Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.042 seconds)

Sep 26 1972 (HC)

Ampro Food Products Vs. Ashoka Biscuit Works and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP17

..... did not exclude such a defence. the absence of an express provision, such as the one contained in section 29 (2) in regard to a patent, in the case of a design, it, in my view, a ground for coming to the conclusion that such a defence is precluded in a suit based on the infringement ..... registered design was a new or original design. when the learned judge's attention was drawn to the fact that the case of patents it was expressly provided by section 29(2) of the patents and designs act, 1911 that every ground on which a patent might be revoked shall be available by way of defence to a suit for infringement of a ..... patent and that there was no similar provision in the case of a design the learned judge observed that the absence of a similar provision in the case of a design .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1972 (HC)

Pendela Narasimham and anr. Vs. Pendela Venkata Narasimham and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP162

..... cases do not help the respondents.21. we, therefore, overrule the preliminary objection and held that defendants 1 and 2 are competent to file this letters patents appeals, and this appeal is entertainable.22. we will next take up the contention of appellants' counsel on merits. the learned counsel contended that a ..... was reversed by the appellate court, any of the parties to the appeal, under order xli, rule 4 of the civil procedure code, could file a letters patent appeal against the appellate court's decree.14. if a debt contracted by a 'karta' of a joint family is not for a legal necessity ..... no. 4 alone had filed an appeal to this court against the whole decree, and defendants 1 and 2, the appellants in this letters patent appeal, were also party-respondents in the appeal before our learned brother. the learned single judge reversed the finding of the trial court and held ..... exonerated defendant no. 4 from his liability. to pay the detb.7. the correctness of the judgment of our learned brother is challenged in this letters patent appeal before us, by defendants 1 and 2.8. the counsel for the respondents- plaintiffs raised a preliminary objection that the appeal is not maintainable, ..... from the liability under the mortgage and substituted plaint b schedule property as security for a schedule property.2. the material facts leading to this letters patent appeal may briefly be stated; defendant no. 1 is the father of defendants 2 and 3 and 'karta' of the joint family comprising of himself .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1972 (HC)

Chargulla Sitarama Rao Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP120

..... his own men in his boats there was no infringement of plaintiff's right. against the said judgment, the plaintiff filed the present appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent.4. the main point for consideration in this appeal is whether the plaintiff has not an exclusive right within the area notified and whether such a right is infringed by ..... m. krishna rao, j.1. this appeal is filed by the plaintiff under cl 15 of the letters patent.2. the plaintiff filed the suit o. s. no. 2 of 1964 in the court of the agent to the government, government of andhra pradesh, khammam for an account of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 1972 (HC)

K. Asheram Vs. Abdulla and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-03-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP232

obul reddi, j.1. the short question that arises for consideration in this letters patent appeal is whether, by reason of the executing court having taken the execution petition out of its file and consigned the same to records, the right of a decree-holder ..... the judgment of our learned brother, a. d. v. reddy, j. and uphold the order of the executing court restoring e. p. no. 13/2 of 1355 fasli. the letters patent appeal is allowed with costs.12. appeal allowed.

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1972 (HC)

Amir Ali Khan and ors. Vs. Shahalam Khatoom and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-1972

Reported in : AIR1974AP23

obul reddi, j.1. the short and interesting question that arises in this letters patent appeal relates to the validity of ex. b-1, a gift deed (hiba nama) executed by one nabi khan on 2-6-1967 in favour of the 1st defendant. the ..... , hold that our learned brother was right in coming to the conclusion that the gift of the property in question was complete and valid.19. in the result, the letters patent appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed with costs.20. appeal dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1972 (HC)

M. Nageswara Rao Vs. S. Ramachandra Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP86

..... wall is a joint wall. in the end the decree of the lower appellate court was set aside and that of the trial court was restored.10. in this letters patent appeal, preferred by the defendant, sri challa sitaramayya learned counsel for the defendant-appellant raised the following questions:-1. there can be no easement in respect of light and air .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1972 (HC)

K.Y. Sodamma and anr. Vs. K. Gunneswarudu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP295

..... their lordships observed that they were not impressed by this argument, as ' in the first place decrees are passed in appeals heard under the letters patent only under the code of civil procedure. in the second place, section 114(b) does not require that orders and decrees should have been passed ..... mad 670 ) a question arose whether it is competent to the high court to review judgments in appeal preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent. one of the arguments advanced was that section 114 of the civil procedure code dealing with review cannot apply as it provides only for the review of ..... air1965all79 , where it was held that having regard to sections 117 and 122, civil procedure code. order 44 will apply to special appeal ( equivalent to a letters patent appeal ) against a judgment of the high court in a first appeal, unless there is anything in the rules contained in the schedule to the code ..... subordinate courts. hence it was necessary to provide specifically that the provisions of that order will apply to appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent which are against the judgments of the high court and not of subordinate courts. order 44 however, is of a general nature and applies ..... unable to agree with this contention. the expression ' appeal ' used in this order is comprehensive enough and includes all appeals, including a letters patent appeal. the code of civil procedure is an act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedure of the courts of civil judicature. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 1972 (HC)

The Andhra Mennonite Self-supporting Church Society Vs. Sundramma and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP19

..... 2, c. p. c. we , therefore find no merit in this submission.16. in the result, the judgment and decree of the learned single judge are affirmed and this letters patent appeal is dismissed. in the place of the decree of the trial court, there will be a decree as per the award passed by the arbitrator. in the circumstances of ..... appeal be decreed in terms of the award. the decree of the trial court was accordingly set aside. it is against this decision of our learned brother that this letters patent appeal has been filed by the plaintiff.4. mr. upendralal waghray, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, raised before us two main contentions; firstly, that the secretary of the ..... venkatarama sastry, j.1. the plaintiff is the appellant in this letters patent appeal. this appeal arises out of the decision of our learned brother, sriramulu, j., rendered in c.c.c.a. no. 30 of 1965. the said appeal was preferred by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1972 (HC)

Bhimavarapu Subba Reddy and anr. Vs. B. Nagireddy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-1972

Reported in : AIR1973AP184

..... by the plaintiffs. it was further provided that the plaintiffs would be entitled to recover money in execution, if it was not deposited.7. the plaintiffs have preferred this letters patent appeal against the judgment and decree of this court in a. s. no. 404 of 1966.8. the two questions for consideration are :(1) whether the a schedule property or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1972 (HC)

Cherukuru Muthayya Vs. Gadde Gopalakrishnayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-11-1972

Reported in : AIR1974AP85

..... to say so in section 11 itself as is said in section 15. the fact that the legislature did not want to clothe orders under section 11 with finality is patent if the scheme and purpose of the act are kept in view, it would be plain that while the legislature wanted every dispute between the state and the landholder and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //