Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1976 Page 1 of about 18 results (0.033 seconds)

Mar 23 1976 (HC)

Vadla Krishnaiah and anr. Vs. Nalli Narasimhareddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-1976

Reported in : AIR1976AP395

s. obul reddi, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of venkatarama sastry, j, allowing the second appeal preferred by the plaintiff. 2. defendants 1 and 2 are the appellants before us. they resisted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1976 (HC)

Osmania College Vs. D.V. Subba Sastry and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-15-1976

Reported in : (1977)IILLJ487AP

..... college management was requested to continue respondents 1 and 2 and that is why sri shiv sharper built up the argument that the request could not be enforced. it is patent from a reading of the resolution that the request is clearly a decision made by the university syndicate and that decision was rendered in pursuance of clause 10 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1976 (HC)

Buddala China Venkata Rao and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-23-1976

Reported in : [1978]112ITR58(AP); [1978]41STC232(AP)

..... glaring and obvious cannot be similarly rectified. prima facie it may appear somewhat strange that an order which was good and valid when it was made should be treated as patently invalid and wrong by virtue of the retrospective operation of the amendment act.....' the action of the income-tax officer was held to be justified. to a like effect is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1976 (HC)

N.M. Mehta Vs. Coromandal Fertilizers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-08-1976

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ151AP

..... expressions 'no employer shall without a reasonable cause ...terminate the service of an employee.,' and the words 'without giving such employee...'. the expression 'such employee' used in the later limb patently refers to the employee whose services have been terminated. therefore, it appears to us that in the first part of the sub-section, the legislature has imposed an embargo on ..... reasons. learned government pleader gave his support to the construction laid by the employee-appellant. if sub-section (1) is read by itself, it may be capable of either construction. patently the wording of the sub-section is not very happy. we hope and trust that the legislature would, at the earliest point of time, amend the sub-section in such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1976 (HC)

Kisheera Ramalingeswaraswamy Vs. Nandula Buchi Ramayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-1976

Reported in : AIR1977AP160

..... that nothing contained in any law of limitation for the time being in force shall be deemed to vest in any person, the property or funds of any religious institution. patently and unambiguously the word 'vest' when read in the context of any law of limitation would mean vesting with absolute and full rights by way of prescription. by introducing this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1976 (HC)

The Union of India and anr. Vs. Batchu Subba Rao and Co.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-26-1976

Reported in : AIR1977AP289

..... is sufficient to hold that the plaintiff had discharged the light burden that was imposed on him by law and in such a case. the railway has brought this letters patent appeal against the decree passed against it. but there is no appeal or cross examinations by the plaintiff in respect of the disallowed portion.5. sri venkataramana reddy learned counsel ..... . a question relating to the meaning and application of s. 76-f of the indian railways act and the burden proof arising out therefrom falls for decision in this letters patent appeal.2. it is against the decision of sriramulu, j. in s.a. 649 of 1972. while partly allowing the second appeal the learned judge granted leave.3. the material ..... awarded a decree for rs.2,130/-. the quantum is not disputed either by the railway or by the plaintiff- respondent. consequently we affirm that decree and dismiss the letters patent appeal. in the circumstances of the case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs of the letters .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1976 (HC)

Venkata Rao Vs. T. Ramakrishna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-1976

Reported in : AIR1977AP247

..... and the remand made by the lower appellate court to the trial court for adjudication of the suit on its merits is quite justified.12. in the result, the letters patent appeal is dismissed with costs.13. c. m. p. no. 7095/76 :- now that the main appeal is dismissed, the stay petition also is dismissed. the trial court shall now ..... a. sambasiva rao, a.c.j.1. a question under section 36 of the stamp act arises for consideration in this letters patent appeal which is preferred against the decision of our learned brother jayachandra reddy, j. in a. a. o. no. 212/75 dismissing it.2. the question arises in the following .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1976 (HC)

Nooka Agaiah and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-24-1976

Reported in : [1977]39STC521(AP)

..... he maintains that there is no reason why these commodities, which are also obtained from paddy, should be placed in a more disadvantageous position than actual rice. this argument is patently based on article 14 of the constitution, though the learned counsel does not admit that he is relying on the equality right guaranteed to the citizen under article 14 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1976 (HC)

K. V. V. Satyanarayana Vs. Yenamandala Subba Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-05-1976

Reported in : AIR1977AP139

..... saleable interest in the property sold in execution. the full bench held that the suit filed by the auction-purchaser for refund of purchase money was not maintainable. it is patent that it does not say anything which is partinent to the question raised before us. here, the question is whether the court sale in null and void. if it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1976 (HC)

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.R.N.S. and Co.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-20-1976

Reported in : [1977]109ITR574(AP)

..... supreme court in t. s. balaram, income-tax officer v. volkart brothers : [1971]82itr50(sc) , has pointed out that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions. a decision on a debatable ..... of the relevant provisions of the act in a proceeding under section 154 of the income-tax act, 1961. a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may conceivably be two opinions. as seen earlier, the high .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //