Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.036 seconds)

Aug 21 1969 (HC)

Chitturi Perraju and anr. Vs. Yednapudi Venkamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-1969

Reported in : AIR1971AP74

..... by the plaintiffs-decree-holders and its dismissal by the court. in view of that dismissal it felt that 'it will be only aggravating the controversy to direct delivery disregarding patent discrepancies'. for that reason, the present e. p. no. 17 of 1960 was dismissed by the court of first instance. we cannot understand these observations as a finding, after necessary ..... not identifiable. if these two objections to the maintainability of the execution petition no. 17 of 1960 (out of which this l. p. a. arose) are valid. then this letters patent appeal should fail.5. the law on the point is well settled. the principle of res judicata applies not only to suits but also to the execution proceedings. the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1969 (HC)

P. Anthaiah and Sons Vs. Kummarikantha Dibbayya and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-1969

Reported in : AIR1970AP380

..... awarding the amount on the ground of loss of services of the deceased to the members of the family. against the said judgment, the first defendant filed the above letters patent appeal. the plaintiff did not question the decree of the court in the first appeal in so far as the trial court's decree was reduced by a sum of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1969 (HC)

Tammana Tatayya Vs. Maddi Kutumba Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-15-1969

Reported in : AIR1971AP177

..... not ascertained the defendants should pay the same court-fees a in the trial court. against the above order, the appellants filed these appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent.3. in these appeals, the question for consideration is whether the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal in a.s. no. 259/64 is correct. the view constantly ..... above appeals which involve a determination of proper court-fee payable on the memorandum of first appeal, arises in the following circumstances.2. the respondent in the above two letters patent appeal filed a suit in o.s. 36/63 in the court of subordinate judge, gudivada against the above appellants for recovery of a sum or rs.15,000. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1969 (HC)

Mantrala Rajagopalam Vs. Vemuri Venkata Subbba Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-11-1969

Reported in : AIR1970AP269

gopal rao ekbote, j. 1. the question which has to be answered in this letters patent appeal, is, where tow distinct decrees are passed in a suit and an appeal is preferred against only one of them, can it be said that it is an appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1969 (HC)

The Premier Insurance Co. Ltd., Madras Vs. Gokar Ranfaraju and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-03-1969

Reported in : AIR1970AP310

n. kumarayya, c.j. 1. this is an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order of a. d. v. reddy. j., in c. m. a. no. 306 of 1968.2. the c. m. a. arose out of o. p. no. 30 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1969 (HC)

Dharmiah and ors. Vs. the Chief Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Government of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-1969

Reported in : AIR1970AP236

..... what i have heard from learned counsel. if i err in my decision the aggrieved party has a remedy by way of an appeal under c1. 15 of the letters patent. 6. sri venkataramanaiah, amicus curiae and sri p. a. chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioners in w. p. nos. 3907 and 3962 if 1968 contended that the public employment (requirement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1969 (HC)

Ayipala Venkataraya Chetty Vs. Ayipala Ramachandriah Chetty and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-1969

Reported in : AIR1970AP411

..... should be limited within the ambit of the word 'appears' occurring in clause 9d-1) 'appears' meaning ' be visible' and ' be manifest' connoting something more than what is 'ex facie' patent and something less than discovery after deep delaying into the evidence in the case and that it is something betwixt and between the extremes and the line of demarcation will .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1969 (HC)

The Madras Mica Association and anr. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-1969

Reported in : [1970]25STC332(AP)

..... from other states is not subjected, to this tax, that produced or manufactured in this state has been subjected to the said tax. the legislative in competence besides is quite patent, as under section 7 of the principal act read with the amendment act, goods exported to any place outside the territory of india and connected with trade and commerce with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1969 (HC)

Tagoob Mohammad of Kanchili Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-10-1969

Reported in : [1971]28STC110(AP)

..... by 'c' form) rs. 2,07,896.18rs. 4,27,060.35 3. it is contended by the petitioner that the commercial tax officer, srikakulam district, respondent herein, is acting patently without jurisdiction in issuing the notice and proposing to assess the turnover in respect of 'watery cocoanuts' under the central act, that the expression 'cocoanuts' includes both watery cocoanuts and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1969 (HC)

Todupunoori Dubbiah Vs. Todupunoori Laxmiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-1969

Reported in : AIR1970AP253

..... also to the house which was not the subject-matter of the suit. the procedure to be followed in such cases under order xxiii rule 3 c. p. c. is patent enough. according to that provisions.'where it is provided to the satisfaction of the court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //