Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.049 seconds)

Oct 11 1973 (HC)

M. Gangappa Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-11-1973

Reported in : AIR1975AP138

..... such a rule either on the ground that it is not within the power or that it is repugnant to the parent act.102. in rex v. comptroller general of patents: bayer products ltd., ex pane. (1943) 2 kb 306 at p. 311, scott, l. j., said '..... the effect of the words 'asappear to him to be necessary or expedient' is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1973 (HC)

Govinda Raja Rice Mill Vs. the Union of India and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-1973

Reported in : [1974]34STC172(AP)

..... is not attracted to the case and the sales are directly governed by section 6(1a) of the act. in that view, the appeal was dismissed with costs. this letters patent appeal is against that judgment of our learned brother.6. sri mahadev for the appellant gave up the contention which he had raised before chinnappa reddy, j. he stated that ..... accordance with the law. the union of india, which was the first defendant, adopted that written statement. it, however, has not chosen to appear before us and contest this letters patent appeal.4. the trial court held that by virtue of sub-section (1a) introduced in section 6 of the central act, by the ordinance of 1969, the claim for the ..... on the merits of the plaintiff's claim it is not necessary to decide that question and we are not expressing any opinion thereon.20. in the result, the letters patent appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed. having regard to the circumstances of the case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs of the letters ..... sambasiva rao, j. 1. the question we have to answer in this letters patent appeal is not an easy one. it is whether the sale of rice, milled out of paddy, which has been subjected to purchase tax under the state law, is liable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1973 (HC)

Teju Singh Vs. Shanta Devi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-1973

Reported in : AIR1974AP274

krishna rao, j. 1. this appeal is filed by the defendant under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of our learned brother sambasiva rao, j. dismissing c.c.c.a.no. 124 of 1970 (reported in : air1973ap51 , teju singh v. shanta devi).2. the plaintiff .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 1973 (HC)

P. Krishnamoorthi Gupta and ors. Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1973

Reported in : AIR1974AP252

..... . assuming without so holding that that andhra pradesh rice procurement (levy) and restriction on sale order, 1967 applies to the subject matter of the first memo even then it is patently clear that on the date when it was issued, the government had no power to issue such a direction. it has already been seen that clause-4, sub-clauses (1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1973 (HC)

Paleru Venkateswarlu and ors. Vs. Potina Venkateswarulu and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-09-1973

Reported in : AIR1973AP264

..... deputy commissioner to the court: (ii) where it is passed by the court, to the high court'. 33. on a careful and close reading of this section it would be patently clear that sub-section (i) declares that notwithstanding any scheme judgment, decree or order of a court, tribunal or other authority or any custom or usage governing endowment the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1973 (HC)

Shaik Basha and anr. Vs. Station House Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-1973

Reported in : AIR1974AP72

..... to section 12 of the a.p. gaming act, since they cannot be said to be gambling in a public place. battey, j. observed that the word 'place' which is patent of many different meanings, must necessarily , in each instance in which it is used by the legislature , be construed with reference to the intention to be inferred from the context .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 1973 (HC)

Adapa Abbayi Vs. Reddipantulu Choudhry and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-01-1973

Reported in : AIR1974AP139

..... the landlords are permitted to receive the rent even after the breach and still protect their right of action against the tenant. the absurdity of such a conclusion becomes more patent when , as we have held , the principle of waiver applies to such a case. the landlord cannot waive his right of action and at the same time institute the action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1973 (HC)

Mothika Mutyalu and anr. Vs. Mothika Appayyalingam and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-1973

Reported in : AIR1975AP19

..... , however, on merits, it was found in favour of the appellants that the alienation is not for the benefit of the family, if the plea is permissible. hence this letters patent appeal.8. the principal contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is that the learned judge erred in holding that the 3rd defendant-alienee took possession of the suit ..... kondaiah. j. 1. this letters patent appeal by the plaintiffs directed against the judgment of our learned brother. vaidva, j., dismissing their appeal, gives rise to a short question of law. whether or not the after- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1973 (HC)

Rachapudi Subramanyam and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-20-1973

Reported in : AIR1974AP55

..... been suggested before the court from exempting the government from the equity arising out of the acts done by the exporters to their prejudice relying upon the representation.' it is patently clear that the supreme court has not laid down any law in an absolute manner, it is recognised that there are certain exemptions to the doctrine of estoppel as regards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1973 (HC)

State Bank of Hyderabad Vs. Kotha Papi Reddy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-19-1973

Reported in : AIR1975AP25

..... guarantor has only undertaken to guarantee the payment by the borrower and the observance of the terms and conditions of the bond which the former has executed. it is thus patent that there is no security given by the guarantor under the instrument. so the deed cannot be called a security bond. in the result, it does not come under article .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //