of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1968 (HC)

Satyanarayana Khaitan (P) Ltd., Chipurupalli Vs. Government of India a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-12-1968

Reported in : AIR1969AP410

..... for the respondent, statement of reasons by the central government in a case like the present was superfluous since the reason for the preference shown to the 3rd respondent was patent. he had been preferred because his application was received first. it is true that under s. 11(2) where two or more persons apply for a mining lease in respect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1968 (HC)

Ram Singh Mool Singh Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-19-1968

Reported in : AIR1970AP314

..... , it did not apply its mind to the relevant facts'. i have discussed at such great length and taken so long to arrive at a conclusion which may perhaps be patent to many minds because of the argument of the learned government pleader and because of the judgment of a division bench of the kerala high court in bhaskaran v. state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 1968 (HC)

Maturi Umamheswara Rao and ors. Vs. Pendyala Venkatrayudu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-01-1968

Reported in : [1970]40CompCas751(AP)

..... charge on calls made but not paid; (h) a charge on a ship or any share in a ship; (i) a charge on good will, on a patent or a licence under a patent, on a trade mark, or on a copyright or a licence under copyright. sub-section (8) provides the holding of debentures entitling the holder to a charge on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1968 (HC)

Katta Subbarao (Died) and ors. Vs. Pokuri Sri Ramalu and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-1968

Reported in : AIR1970AP258

..... been raised in the lower court. in the result subject to the modifications relating to the directions regarding accounting and interest he dismissed the appeal with costs. the present letters patent appeal is direct against the said judgment and decree.7. we are not inclined to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact of our learned brother and the trial court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1968 (HC)

Challa Appa Rao and Co. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-1968

Reported in : [1970]25STC256(AP)

..... said error of law is apparent on the face of the record. it may also be that in some cases, the impugned error of law may not be obvious or patent on the face of the record as such and the court may need an argument to discover the said error; but there can be no doubt that what can be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1968 (HC)

M. Kista Reddy and ors. Vs. Collector, Karimnagar Panchayat Wing and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-1968

Reported in : AIR1970AP180

..... of the members leaving space without transacting any business of the panchayat to cover up default. his case that the extension officer had taken away the earlier minutes book is patently false. if he had really convened any meeting, as shown in the new minutes book, he could have forwarded its proceedings to the district panchayat officer and to the panchayat .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1968 (HC)

Namilla Rachayya Vs. Gajula Nunna Narayanappa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-26-1968

Reported in : AIR1970AP278

..... appreciate the points of controversy. it will suffice our purpose to begin with pundarikakshudu's case 1957-1 andh wr 47 = (air 1957 andh pra 204). it was a letters patent appeal disposed of by subbarao, c. j. and qumar hasan, j. reversing the judgment of viswanatha sastri, j. in a second appeal. it arose out of a suit to enforce .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1968 (HC)

Mohammed FiazuddIn Khan Vs. Custodian Evacuee Property Andhara Pradesh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-1968

Reported in : AIR1969AP158

..... the high court of punjab for quashing the order of the custodian general and all the prior proceedings. the writ petition was dismissed by a single judge and a letters patent appeal against that order was also dismissed by a division bench of the punjab high court even at the stage of admission. thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1968 (HC)

Syed Jalal and ors. Vs. Tarrgopal Ram Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-1968

Reported in : AIR1970AP19

gopal rao ekbote, j. 1. the question which has to be answered in this letters patent appeal, is, where tow distinct decrees are passed in a suit and an appeal is preferred against only one of them, can it be said that it is an appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //