Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 21 results (0.038 seconds)

Apr 17 1974 (HC)

Harijander Singh Vs. Selection Committee, Kakatiya Medical College, Wa ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-17-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP35

..... it is quite relevant to refer to halsbury's laws of england, iv edition, page 150, where it is said:'certiorari may issue to inferior statutory tribunals such as the patents appeal tribunal and to inferior non-statutory tribunals discharging functions of public nature.'99. these decisions make it abundantly plain that the earlier bench decision in (1971) 2 an wr ..... article 226 of the constitution. such a body is amenable, therefore, to the jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution.'it was further observed:'it would be patently clear that the college is a body of persons of a public character which has to determine sometimes matters affecting civil rights of the teachers and also students of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1974 (HC)

P. Bathinaiah Vs. P. Visweswara Pillai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP11

..... it is a fit case for appeal.9. in the absence of such declaration, it unambiguously emerges from the language of clause 15 of the letters patent that no letters patent appeal against the order of chinnappa reddi, j. in c. m.a. no. 562 of 1972 is maintainable. the reference is answered accordingly. however ..... first part of clause 15. ramesam. j. observed at page 225 = (at p. 572 of air) that 'civil procedure code does not control the section of the letters patent.' the same view was expressed by ananta krishna aiyar, j. also at page 235 = (at p. 576 of air). but this does not help the contention of ..... the high court, unless the judge who has passed the judgment declares that the case is a fit one for appeal. the reason for this is patent. when a single judge of this court sits in appeal over a judgment or order passed by the appellate court in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction ..... remitted the appeal back to that court for its disposal on merits. the plaintiff seeks to impugn this order of chinnappa reddy, j., by filing this letters patent appeal.3. the office took an objection that the c.m.a. disposed of by chinnappa reddy, j. is in the nature of a second appeal ..... brought by the appellants to the trial court for disposal on merits.2. what happened in this case is; the plaintiff. who seeks to bring this letters patent appeal, filed o. s. no. 149 of 1966 in the district munsifs court, srikalahasthi for permanent injunction in respect of certain properties. that claim was founded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1974 (HC)

Revenue Divisional Officer, Vijayawada Vs. T. Laxminarayana

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-22-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP109

..... the madras high court consisting of rajamannar, c. j. and chandra reddi, j. also condemned this practice and observed :'we cannot tolerate the practice of filing an appeal with a patently deficit court-fee simply because before the last date of filing the appeal the appellant is unable to secure enough money for payment of the full court-fee and then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1974 (HC)

Musala Annaji Rao and anr. Vs. Boggarapu Papaiah Setty

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP73

..... on the decision of our learned brother, a. v. krishna rao, j. in c. m. p. no. 5573 of 1971 etc., dated 11th july 1972 (andh. pra.). hence this letters patent appeal.3. the sum and substance of the contentions of mr. chalk sitaramayya, the learned counsel for the appellants, is that mere is an 'appeal' within the meaning of order ..... kondaiah, j.1. this letters patent appeal arising out of o. s. no. 93 of 1969 on the file of the additional subordinate judge's court, kurnool and directed against the order of our learned brother, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1974 (HC)

Ganesh Parshad Vs. Adi Hindu Social Service League Represented by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-23-1974

Reported in : AIR1975AP310

..... learned brother, madhava reddy, j. by his order dated 24-8-1972 allowed the respondent's appeal and set aside the concurrent order of the courts below. hence this letters patent appeal by the appellant.9. the learned counsel, sri peri subba rao, appearing for the appellant, contended that section 144 of the code of civil procedure is mandatory and leaves ..... sriramulu, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of our learned brother, madhava reddy j. in a. a. a. o. no. 16 of 1971, allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1974 (HC)

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Legisetty Ramayya and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-12-1974

Reported in : 1975CriLJ144

..... manner as it exercises its other appellate jurisdiction and when such jurisdiction is exercised by a single judge, his judgment becomes .subject to appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, there being nothing to the contrary in the trade marks act.41. in the case before us similarly there being nothing to the contrary in the essential commodities act, the ..... )(f). defence of india act (1939) is not a judgment, decree or order within the meaning of sections 109 and 110 of the civil procedure code or clause 29 of the letters patent of the nagpur high court and therefore the federal court could not have granted special leave. the supreme court came to this conclusion on the ground that the judgment of ..... as it exercises its other appellate jurisdiction and when such jurisdiction is exercised by a single judge his judgment becomes subject to an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, there being nothing to the contrary in the trade marks act. in hanskumar v. union of india : [1959]1scr1177 , however, a different note was struck by the supreme court, there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 1974 (HC)

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. the Associated Tanners

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-15-1974

Reported in : [1975]36STC32(AP)

..... , it would be tantamount to importing something which is not there and to offending thereby the provisions of section 15 of the central act. the fallacy in this argument is patent. item 9(b) does authorise levy of tax on tanned goods at the rate of three paise in the rupee when they are purchased by a manufacturer in the state ..... be made in a particular manner, that will also have to be made in the same manner for the purposes of the central sales tax act. 30. it is thus patent that the learned judges, while deciding the case, were largely relying on yaddalam's case [1965] 16 s.t.c. 231 (s.c.), the effect of which was nullified by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1974 (HC)

S. Narasimha Shenoy and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-1974

Reported in : [1975]36STC336(AP)

..... sales to non-residents and sales of packed food by the petitioner-company to its customers are taxable under the punjab act. 10. the above case was carried in letters patent appeal by the state and was affirmed in state of punjab v. associated hotels of india ltd. [1967] 20 s.t.c. 1. in further appeal to the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1974 (HC)

Verma Narasimha Rao Vs. the Superintendent of Excise, Krishna and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-29-1974

Reported in : AIR1974AP157

..... is said 'compensation for any loss or damages caused to him thereby', section 74 uses the words extracted above. the differences in the language of the two sections is too patent to require any elaboration. what should follow from these words of section 74 is that if legal injury by breach of contract is once proved, then the court in cases .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1974 (HC)

Sudha Ramaiah Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-1974

Reported in : AIR1974AP250

..... the correct criteria laid down in the abovesaid bench decision of this court were not at all borne in mind and applied by the state government . the order therefore is patently inconsistent with the provisions of the act and cannot be allowed to remain on record.24. our attentions was drawn to a single judge's decision reported in dastgir saheb ..... central government . we do not think that in the light of the said decision , we should refuse to interfere with the state government 's order which , as stated earlier , is patently wrong .25. then what is the relief which we can grant to the petitioner in the light of what is stated above we can only direct the state government to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //