Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 18 results (0.048 seconds)

Nov 29 1971 (HC)

Hylam Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-29-1971

Reported in : [1973]87ITR310(AP)

..... the supreme court held that:' the assessee did not, under the agreement, become entitled exclusively even for the period of the agreement, to the patents and trade marks of the swiss company ; it had merely access to the technical knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical field which the swiss company ..... to maintain and keep on foot the aforesaid indian letter patents.19. it is under the terms of the above agreement that the assessee-company made various payments to the english company in the assessment ..... (5), the assessee-company was put under an obligation to use on the products and the invoices relating thereto the words ' manufactured under indian patent nos. 57094, 57095 and 57459 '. under clause (6) of the agreement, the assessee-company agreed to pay recurrent fees that may be necessary ..... company. the purpose for which the agreement dated december 7, 1959, was executed was that the assessee-company required a licence under the indian letter patent nos. 57094, 57095 and 57459, of which the english company was the proprietor, in order to produce copper-clad laminates, and pursuant to clause ..... laminated product. at the expiry of the period fixed in the agreement, the information that the assessee-company had acquired in respect of the patented processes under the terms of the agreement, was not returnable to the english company. whether the payment is made once for all, or periodically .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1971 (HC)

Bhoganadham Seshaian Vs. Budhi Veerabhadrayya (Died) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-15-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP134

..... no valid grounds could be shown for our interference with the equitable set off ordered by the learned single judge. 37. that should be enough to dispose of the letters patent appeal. but, since another court may take a different view of the question of law just now discussed it seems desirable and in deference to the order of reference and ..... gopal rao erbote, j. 1. this letters patent appeal has come to us on a reference made by our learned brothers narasimham and parthasarathi, jj. the learned judges thought that the main issue and the only question involved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1971 (HC)

Era Mallappa Vs. Sriram Venkatanarasiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-11-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP295

..... own right, ever since september 1941 when he obtained ex. b-4. this contention based on art. 144 is a new plea raised for the efforts time in this letters patent appeal. it was no doubt averred in the written statement that he has been in possession and enjoyment of the property in his own right ever since the date of ..... the purview of art. 134 of the limitation act'. leave to appeal was granted by him while dismissing the second appeal. hence this appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent by the plaintiff.3. the conclusion reached by the our learned brother that the transfer covered by ex. b-4 purports to be of absolute ownership in the property which ..... venkateswara rao, j.1. this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent arises out of a suit filed for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage and is directed against the judgment of our learned brother. parthasarathi, j. in s. a. no. 593 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1971 (HC)

Chakicherla Audilakshmamma Vs. Atmakaru Ramarao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-1971

Reported in : AIR1973AP149

..... by holding that the plaintiff has failed to make out that he is the nearest reversionary heir to the estate of late atmakuru venkatasubbayya.18. in the result, the letters patent appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. the court-fee payable on the memorandum of this appeal will be paid by the appellant.19. appeal dismissed. ..... 1. this letters patent appeal is filed against the judgment of venkatesam in a. s. no. 37 of 1962. the learned judge has allowed the appeal preferred by the defendants 1 to 5 to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 1971 (HC)

C.S. Rangaswamy Vs. Pedda Bidda and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP266

..... act that are entitled to entertain and decide the dispute between the parties in regard to the suit land. it is this view that is now questioned in this letters patent appeal.9. before we deal with the question which was raised before us, it is also necessary to mention that originally the trial court on 2-1-1957 held that ..... appeal on merits. the costs of this appeal will abide the result of the second appeal. the appellant will get back the court-fees paid on the memorandum of letters patent appeal.18. appeal allowed.

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1971 (HC)

Kadiyala Venkatasubbaiah and ors. Vs. Sarupuri Narayanamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP341

..... as has been seen earlier if it comes in the same document it assumes the character of a condition. if the two clauses therefore are read together, then it becomes patently clear that the absolute rights which were intended to be transferred to venkatasubbamma were subjected to a condition that in case she dies issueless the property would revert to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1971 (HC)

Sree Mullapudi Venkatarayud, Memorial Medial Trust, Tanuku Vs. Chirapu ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-02-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP362

..... under the (english) companies act 1862, to 1890, or incorporated by an act of parliament of the united kingdom or by an indian law or by royal charter or letters patent and includes a society registered under the societies registration act, 18960, and a registered society within the meaning of the co-operative societies act, 1912'.6. the act is divided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1971 (HC)

Tamma Venkata Pardhasaradhi Vs. Tamma Ramachandra Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP223

..... on 20th of december, the final decree. that was found by the lower court and the learned counsel is not able to show that it is wrong. it is thus patent that there is no irregularity in starting the execution proceedings as such. infact the sale set aside petition rests mainly on the alleged illegalities and irregularities in the sale. it ..... that the court has admitted the application or suit. as we have said it is the intention of the court that matters and not the appearance of parties. it is patent that whether an application or suit has been admitted or not has to be gathered from the circumstances of the case.6. decided cases also support the same view. panduranga .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1971 (HC)

Mrs. Freny Rashid Chenai Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-1971

Reported in : [1973]90ITR31(AP)

..... [1967] 65 i.t.r. 179 (bom.), wherein their lordships have held that:' a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long-drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may conceivably be two opinions. a decision ..... to be considered is whether the mistake in this case has been discovered by a long-drawn argument or debate, or is one which is obvious and patent from the record. in this connection, the learned advocate-general, appearing for the petitioner, relied upon the decision in t.s. balaram, income-tax ..... mistake in the assessment order, or a mere change of opinion on the part of the assessing officer, and (ii) whether that mistake is obvious and patent from the record, or it has to be discovered by elucidation, argument, debate or by a long-drawn argument, and whether that mistake has been ..... ' should not be equated with the expression ' apparent on the face of the record ': the mistake to be rectified should, however, be a mistake ' patent on the record and not a mistake which may be discovered by a process of elucidation, argument or debate. '36. as held by the supreme court in sidhramappa ..... [1971]82itr50(sc) the learned judge, hegde j., speaking for the supreme court, held that:' a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long-drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may, conceivably, be two opinions.'24. thus, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1971 (HC)

Kambham Ramamurty Reddi Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-1971

Reported in : AIR1972AP354

..... the liberal construction must ultimately flow from the words used in the section. if the words used in the section are capable of two constructions one of which is shown patently to assist the achievement of the object of the act. courts would be justified in preferring that construction to the other which may not be able to further the object .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //